Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Androcles Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.2M
Granted FY2023
97
Grants FY2023
19
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Philanthropy$14MReligion$1.6MAnimals$1.4MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$1.1MEducation$885kRecreation & Sports$830kInternational$795kOther$0
02FY2023 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 97 grants below total $6,411,532 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $7,194,032 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $782,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k12 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k65 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k17 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+3 grants · $3.2M
$20,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$44M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Scripps Howard Foundation$1,137,720
Scripps Howard Foundation$1,062,500
Scripps Howard Foundation$959,085
Scripps Howard Foundation$243,234
Ceres Community Project$165,000
FIC$150,000
Scripps Howard Foundation$149,198
Challenged Athletes Foundation$125,000
Planned Parenthood$120,000
Razom (a/k/a Razom for Ukraine)$100,000
International Center for Journalists, Inc.$100,000
Russian Orthodox Church of Christ the Savior$100,000
Scripps Howard Foundation$90,000
World Central Kitchen$90,000
Scripps Howard Foundation$89,795
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$24M · 109 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

109 repeat relationships — 74 still active in FY2023, 35 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109
44

Total granted

$24M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+31%

Still filing today

73%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $568k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    The Scripps Howard Foundation
    5× · 2019–2023 · $12M · revenue +365% · 32% of their budget
  • THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT
    5× · 2019–2023 · $665k · revenue +367%
  • CA
    CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $555k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRY
    one grant, 2019 · $308k · revenue -54%
  • CA
    Challenged Athletes Foundation
    one grant, 2022 · $105k
  • BA
    BOISE ADAPTIVE SNOWSPORT EDUCATION
    one grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +19% · 49% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
2
The California Wildlife Center

The california wildlife center (cwc) takes responsibility for the protection of all native wildlife through rehabilitiation, education and conservation. as the los angeles area's premier wildlife medical care and rehabilitation facility,…

Health
3
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
4
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
5
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
6
San Francisco Zoological Society

To connect all people with wildlife, inspire caring for nature, and advance conservation action.

Animals
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
United Animal Nations Dba Redrover

To bring animals out of crisis and strengthen the bond between people and animals through emergency sheltering, disaster relief services, financial assistance and education. redrover accomplishes its mission by engaging volunteers and…

9
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
10
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

11
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
12
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Mexico Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Bradley Zankel Foundationinc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPrivate Grantmaking Foundat…Christian Outreach Ministri…Urban Agriculture EducationAffordable Housing Construc…Volunteer Fire & RescueCollege Foundation SupportWomen's Empowerment Organiz…Christian Youth CampsAffordable Housing Developm…Community Theater CompaniesDomestic Violence and Sexua…Public School District Foun…Immigrant and Latino Integr…Ymca Community CentersCommunity Arts CentersVeteran Support ServicesYouth Development CentersChildhood Cancer SupportPublic Library SupportEarly Childhood Care CentersSenior Support ServicesLocal History MuseumsEnvironmental Advocacy and …Community Hospital SystemsGovernment Accountability &…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Animal Rescue and ShelterYouth Sports ProgramsFood Pantries and AssistanceCommunity FoundationsUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr16%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/121
the rest of the field
13%
240,394/1,819,444

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

03the grantee network

113 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 113 of the 175 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

6
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
29
Early backer (in before they grew)
109/113
Grantees still filing
86/113
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

