· Private foundation
The Byrnes Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $287k
- $50k–250k8 grants · $652k
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Boost Others | $500,000 |
| Fidelity Charitable Gift Fund | $150,000 |
| Blackburn Foundation | $100,000 |
| James Madison Institute | $85,000 |
| Camp Harborview | $75,000 |
| Evergreen Christian School | $72,325 |
| Community School of Naples | $70,000 |
| Jill's House | $50,000 |
| Prager University Foundation | $50,000 |
| Show Hope | $40,000 |
| Project Belong | $40,000 |
| Potomac School | $37,200 |
| Gulfshore Playhouse | $25,000 |
| Belmont Hill School | $20,000 |
| Concerned Women Association | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $998k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +43% for the ones you funded once.
46 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $263k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BOBOOST OTHERS INC5× · 2020–2024 · $760k · revenue +36%
- FHFlint Hill School6× · 2017–2024 · $355k · revenue +47%
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC4× · 2019–2024 · $250k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- ICINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRYone grant, 2019 · $200k
- CSCATHEDRAL SCHOOL OF BOSTONone grant, 2019 · $100k
- SAST ANN CHURCHone grant, 2020 · $55k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.
We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
We conduct fundamental infectious disease research to generate critical new knowledge about pathogens and their interactions with see schedule o for continuationhumans to enable the discovery and development of novel interventions,…
TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…
A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.
The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOOST OTHERS INC ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds Flint Hill School ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds EVERGREEN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds The Potomac School ↗
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INNOVATIONS FOR GOSPEL IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds PRAGER UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH FOR TOMORROW-NEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE JAMES MADISON INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds BELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds GROVE CITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE ↗
- Who funds GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Donors Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Project Belong VA ↗
- Who funds Fun Time Early Childhood Academy Inc ↗
- Who funds PATTY BAKER HUMANE SOCIETY NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds Institute for Humane Studies ↗
- Who funds ENOUGH IS ENOUGH ↗
- Who funds EMPOWERING ACTION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northern Virginia Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Servant Foundation · Boost Others Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Collier Community Foundation Inc · Donors Trust Inc · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Byrnes Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- The Shelter for Abused Women & Children Inc — 2% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Covenant House Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
- Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc — 0% of income from government
- Gulfshore Playhouse Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Avow Hospice Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.