Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Bolwell Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$113k
Granted FY2025still arriving
50
Grants FY2025still arriving
16
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$173kHealth$98kEducation$65kHuman Services$48kEnvironment$33kCommunity Improvement$23kPhilanthropy$18kHousing & Shelter$17kOther$0
02FY2025 · 50 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k49 grants · $103k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,500
Median grant
16
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Stand Up to Cancer$10,000
Duke University$6,000
Vail Valley Foundation$6,000
Alight$5,000
Vail Christian High School$5,000
Save the Children Foundation$5,000
Internationl Rescue Committee$5,000
Direct Relief International$5,000
Good360$5,000
St Gianna's Place$3,500
The Hunger Project$3,000
Amazon Conservation Team$3,000
Water for People$3,000
Breast Cancer Research Foundation$3,000
Doctors Without Borders$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%A Precious Child: $250 → 5%St Gianna's Place: $10k → 5%A Precious Child: $250 → 5%St Gianna's Place: $4k → 5%A Precious Child: $250 → 5%St Gianna's Place: $4k → 5%The Family Place: $2k → 14%St Gianna's Place: $3k → 5%The Family Place: $2k → 14%The Arc of the United States: $1k → 14%The Family Place: $2k → 14%The Family Place: $2k → 14%The Family Place: $1k → 14%Flatwater Foundation: $2k → 10%Flatwater Foundation: $1k → 10%Flatwater Foundation: $1k → 10%Flatwater Foundation: $1k → 10%Flatwater Foundation: $521 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$444k · 54 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 42 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
20

Total granted

$444k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
-3%

Still filing today

83%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthInternationalEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +1%
  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +1%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $27k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • TH
    The Hope Center
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • Central Texas Food Bank Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $3k · revenue -28%
  • WT
    Walk to Defeat ALS Charlotte
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
2
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
3
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
4
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
8
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
11
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
12
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vail Health Services Foundation; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
61/62
Grantees still filing
37/62
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Save The Children Federation Inc: $27,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation IncInternational Rescue Committee INC: $27,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INCDIRECT RELIEF: $27,000 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEFALIGHT: $24,350 · InternationalALIGHTGOOD360: $20,000 · InternationalGOOD360THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $15,180 · InternationalTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECTWATER FOR PEOPLE: $15,000 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLEMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC+1 more: $2,500 · InternationalCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $12,400 · OtherCARITAS OF AUSTINVAIL CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $9,500 · OtherVAIL CHRISTIAN HIGH SCHOOLSusan G Komen For The Cure: $9,000 · OtherSusan G Komen For The CureTomahawk Foundation: $6,000 · OtherMOORE COUNTY CITIZENS PET RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE: $6,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 · OtherTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUN…AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $15,000 · OtherAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAMGlobal Green USA: $6,000 · OtherEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $5,700 · OtherDIVINE CANINES: $5,000 · Other+30 more: $44,690 · Other+30 moreDUKE UNIVERSITY: $27,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVERSI…READ ALLIANCE INC: $13,500 · EducationREAD ALLIANCE…THE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL: $6,500 · EducationTHE LOOMIS IN…WALKING MOUNTAINS: $5,000 · EducationWALKING MOUNT…CHILD INC: $2,000 · Education+4 more: $4,000 · Education+4 moreActive Minds Inc: $8,000 · HealthActive Min…BREASTCANCERORG: $8,000 · HealthBREASTCANC…VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $7,500 · HealthVAIL HEALT…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,000 · HealthBLOOD CANC…CAP & CONQUER INC: $5,500 · HealthCAP & CONQ…EAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH: $2,500 · HealthEAGLE VALL…CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $1,750 · Health+5 more: $5,000 · Health+5 moreST GIANNA'S PLACE INC: $19,500 · Human ServicesThe Family Place: $7,350 · Human ServicesTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $5,825 · Human ServicesAUSTIN POLICE OPERATION BLUE SANTA: $3,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,750 · Human ServicesSTAND UP TO CANCER: $15,000 · PhilanthropyEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,700 · PhilanthropyYOUTHPOWER365: $2,000 · PhilanthropyALL WITHIN MY HANDS: $1,000 · PhilanthropyVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $23,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $149 · Community Improvement
International$172,530Other$139,290Education$58,000Health$45,250Human Services$37,425Philanthropy$29,700Community Improvement$23,149

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $27,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALIGHT: $24,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD360: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST GIANNA'S PLACE INC: $19,500 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetTHE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT: $15,180 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTAND UP TO CANCER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetREAD ALLIANCE INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCARITAS OF AUSTIN: $12,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,700 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetActive Minds Inc: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREASTCANCERORG: $8,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Family Place: $7,350 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL: $6,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGlobal Green USA: $6,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE FLATWATER FOUNDATON: $5,825 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST: $5,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCAP & CONQUER INC: $5,500 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetWALKING MOUNTAINS: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIVINE CANINES: $5,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN POLICE OPERATION BLUE SANTA: $3,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN PETS ALIVE INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPALESTINE CHILDREN'S RELIEF FUND: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHPOWER365: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $1,750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAUSTIN DOG RESCUE INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE POSSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL OF TEXAS PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COUNCIL: $1,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGE CORPORATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetORGANIZATION FOR AUTISM RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAUTISTIC SELF ADVOCACY NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds VAIL VALLEY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GOOD360 ↗
  • Who funds ST GIANNA'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL HUNGER PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds AMAZON CONSERVATION TEAM ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds STAND UP TO CANCER ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds READ ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS OF AUSTIN ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Active Minds Inc ↗
  • Who funds BREASTCANCERORG ↗
  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Family Place ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOOMIS INSTITUTE D/B/A THE LOOMIS CHAFFEE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Global Green USA ↗
  • Who funds THE FLATWATER FOUNDATON ↗
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CAP & CONQUER INC ↗
  • Who funds WALKING MOUNTAINS ↗
  • Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DIVINE CANINES ↗
  • Who funds TOMAHAWK CHARITABLE SOLUTIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN POLICE OPERATION BLUE SANTA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Jewish FoundationMI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Jewish Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Joyce & Paul Krasnow Charitable Foundation · Helle Family Foundation · The Precourt Foundation · Frechette Family Foundation · Frey Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Bright Funds Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Bolwell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Bolwell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Bolwell’s filings →

More from the funding graph