The Scripps Howard Foundation — $12,489,330 · PhilanthropyThe Scripps Howard FoundationCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $472,500 · Philanthropy+10 more — $757,500 · Philanthropy+10 moreFJC — $1,075,000 · OtherFJCPlanned Parenthood — $395,000 · OtherPlanned Parenthood+106 more — $5,670,000 · Other+106 moreTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $665,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $555,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $190,000 · Human ServicesMIDDLE WAY HOUSE INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT — $60,000 · Human Services+5 more — $115,000 · Human ServicesRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $150,000 · AnimalsSPANISH MUSTANG FOUNDATION — $135,000 · AnimalsSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $120,000 · AnimalsMARLEY'S MUTTS DOG RESCUE INC — $80,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $75,000 · AnimalsFOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT INC) — $65,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN WILD HORSE PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN — $60,000 · AnimalsSONOMA COUNTY WILDLIFE RESCUE — $60,000 · AnimalsTHE BIRD RESCUE CENTER — $50,000 · AnimalsSAVE A PET ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $45,000 · AnimalsDOGWOOD ANIMAL RESCUE PROJECT INC — $45,000 · AnimalsCENTER FOR AMERICAS FIRST HORSE — $40,000 · AnimalsATLANTA WILD ANIMAL RESCUE EFFORT INC — $40,000 · Animals+8 more — $160,000 · AnimalsWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $350,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $205,000 · InternationalTHE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC — $170,000 · InternationalUnited States Association for UNHCR — $140,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC — $100,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF — $60,000 · InternationalPOLARIS PROJECT — $40,000 · InternationalBradley Zankel Foundation — $450,000 · HealthVHL ALLIANCE INC — $135,000 · HealthWEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $120,000 · HealthSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION — $60,000 · HealthNO LIMITS FOUNDATION D/B/A CAMP NO LIMITS — $60,000 · HealthCANCER FOUNDATION FOR NEW MEXICO — $40,000 · Health+5 more — $90,000 · HealthREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $190,000 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC — $85,000 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK — $60,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD CENTER INC — $60,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST INLAND NORTHWEST — $50,000 · Food & NutritionProject Open Hand — $30,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$13,719,330Other$7,140,000Human Services$1,660,000Animals$1,125,000International$1,065,000Health$955,000Food & Nutrition$475,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Scripps Howard Foundation — $12,489,330 over 5y, 32% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $665,000 over 5y, 4.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $555,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $472,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBradley Zankel Foundation — $450,000 over 5y, 86% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $350,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRY — $307,500 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $230,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $205,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS — $200,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SONOMA COUNTY — $200,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $190,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $190,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetRivers Wish Animal Sanctuary — $185,000 over 5y, 31% of budgetTHE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC — $170,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $160,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY — $150,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR — $140,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPANISH MUSTANG FOUNDATION — $135,000 over 4y, 84% of budgetVHL ALLIANCE INC — $135,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress — $120,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetKQED INC — $120,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC — $120,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GIVING BACK FUND — $120,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS INC — $120,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUrban Arts Partnership — $110,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetLaguna De Santa Rosa Foundation — $100,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetRAZOM INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ocean Foundation — $90,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $80,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMARLEY'S MUTTS DOG RESCUE INC — $80,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetBurn Institute — $75,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetScripps Howard Fund — $75,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMIDDLE WAY HOUSE INC — $75,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetVANESSA BEHAN — $75,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF SONOMA COUNTY — $70,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSebastopol Area Senior Center — $70,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetFOOD ANIMAL CONCERNS TRUST (FACT INC) — $65,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetDAVE MCGILLIVRAY FINISH STRONG FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetSYRIAN AMERICAN MEDICAL SOCIETY FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE — $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN WILD HORSE PRESERVATION CAMPAIGN — $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Scripps Howard Foundation
  • Who funds THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Bradley Zankel Foundation
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE WINE COUNTRY
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC
  • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE TO END HOMELESSNESS
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SONOMA COUNTY
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA
  • Who funds REDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK
  • Who funds Rivers Wish Animal Sanctuary
  • Who funds THE INT'L CENTER FOR JOURNALISTS INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds RANCHO COASTAL HUMANE SOCIETY
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR
  • Who funds SPANISH MUSTANG FOUNDATION
  • Who funds VHL ALLIANCE INC
  • Who funds The Center for Investigative Reporting formrly Foundation for National Progress
  • Who funds KQED INC
  • Who funds SANTA FE ANIMAL SHELTER AND HUMANE SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds THE GIVING BACK FUND
  • Who funds WEST COUNTY HEALTH CENTERS INC
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations
  • Who funds Urban Arts Partnership
  • Who funds Laguna De Santa Rosa Foundation
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds RAZOM INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Community FoundationCA28× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · The Heck Foundation · Redwood Credit Union Community Fund Inc · Neil & Amelia McDaniel Charitable Trust Dtd 11/01/77 · Weinreb Pilecki Segal Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · Innovia Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Androcles Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Androcles Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 175 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $7.8M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph