Skip to content
The Callagy Christian Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Callagy Christian Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$30
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$310kHealth$220kPhilanthropy$154kEducation$115kCivil Rights$113kReligion$94kRecreation & Sports$72kAnimals$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$30
Median grant
1
States reached
$1k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITYVISION INTERNATIONAL$30
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $199k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 46% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%WINTHROP CHARITIES: $25k → 16%OPERATION BEACHHEAD: $1k → 6%STOP TRAFFICKING US: $6k → 7%UNSILENCED VOICES: $57k → 14%THE AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLI: $100k → 7%UNSILENCED VOICES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
NY
MA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
TN
NC
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$685k · 12 repeat orgs$751k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
44

Total granted

$685k
$751k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+26%

Still filing today

67%
34%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES
    4× · 2018–2021 · $41k · revenue +100%
  • BR
    Believe Ranch and Rescue
    2× · 2021–2022 · $30k · revenue +82%
  • SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $15k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE
    one grant, 2021 · $150k
  • PH
    PRIMROSE HILL SCHOOLgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $110k · revenue +94%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +10%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Oprah Winfrey Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
2
The Ralph Lauren Corporate Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Global Reach Miracle Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Rod Stiefvater Foundation
Philanthropy
5
The Retina Vitreous Foundation
Health
6
Nick Simons Foundation International
Philanthropy
7
The Robbins Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Winthrop Rockefeller Foundation
—
9
Robinson Foundation
—
10
World Aid Runners
Health
11
Untrafficked Inc
Human Services
12
Johnson & Johnson Foundation United States Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sanctuary for Families Inc; the most unlike its peers is Believe Ranch and Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
18/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE: $150,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THETHE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherTHE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $125,450 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPRIMROSE HILL SCHOOL: $110,065 · OtherPRIMROSE HILL SCHOOLIN OUR HANDS ACTION FUND: $110,000 · OtherIN OUR HANDS ACTION FUNDPASCACK BIBLE CHURCH: $66,000 · OtherPASCACK BIBLE CHURCHINDIEGOGO INC: $50,000 · Other+31 more: $255,292 · Other+31 moreAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FOUNDATI…UNSILENCED VOICES: $66,500 · Human ServicesUNSILENCED VOICESWINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST: $25,000 · Human ServicesWINTHROP CHARITIE…SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesSANCTUARY FOR FAM…HO'OLA NA PUA: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $7,000 · Human ServicesCLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER: $62,800 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · HealthTHE MIKE GELTRUDE FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 · HealthFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $41,000 · Youth DevelopmentPERUVIAN HEARTS: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBelieve Ranch and Rescue: $30,351 · AnimalsTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $25,000 · EducationTHE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyMARIANO RIVERA FOUNDATION: $2,500 · PhilanthropyGOFUNDMEORG: $1,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $60 · Philanthropy
Other$1,016,807Human Services$223,500Health$70,600Youth Development$46,000Animals$30,351Education$25,000Philanthropy$23,560

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATION: $150,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER: $62,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $41,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAERIAL RECOVERY: $31,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetBelieve Ranch and Rescue: $30,351 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetWINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST: $25,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetTHE FOSTER ALLIANCE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetSANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNick Lowery Youth Foundation: $15,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetHO'OLA NA PUA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIKE GELTRUDE FOUNDATION INC: $2,800 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMARIANO RIVERA FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetWomans Club of Ridgewood: $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCharityVision International: $60 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TONY ROBBINS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRIMROSE HILL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds UNSILENCED VOICES ↗
  • Who funds CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds AERIAL RECOVERY ↗
  • Who funds Believe Ranch and Rescue ↗
  • Who funds WINTHROP CHARITIES TRUST ↗
  • Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds THE ROGER CLEMENS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANCTUARY FOR FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Nick Lowery Youth Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HO'OLA NA PUA ↗
  • Who funds Stop Trafficking US ↗
  • Who funds PERUVIAN HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…Paypal Charitable Giv…Natl Christian Charit…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN6.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Callagy Christian Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Callagy Christian Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    6get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Callagy Christian Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Callagy Christian Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Callagy Christian’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home