Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Helle Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$718k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$271k
Largest
01What you fund
0184% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$2.2MHealth$1.2MPhilanthropy$507kPublic Safety & Disaster$246kYouth Development$107kRecreation & Sports$55kHousing & Shelter$51kCrime & Legal$48kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $118k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $285k
  • $250k+1 grant · $271k
$2,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS$271,127
THE JOSSELYN CENTER$133,513
EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FUND$101,516
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$50,339
AMERICAN RED CROSS$35,564
VAIL HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,870
STEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE$20,801
VAIL VETERNS FOUNDATION INC$12,881
GUARDIAN SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$12,214
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO$10,453
WALKING MOUNTAINS SCIENCE CENTER$5,108
LIFT UP$5,000
PECS FOUNDATION$5,000
HOOKER COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $264k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $45k → 8%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $5k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $35k → 8%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $5k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $30k → 8%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $5k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 8%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $5k → 6%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $25k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $15k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $36k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $1k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $1k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $500 → 14%CLEARBROOK: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
RI
CA
CO
NE
MD
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Helle Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Helle Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.6% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 44 repeat orgs$650k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

44 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
42

Total granted

$4.0M
$221k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+30%

Still filing today

45%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $429k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Illinois Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.4M · revenue +127%
  • TJ
    THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.1M · revenue ×13
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    8× · 2017–2024 · $241k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • VC
    VANGUARD CHARITABLE PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY FOUNDERS
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
  • VH
    VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $23k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
4
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
5
American Geophysical Union

Agu's mission is to advance and support an inclusive community of earth and space scientists and partners dedicated to discovery and solutions to societal challenges. agu seeks to catalyze discovery and solutions to scientific and societal…

Science & Tech
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

11
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

12
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc and the most unlike its peers is Guardian Scholars Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Policy Research and AdvocacyVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Developmental Disabilities …Environmental Conservation …Cancer Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsAffordable Housing Developm…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%2%<5yr13%7%5–10yr18%12%10–20yr15%34%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr22%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%0%<5yr13%0%5–10yr18%3%10–20yr15%3%20–35yr14%4%35–55yr22%89%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%
2/50
the rest of the field
12%
8,889/72,309

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 97 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
44/48
Grantees still filing
30/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS — $271,127 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOISEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $265,802 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONPECS FOUNDATION — $147,000 · OtherPECS FOUNDATIONEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FUND — $101,516 · OtherEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FUNDYOUTH GUIDANCE BAM PROGRAM — $90,495 · OtherYOUTH GUIDANCE BAM PROGRAMARRUPE COLLEGE — $75,025 · OtherGVC SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $52,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $52,500 · Other+59 more — $492,050 · Other+59 moreUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $1,366,369 · EducationUniversity of Illinois FoundationLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $55,379 · Education+5 more — $60,843 · EducationTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP — $1,053,664 · HealthTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFPVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $70,870 · HealthVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUND…+7 more — $44,051 · HealthEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $360,000 · Philanthropy+5 more — $23,464 · PhilanthropyAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $240,705 · Human ServicesLift Up of Routt County — $20,000 · Human ServicesVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC — $12,881 · Human Services+1 more — $3,000 · Human ServicesNorthwestern University — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsUS LACROSSE INC — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+1 more — $250 · Recreation & SportsCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $51,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$1,548,015Education$1,482,591Health$1,168,585Philanthropy$383,464Human Services$276,586Recreation & Sports$55,250Housing & Shelter$51,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation — $1,366,369 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP — $1,053,664 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $360,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $240,705 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION — $70,870 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO — $55,379 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $51,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwestern University — $50,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan — $29,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetGUARDIAN SCHOLARS INC — $24,235 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetSTEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $20,801 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLift Up of Routt County — $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWALKING MOUNTAINS — $17,608 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEAST VILLAGE YOUTH PROGRAM — $15,000 over 2y, 5.7% of budgetOAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC — $12,881 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGUARDIAN SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $12,214 over 1y, 16% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRAVINIA FESTIVAL ASSOCIATION — $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRoss K Macneill Foundation — $6,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLIFT UP — $5,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFriends of Mountain Rescue Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetUS LACROSSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOKER CTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONINC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUR Chicago Alliance — $4,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCLEARBROOK — $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNehemiah Group dba Chicago Eco House — $2,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetAFRICA NEW LIFE MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUTHPOWER365 — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLAND SUMMERS FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetEMERALD CITY THEATRE COMPANY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENILWORTH GARDEN CLUB — $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGROWING HOME INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINNER-CITY EDUCATION PROGRAM — $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKENILWORTH COMMUNITY FUND INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation
  • Who funds THE JOSSELYN CENTER NFP
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FUND
  • Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC
  • Who funds Northwestern University
  • Who funds University of Michigan
  • Who funds GUARDIAN SCHOLARS INC
  • Who funds STEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds Lift Up of Routt County
  • Who funds EAGLE VALLEY MENTAL HEALTH
  • Who funds WALKING MOUNTAINS
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
  • Who funds EAST VILLAGE YOUTH PROGRAM
  • Who funds OAKS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
  • Who funds VAIL VETERANS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GUARDIAN SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ronald Davis Family FoundationCO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ronald Davis Family Foundation · The Winmax Foundation Inc · The Bolwell Foundation · Frechette Family Foundation · Frey Foundation · United Jewish Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Helle Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 97 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph