Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Arthur B Wilner Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$57k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$117kReligion$44kAnimals$29kEducation$23kArts & Culture$17kHuman Services$14kFood & Nutrition$13kEnvironment$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $17k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MT WASHINGTON PEDIATRIC HOSPITAL$17,050
BETH EL$6,100
FIRST FRUIT FARMS$4,000
JOHNS HOPKINS$3,000
BLUE WATER BALTIMORE$3,000
GREATER LEWES FOUNDATION$3,000
WELLNESS HOUSE OF ANNAPOLIS$3,000
HORIZON DAY CAMP$2,500
GRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER$2,500
CREATIVE ALLIANCE$2,500
JOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION$1,500
BTST CARES$1,200
UM ST JOSEPH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$1,000
JCC OF GREATER BALTIMORE$1,000
NEW YORK YANKEES FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JUST IN POWER KIDS: $1k → 6%POWER 52 FOUNDATION: $1k → 6%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $3k → 19%HORIZON DAY CAMP: $2k → 19%BEA GADDY FAMILY CENTERS: $1k → 19%BTST CARES: $1k → 19%WEEKEND BACKPACKS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$237k · 26 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
34

Total granted

$237k
$36k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+17%

Still filing today

69%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MW
    Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +24%
  • BA
    BALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS
    4× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +56%
  • II
    Itineris Inc
    4× · 2020–2023 · $8k · revenue +246%

Funded once

  • BR
    BACK RIVER RESTORATION COMMITTEE INgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +187%
  • WP
    WATERFRONT PARTNERSHIP OF BALTIMORE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue -28%
  • CT
    Corner Team Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Arc Baltimore Inc

The arc baltimore supports people with developmental disabilities to lead fulfilling lives with a sense of belonging, purpose, and meaningful relationships.

Human Services
2
Baltimore Corps Inc

To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…

Employment
3
University of Maryland Baltimore Washington Medical System Inc

The mission of umbwms is to provide the highest quality healthcare services to the communities we serve. our vision is to be the preferred regional medical center through nationally recognized quality, personalized service and outstanding…

—
4
Greater Baybrook Alliance Inc

Greater Baybrook Alliance GBA is a non-profit community development organization whose mission is to act as a catalyst and conduit for equitable development and reinvestment in the Brooklyn, Brooklyn Park, Curtis Bay neighborhoods and…

Community Improvement
5
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
6
Blackbird Laboratories Inc

Blackbird laboratories is an independent nonprofit medical research organization based in baltimore that is focused on conducting medical and scientific research in conjunction with nonprofit hospitals and academic institutions,…

Health
7
Visit Baltimore Inc

Visit baltimore is the tourism arm of baltimore, responsible for generating incremental economic benefits through attraction of convention and leisure visitors, and works to provide experience for all guests.

—
8
University of Maryland Medical System Corporation

Umms provides a variety of inpatient/outpatient services to people in the maryland area regardless of their ability to pay. revenues are used to help defray the costs of services.

Health
9
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
10
Greater Baltimore Committee Inc

Greater Baltimore Committee, Inc. is a not-for-profit, civic-interest corporation comprised of business and professional organizations located within the Greater Baltimore Area. Its purpose is to provide a strong, unified and effective…

—
11
The Baltimore Children's Museum Inc

Port discovery children's museum's mission is to connect purposeful play and learning within its walls and beyond.

Arts & Culture
12
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gbmc Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Bethel Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/51
Grantees still filing
29/51
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: $64,725 · HealthMt Washington Pediatric Hospita…LIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $7,500 · HealthLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INCGRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER CENTER INC: $3,500 · HealthANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION: $3,000 · Health+4 more: $3,750 · HealthADELANTE LATINA INC: $11,500 · OtherADELANTE LATINA INCTHE ASSOCIATED: $8,800 · OtherTHE ASSOCIATEDZERO-THE END OF PROSTATE CANCDR: $8,500 · OtherZERO-THE END OF PROSTATE CANCDRJOHNS HOPKINS: $8,500 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINSJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF BALTIMORE INC: $3,800 · OtherTHE NOLAN ROBINSON FOUNDATION: $3,500 · OtherItineris Inc: $8,425 · OtherItineris IncFIRST FRUITS FARM INC: $5,500 · OtherFIRST FRUITS FARM INC+39 more: $43,716 · Other+39 moreThe Bethel Corporation: $30,580 · Housing & ShelterThe Bethel …BALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS: $24,500 · AnimalsBALTIMORE A…DAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC: $4,500 · AnimalsDAYS END FA…THE GREATER LEWES FOUNDATION: $9,000 · EnvironmentBLUE WATER BALTIMORE: $5,000 · EnvironmentBACK RIVER RESTORATION COMMITTEE IN: $2,500 · EnvironmentASSOCIATION FOR NATURE-BASED EDUCATION INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $1,000 · EnvironmentJOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCREATIVE ALLIANCE INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureArtsCentric Inc: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $200 · Arts & CultureWEEKEND BACKPACKS BALTIMORE INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesBTST CARES INC: $1,200 · Human ServicesJust In Power Kids Inc: $1,000 · Human ServicesPOWER52 INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesBEA GADDYS FAMILY CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human Services
Health$82,475Other$102,241Housing & Shelter$30,580Animals$29,000Environment$19,500Arts & Culture$15,700Human Services$13,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: $64,725 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bethel Corporation: $30,580 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS: $24,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetADELANTE LATINA INC: $11,500 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetTHE GREATER LEWES FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetItineris Inc: $8,425 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJOSHUA M FREEMAN FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE HEALTH INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCREATIVE ALLIANCE INC: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFIRST FRUITS FARM INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE WATER BALTIMORE: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWEEKEND BACKPACKS BALTIMORE INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDAYS END FARM HORSE RESCUE INC: $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF BALTIMORE INC: $3,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRASSROOTS CRISIS INTERVENTION CENTER CENTER INC: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANNAPOLIS WELLNESS CORPORATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBACK RIVER RESTORATION COMMITTEE IN: $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWATERFRONT PARTNERSHIP OF BALTIMORE INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaltimore Urban Baseball Association Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCorner Team Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR NATURE-BASED EDUCATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetExecutive Alliance Inc: $1,760 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetHOMELESS PERSONS REPRESENTATION PROJECT INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL FAMILY RESILIENCY CENTER INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJust In Power Kids Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetABILITIES NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS DOWN SYNDROME CONGRESS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP YAVNEH INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK YANKEES FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOWER52 INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetI AM MENTALITY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDWARD J FRIEDMAN FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBEA GADDYS FAMILY CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEW YORK RESTORATION PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES OF SPINAL MUSCULAR ATROPHY DBA CURE SMA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEMICY SCHOOL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CHARITIES INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMY NEIGHBORS FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND ACADEMY OF SCIENCES: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEWES FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD37.5× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Marion I & Henry J Knott Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Foundation · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · The RCM&D Foundation · Herbert Bearman Foundation · The Bunting Family Foundation · Fund for Educational Excellence Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Arthur B Wilner Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Arthur B Wilner Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 150%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • POWER52 Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Lewes Fire Department Inc: 41% of income from government
  • First Fruits Farm Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Joshua M Freeman Foundation: 20% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Maryland Academy of Sciences: 9% of income from government
  • Living Classrooms Foundation: 7% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Abilities Network Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Jewish Community Center of Baltimore Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Waterfront Partnership of Baltimore Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Lifebridge Health Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Greater Lewes Foundation: 1% of income from government
  • Mt Washington Pediatric Hospital Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
15get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Arthur B Wilner Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Arthur B Wilner Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Arthur B Wilner’s filings →

More from the funding graph