· Public charity
Boost Others Inc
To support the local community by providing resources for under-resourced children and other individuals through referrals from social workers, schools and other sources.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 23 grants below total $521,450 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $591,950 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $70,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k19 grants · $280k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $241k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INNOVATIONS FOR GOSPEL IMPACT | $70,750 |
| DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION | $70,000 |
| WHOLEHEARTED FOUNDATION | $50,300 |
| SHE BELIEVES IN ME | $50,000 |
| PROJECT BELONG | $45,000 |
| TREE OF LIFE | $40,000 |
| HOPE FOR NEW YORK | $20,000 |
| DC127 | $20,000 |
| JILL'S HOUSE | $15,000 |
| GOOD PROJECTS INC | $10,400 |
| CITY RELIEF | $10,000 |
| NEW CITY NETWORK | $10,000 |
| BETTER TOGETHER | $10,000 |
| OTAN | $10,000 |
| FOSTER VILLAGE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $312k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $311k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ICINTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES3× · 2021–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +19%
- CECHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC4× · 2021–2024 · $297k · revenue +9%
- SBSHE BELIEVES IN ME3× · 2022–2024 · $67k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- WWEARECITYLIGHTone grant, 2023 · $256k
- RSREEDIFICANDO SOBRE LA ROCA MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2022 · $142k
- OUOTHER UNDER 5Kone grant, 2022 · $81k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…
Religious
We offer hope and help to refugee, asylumseeking, and immigrant families in the Washington D.C. metro area. We provide educational programs that help families learn English. We provide practical assistance and connections to community…
Serving and pastoring overseas workers on their own turf and equipping nationals by training and empowering them in their work of advancing the gospel.
Our mission is to make disciples of jesus christ by engaging indigenous pastors around the world. our vision is to train pastors and their congregants to share the gospel in a friendly, non-denominational approach across all ethnicities,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Union Inc and the most unlike its peers is Ncn Foundation Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 11 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
35 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 35 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CARE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN UNION INC ↗
- Who funds INNOVATIONS FOR GOSPEL IMPACT INC ↗
- Who funds DREAM CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHE BELIEVES IN ME ↗
- Who funds Project Belong VA ↗
- Who funds SALT MOVEMENT ↗
- Who funds Wholehearted Foundation ↗
- Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
- Who funds TOL Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds NOURISHED HEARTS ↗
- Who funds DC127 Inc ↗
- Who funds MENA KDEC MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Allegro ↗
- Who funds Healing Africa Ministries ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK EDGE INC ↗
- Who funds LA ROCA MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Dare 2 Share Ministries ↗
- Who funds GOOD PROJECTS INC ↗
- Who funds CITY RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds Care Net ↗
- Who funds ATLANTIC GATEWAY COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SEMPER K9 ASSISTANCE DOGS ↗
- Who funds Homestretch Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovations for Gospel Impact Inc · Servant Foundation · The Byrnes Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Boost Others Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Boost Others Inc?
Find your warmest path to Boost Others Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.