Skip to content
The Audrey Irmas Foundation for Social Justice at a glance

· Private foundation

The Audrey Irmas Foundation for Social Justice

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$2.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
36
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$296k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Youth Development$4.0MCrime & Legal$2.3MHousing & Shelter$2.1MHealth$1.2MCivil Rights$1.2MInternational$716kEducation$387kHuman Services$166kOther$0
02FY2024 · 36 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $477k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $875k
  • $250k+3 grants · $796k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HEART OF LOS ANGELES$295,985
LA FAMILY HOUSING$250,000
PUBLIC COUNSEL$250,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$200,000
USC NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER$200,000
AFRICA FOUNDATION USA$150,000
BET TZEDEK$150,000
A PLACE CALLED HOME$100,000
NEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES LOS ANGELES$75,000
LITTLE KIDS ROCK - MUSIC WILL$45,000
STRIVE$40,000
ONE JUSTICE$30,000
USC ANNENBERG SCHOOL FOR COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM$30,000
MENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES$30,000
BRESEE FOUNDATION$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $192k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YOUTH VILLAGESJANIES FUND: $20k → 17%YOUTH VILLAGESJANIES FUND: $10k → 17%VISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5k → 14%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $50k → 17%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $25k → 17%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $25k → 14%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $10k → 14%VOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $5k → 14%FIRST STAR INC: $25k → 14%DREAM STREET FOUNDATION: $500 → 14%ABILITYFIRST: $10k → 14%GO CAMPAIGN: $2k → 14%ABILITYFIRST: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
NJ
CA
TN
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 31 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +27% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
19

Total granted

$11M
$980k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+27%

Still filing today

87%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $154k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’22’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $3.2M · revenue +6%
  • LF
    LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +100%
  • PUBLIC COUNSEL
    4× · 2019–2024 · $954k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • US
    USC SCHOOL OF LAW
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • AC
    AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $200k · revenue +29%
  • OF
    ONE FAIR WAGE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Center for Law and Justice

The survivor justice center secures justice for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowers them to create their own future.

—
2
Legal Aid Association of California

The Legal Aid Association of California, the statewide membership of legal services nonprofits, serves its members through advocacy and other support in efforts to provide legal assistance to low-income Californians and ensure access to…

—
3
Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area

As one of the most enduring civil rights institutions on the West Coast, we work to dismantle systems of oppression and racism, and build an equitable and just society.

—
4
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
5
Los Angeles World Affairs Council and Town Hall

The organization is a non-partisan, membership based speakers' forum that connects business leaders, community members, and engaged individuals with shared interest in local, national, and global affairs. it provides an open and accessible…

International
6
Los Angeles County Bar Association (Lacba)

Meeting the professional needs of los angeles lawyers, and improving the administration of justice.

—
7
Aclu Foundation of Southern California

See schedule o for detailsthe organization defends the civil liberties enshrined in the us constitution and the bill of rights through litigation, policy advocacy, media advocacy, and organizing. it fights to secure and protect the civil…

Civil Rights
8
League of Women Voters of Los Angeles

The League of Women Voters, a nonpartisan political organization, encourages informed and active participation in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and…

—
9
Counsel for Justice

CFJ promotes access to justice for underserved communities seeking to assert their legal rights. Our pro bono-based projects bridge the gap for underserved communities seeking safety, stability, and justice. CFJ engages volunteer attorneys…

—
10
Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles

Jfsla's mission is to provide life-improving services that help the people of los angeles live with dignity and exercise self-determination. we believe in and strive for a more compassionate los angeles where no one has to navigate life…

Human Services
11
Los Angeles Innocence Project Inc

The purpose is to exonerate the wrongly convicted, uncover and remedy past misuse of evidence in the courtroom, and improve the dialogue among stakeholders in the criminal legal system to prevent future injustice.

Crime & Legal
12
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Mayor's Fund for Los Angeles; the most unlike its peers is Volunteer Collective. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
51/52
Grantees still filing
30/52
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,851,050 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONUSC NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTER: $1,020,645 · OtherUSC NORRIS COMPREHENSIVE CANCER CENTERUSC SCHOOL OF LAW: $500,000 · OtherUSC SCHOOL OF LAWA PLACE CALLED HOME: $400,000 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMEBET TZEDEK: $350,000 · OtherBET TZEDEKNEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES LOS ANGELES: $325,500 · OtherNEIGHBORHOOD LEGAL SERVICES LOS ANGELESAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $200,000 · Other+35 more: $998,500 · Other+35 moreHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $3,166,565 · Youth DevelopmentHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INCSTRIVE FOUNDATION: $206,950 · Youth DevelopmentSTRIVE FOUNDATIONC5 YOUTH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $150,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentPUBLIC COUNSEL: $953,500 · Crime & LegalPUBLIC CO…Western Center on Law & Poverty Inc: $50,000 · Crime & Legal+4 more: $11,500 · Crime & LegalAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $800,000 · Civil RightsONE FAIR WAGE INC: $100,000 · Civil RightsAFRICA FOUNDATION (USA): $600,000 · InternationalT'RUAH: $60,000 · InternationalA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $25,000 · International+1 more: $12,500 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100,000 · EducationJEWISH WORLD WATCH: $100,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION: $65,000 · EducationTHE PLAY EQUITY FUND: $25,000 · EducationNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $15,000 · EducationTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $219,000 · Philanthropy
Other$5,645,695Youth Development$3,583,515Crime & Legal$1,015,000Civil Rights$900,000International$697,500Education$305,000Philanthropy$219,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $3,166,565 over 5y, 15% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,851,050 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $953,500 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $800,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAFRICA FOUNDATION (USA): $600,000 over 5y, 18% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME: $400,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBET TZEDEK: $350,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE MAYOR'S FUND FOR LOS ANGELES: $219,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSTRIVE FOUNDATION: $206,950 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $200,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetC5 YOUTH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $150,000 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetOneJustice: $150,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetONE FAIR WAGE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetJEWISH WORLD WATCH: $100,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetPF Bresee Foundation: $90,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMUSIC WILL INC: $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH ADVOCACY SERVICES INC: $60,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA: $60,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetT'RUAH: $60,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWestern Center on Law & Poverty Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROJECT ANGEL FOOD: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWRIGHT INSTITUTE LOS ANGELES: $49,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetJEWISH FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetVOLUNTEER COLLECTIVE: $40,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetPOPSTHECLUBCOM INC: $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetA JEWISH VOICE FOR PEACE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST STAR INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTHE PLAY EQUITY FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $18,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEW VILLAGE CHARTER SCHOOL INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetThe Whole Child - Mental Health & Housing Services: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetABILITYFIRST: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NARRATIVE METHOD GROUP: $10,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVISTA DEL MAR CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLegal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUREAU OF JEWISH EDUCATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Liberty Hill Foundati…The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…The Ahmanson Foundati…The Rosalinde and Art…The Rose Hills Founda…The California Endowm…The Mark Hughes Found…La Clippers FoundationThe Los Angeles Dodge…
California Community FoundationCA32.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rosalinde and Arthur Gilbert Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The California Endowment · The Mark Hughes Foundation · La Clippers Foundation · The Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Audrey Irmas Foundation for Social Justice funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Audrey Irmas Foundation for Social Justice. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Audrey Irmas Foundation for Social Justice?

    Find your warmest path to The Audrey Irmas Foundation for Social Justice through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Audrey Irmas Foundation for Social Justice’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home