· Private foundation
The Art Laboe Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k36 grants · $120k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $58k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KIDZ COME FIRST | $57,500 |
| Animal Samaritans | $10,000 |
| F C CANCER FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| Living Desert | $10,000 |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS | $5,000 |
| Guide Dogs of the Desert | $5,000 |
| PAULY'S PROJECT | $5,000 |
| TURNING POINT USA | $5,000 |
| HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Palm Springs Animal Shelter | $5,000 |
| KLOWNSKI FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $4,500 |
| Alley Cat Rescue | $4,000 |
| Future Roots | $4,000 |
| Alley Cat Allies | $4,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
69 repeat relationships — 34 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ASAnimal Samaritans8× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +158%
- LDLIVING DESERT THE6× · 2020–2025 · $31k · revenue +100%
- ACAlley Cat Allies Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $23k · revenue +118%
Funded once
- EFEKG FOUNDATION CORPORATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k
- JOJERRY ORTIZ MEMORIAL BOXING AND YOUTH FITNESS GYM FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue 0% · 26% of their budget
- EMEl Monte Police Officers Associationone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue -67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…
A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.
All about animals rescue's mission is no more homeless pets.
World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…
To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.
Protection of animal rights
The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…
The aspca's mission, as stated by founder henry bergh in 1866, is "to provide effective means for the prevention of cruelty to animals throughout the united states." the aspca was founded on the belief that animals are entitled to kind and…
Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.
We are dedicated to building a community responsible for pet stewardship and humane treatment of animals.
Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Paulys Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 109 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Museum of Broadcast Communications ↗
- Who funds Last Chance for Animals ↗
- Who funds Animal Samaritans ↗
- Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
- Who funds Alley Cat Allies Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF CATS INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROCK AND ROLL HALL OF FAME AND MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds SCREEN ACTORS GUILD-AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ARTISTS FOUND ↗
- Who funds Scleroderma Research Foundation ↗
- Who funds FUTURE ROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds TIGER HAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds GUIDE DOGS OF THE DESERT ↗
- Who funds HAZELDEN BETTY FORD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WILDLIFE WAYSTATION ↗
- Who funds THE ZACHARY & ELIZABETH M FISHER CENTER FOR ALZHEIMER'S RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ACTORS AND OTHERS FOR ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds KITTYLAND CAT AND KITTEN RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds Alley Cat Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds BOO2BULLYING INC ↗
- Who funds PAULYS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ALL SEATED IN A BARN ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMERS COACHELLA VALLEY ↗
- Who funds F C Cancer Foundation A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corp ↗
- Who funds DAP Health Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: HN and Frances C Berger Foundation · Bighorn Golf Club Charities Inc · The Auen Foundation · The Coeta and Donald Barker Foundation · Regional Access Project Foundation · The Grace Helen Spearman Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · Houston Family Foundation · California Community Foundation · Charity Works · The Champions Volunteer Foundation · Anderson Childrens Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Art Laboe Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Art Laboe Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Art Laboe Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.