· Private foundation
The Mark Hughes Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $415k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLAY EQUITY FUND | $75,000 |
| WESTSIDE FOOD BANK | $50,000 |
| WENDE MUSEUM OF THE COLD WAR | $50,000 |
| A PLACE CALLED HOME | $40,000 |
| COLLEGE TRACK | $30,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD | $30,000 |
| LAS FAMILIAS DEL PUEBLO | $30,000 |
| P F BRESEE FOUNDATION | $30,000 |
| UPWARD BOUND HOUSE | $30,000 |
| CAYTON CHILDREN'S MUSEUM (SHAREWELL) | $25,000 |
| ANGEL CITY ALLIANCE (ANGEL CITY SPORTS) | $25,000 |
| CHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE | $25,000 |
| LOS ANGELES POLICE ACADEMY MAGNET SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER | $25,000 |
| JOVENES INC | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $260k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
54 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WFWESTSIDE FOOD BANK7× · 2017–2024 · $300k · revenue +348%
- LFLas Familias Del Pueblo7× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +21%
- TPTHE PLAY EQUITY FUND4× · 2020–2024 · $225k · revenue +70%
Funded once
- SSHAREWELLone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -46%
- LALOS ANGELES JEWISH HOMEone grant, 2020 · $100k
- PPPRESCOTT POPS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRAone grant, 2020 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
La's best provides free supervised before and after-school activities to over 15,000 children at 200 schools in los angeles unified school district (lausd).
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.
The child educational center's mission is to ignite joy, curiosity and compassion through innovative children's programs for all.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
Wns is committed to creating a deeply caring community of lifelong learners that nurtures students from diverse backgrounds to reach their full potential, develop cultural competency, and inspire the world with their curiosity, innovation,…
Crossroads is an independent school for approximately 1,200 students.
Cca is committed to preparing young children to be global citizens who are developmentally well-rounded, emotionally literate, and environmentally conscious.
The mission of tlc is to educate diverse students through a rigorous, standards-based, collegepreparatory program to become conscientious, caring, and responsible 21st century citizens. tlc is grounded in an inclusive vision of teaching…
The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…
To provide a socio-economically, culturally and racially diverse community of students in the heart of Los Angeles with an intellectually challenging experiential learning environment that develops each individual student's confidence,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Para Los Ninos and the most unlike its peers is Ladylike Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF HOLLYWOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Las Familias Del Pueblo ↗
- Who funds THE PLAY EQUITY FUND ↗
- Who funds SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE WENDE MUSEUM OF THE COLD WAR INC ↗
- Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF VENICE ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY ARTS ↗
- Who funds HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds PF Bresee Foundation ↗
- Who funds CASA OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TRACK ↗
- Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds SHAREWELL ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ART CENTER COLLEGE OF DESIGN ↗
- Who funds MAR VISTA FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds GET LIT - WORDS IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗
- Who funds THE LOS ANGELES POLICE ACADEMY MAGNET SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMMON THREADS ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHRIDGE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINDS MATTER OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF EXPO CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF LOS ANGELES INC ↗
- Who funds WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds WEST COAST SPORTS MEDICINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Blind Childrens Center Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Weingart Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Green Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Carrie Estelle Doheny Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Mark Hughes Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Mark Hughes Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Mark Hughes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.