· Private foundation
The Countess Moira Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $37k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+2 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RETREAT INC | $250,000 |
| EAST END HOSPICE INC | $250,000 |
| FAMILY CENTER INC | $200,000 |
| 914 CARES INC | $196,625 |
| NEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE | $150,000 |
| DELIVERING GOOD INC | $150,000 |
| NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY | $125,000 |
| FIVER CHILDRENS FOUNDATION INC | $100,000 |
| CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT | $100,000 |
| COMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT INC | $90,000 |
| WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC | $76,600 |
| CRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL | $70,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND | $65,000 |
| THE ELM PROJECT INC | $50,000 |
| COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $5.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT6× · 2019–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +0%
- EEEast End Hospice Inc5× · 2020–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +15%
- NYNEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE6× · 2019–2025 · $900k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORKgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +42%
- LILong Island Cares Incone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +7%
- EENACTone grant, 2019 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.
CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.
We strive to maximize participation in, and support for, federally funded nutrition assistance programs including supplemental nutrition assistance program (snap), the school breakfast program and national school lunch program, the summer…
To provide a program for children with special needs, ages three to five years by utilizing the disciplines of psychology, speech therapy, occupational therapy, and physical therapy as integral functions of the educational program.
The mission of girls inc. of new york city is to advocate for and improve the lives of underserved girls and youth, ages 6 to 21+, in the five boroughs. we pursue this mission by providing research-based educational programs in the areas…
To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.
To provide quality programs for young children with special needs.
Partnership with children's mission is to strengthen the emotional, social, and cognitive skills of children in new york city so they can succeed in school, society, and life.
The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…
Cany provides independent oversight of prisons in new york to promote transparency and accountability; safeguard the human and civil rights of incarcerated people; identify and provoke a response to harmful practices and policies;…
Established in 1971, the mission of the new york foundation for the arts (nyfa) is to empower artists in all disciplines, as well as cultural workers, to achieve success on their own terms by providing critical support, resources, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is East Side House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Camp Exclamation Point Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTER FOR CIVILIANS IN CONFLICT ↗
- Who funds DELIVERING GOOD INC ↗
- Who funds East End Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK HALL OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
- Who funds Retreat Inc ↗
- Who funds (914) CARES INC ↗
- Who funds FIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY-WORD PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds THE FAMILY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS FOR EQUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Storytelling Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN MAKE MOVIES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds ASTOR SERVICES FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES ↗
- Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ELM PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Womens Sports Foundation ↗
- Who funds Long Island Cares Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HELP IN PARK SLOPE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY BAIL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP EXCLAMATION POINT INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK JUNIOR TENNIS LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds FARMS FOR CITY KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA CONSERVATORY INC ↗
- Who funds COUNTY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Express Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Td Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Countess Moira Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Camp Exclamation Point Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.