Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stranahan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
27
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Education$9.1MHuman Services$3.9MCommunity Improvement$3.6MEnvironment$2.8MHealth$2.1MFood & Nutrition$1.9MArts & Culture$1.3MYouth Development$1.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k39 grants · $1.3M
  • $50k–250k25 grants · $2.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$35,000
Median grant
27
States reached
$124M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC$250,000
EDVANCE$150,000
ALL OUR KIN INC$150,000
NEW PROFIT INC$150,000
SOBRATO EARLY ACADEMIC LANGUAGE PROGRAM$150,000
SAVANNA INSTITUTE$149,000
EARLY YEARS INC$125,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR FAMILY CHILD CARE FOUNDATION$100,000
URBAN SPROUTS$100,000
JEREMIAH PROGRAM$100,000
THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP$100,000
FELTON INSTITUTE$100,000
SANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$100,000
COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE OF S INDIANA$100,000
REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA$86,800
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $50k → 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WICHITA: $48k → 16%URBAN SPROUTS: $100k → 11%ADELANTE MUJERES: $50k → 8%COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE OF S INDIANA: $100k → 15%HELPLINE HOUSE: $35k → 10%CAROLE ROBERTSON CENTER FOR LEARNING: $50k → 14%REGINALD S LOURIE CENTER FOR INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN: $250k → 8%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $35k → 10%EDUCARE DC: $50k → 14%COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE OF S INDIANA: $100k → 15%HELPLINE HOUSE: $35k → 10%CAROLE ROBERTSON CENTER FOR LEARNING: $50k → 14%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $35k → 10%YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $50k → 16%WINGS FOR KIDS: $35k → 12%COMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE OF S INDIANA: $100k → 15%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INCORPORATED: $35k → 9%HELPLINE HOUSE: $35k → 10%THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL EAST JEFFERSON COUNTY CONFERENCE: $35k → 11%THE FAMILY PARTNERSHIP: $100k → 11%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INCORPORATED: $35k → 9%THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL EAST JEFFERSON COUNTY CONFERENCE: $35k → 11%EMPOWERMT: $35k → 9%AVOW CARE SERVICES INCORPORATED: $35k → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INCORPORATED: $35k → 9%AVOW CARE SERVICES INCORPORATED: $35k → 10%YWCA MISSOULA: $35k → 9%EMPOWERMT: $35k → 9%MIDNIGHT MISSION THE: $35k → 14%MIDNIGHT MISSION THE: $35k → 14%YOUTH SHELTERS AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $35k → 12%THE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL EAST JEFFERSON COUNTY CONFERENCE: $35k → 11%EMPOWERMT: $35k → 9%MIDNIGHT MISSION THE: $35k → 14%YOUTH SHELTERS AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $35k → 12%FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $35k → 10%ABILITYFIRST: $35k → 14%YOUTH SHELTERS AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $35k → 12%ABILITYFIRST: $35k → 14%YOUTH SHELTERS AND FAMILY SERVICES INC: $35k → 12%BABY UNIVERSITY: $35k → 18%HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC: $35k → 10%HELP CENTER INC: $35k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $35k → 10%FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC: $35k → 10%AREA OFFICE ON AGING OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO INC: $35k → 18%BABY UNIVERSITY: $35k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 135 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

135 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 88 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

135
52

Total granted

$25M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+18%

Still filing today

90%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $986k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHealthEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +27%
  • JF
    JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +3%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    3× · 2020–2022 · $719k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • RS
    REGINALD S LOURIE CENTER FOR INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN INC
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue +9%
  • LF
    LENA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $150k · revenue -44%
  • BB
    BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +122%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
2
Fielding Graduate University

We provide exemplary interdisciplinary programs for a community of scholar-practitioners within a distributed learning model grounded in student-driven inquiry and leading to enhanced knowledge.

—
3
University Cooperative School

We take a joyful, community-oriented approach to raising engaged citizens, deep learners, and brave adventurers with the skills, creativity, and heart needed to better the world.

—
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
6
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
7
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
Great Mn Schools

We believe that great schools are the cornerstone of a just and thriving community. ensuring that every child is able to attend a school that works is our moral and social imperative - our children deserve no less.

Education
12
National Association of Corporate Directors

We empower directors and transform boards to be future ready.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mima Music. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLocal Food System Organizat…Independent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Cancer Support ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesAffordable Housing Developm…Immigrant Worker SupportYmca Youth DevelopmentSenior Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development CentersSchool District FoundationsPregnancy Support ServicesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Elementary Literacy TutoringLocal History MuseumsCommunity College Foundatio…Domestic Violence ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Community Arts CentersYouth Sports ProgramsCommunity FoundationsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%27%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/193
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,372

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

187 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 187 of the 210 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
35
Early backer (in before they grew)
185/187
Grantees still filing
138/187
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $1,000,000 · EducationJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN IN…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $718,778 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDA…THE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION — $600,000 · EducationTHE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATIONUniversity of Miami — $600,000 · EducationUniversity of MiamiVanderbilt University — $439,228 · EducationVanderbilt UniversityAtlanta Speech School Inc — $435,259 · EducationAtlanta Speech School IncALL OUR KIN INC — $335,000 · EducationSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $300,000 · EducationEDVANCE COLLEGE — $300,000 · EducationSOBRATO EARLY ACADEMIC LANGUAGE PROGRAM — $300,000 · Education+30 more — $2,857,644 · Education+30 moreSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED — $663,525 · OtherSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPO…RECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA — $600,000 · OtherRECTOR & VISITORS OF THE UNIVERSITY…UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $599,999 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUS…LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION — $366,287 · Other+82 more — $6,748,356 · Other+82 moreTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $2,750,000 · Community ImprovementTHIRD SECTOR N…NEW PROFIT INC — $500,000 · Community ImprovementNEW PROFIT INCINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE — $280,000 · Community ImprovementINSTITUTE FOR …+5 more — $187,500 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC — $300,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY …REGINALD S LOURIE CENTER FOR INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $250,000 · Human ServicesREGINALD S…HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC — $185,000 · Human ServicesHUMAN RESO…FAMILY PROMISE OF GALLATIN VALLEY INC — $140,000 · Human ServicesEDUCARE DC — $140,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SHELTERS & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $140,000 · Human ServicesBABY UNIVERSITY — $140,000 · Human ServicesTHE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL EAST JEFFERSON COUNTY CONFERENCE — $105,000 · Human ServicesTHE MIDNIGHT MISSION — $105,000 · Human ServicesHELPLINE HOUSE — $105,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWER MT — $105,000 · Human ServicesNeighborhood House INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesHATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES — $105,000 · Human ServicesThe Family Partnership — $100,000 · Human ServicesCarole Robertson Center for Learning — $100,000 · Human ServicesURBAN SPROUTS CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $100,000 · Human Services+11 more — $528,379 · Human Services+11 moreSAVANNA INSTITUTE — $596,772 · EnvironmentNEW VENTURE FUND — $255,000 · EnvironmentQUIVIRA COALITION INC — $200,000 · EnvironmentGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST — $155,000 · EnvironmentCONNECTICUT AUDUBON SOCIETY INC — $140,000 · EnvironmentHEART OF THE ROCKIES INITIATIVE — $140,000 · EnvironmentPARTNERS FOR CLEAN STREAMS — $137,400 · EnvironmentECO-CYCLE INC — $120,000 · EnvironmentFOREST CONSERVANCY — $105,000 · EnvironmentSOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC — $100,000 · EnvironmentBREWSTER CONSERVATION TRUST — $82,500 · Environment+4 more — $165,000 · EnvironmentChildren's Hospital Corporation — $305,828 · HealthTHE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC — $222,186 · HealthDAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $172,862 · HealthECDYSIS FOUNDATION — $150,000 · HealthPROJECT ANGEL FOOD — $140,000 · HealthKids Cancer Foundation Inc — $105,000 · HealthELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION — $105,000 · HealthGOOD GRIEF OF NORTHWEST OHIO INC — $70,000 · HealthHANLEY CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 · HealthRICHARD J CARON FOUNDATION — $70,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $60,000 · Health+3 more — $85,000 · HealthRodale Institute — $570,000 · Food & NutritionLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC — $165,000 · Food & NutritionKISS THE GROUND — $150,000 · Food & NutritionMAD AGRICULTURE — $140,000 · Food & NutritionPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc — $140,000 · Food & NutritionFARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC — $135,000 · Food & NutritionNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOCIATION MA CHAPTER INC — $70,000 · Food & Nutrition+3 more — $85,000 · Food & Nutrition
Education$7,885,909Other$8,978,167Community Improvement$3,717,500Human Services$2,753,379Environment$2,196,672Health$1,555,876Food & Nutrition$1,455,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC — $2,750,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $1,000,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $718,778 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHWEST HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INCORPORATED — $663,525 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetTHE WILDFLOWER FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetUniversity of Miami — $600,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAVANNA INSTITUTE — $596,772 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetRodale Institute — $570,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetNEW PROFIT INC — $500,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetVanderbilt University — $439,228 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAtlanta Speech School Inc — $435,259 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetALL OUR KIN INC — $335,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $305,828 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA FE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetEDVANCE COLLEGE — $300,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY COORDINATED CHILD CARE OF SOUTHERN INDIANA INC — $300,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetSOBRATO EARLY ACADEMIC LANGUAGE PROGRAM — $300,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LOCAL SELF RELIANCE — $280,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $255,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEARLY YEARS INC — $250,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetREGINALD S LOURIE CENTER FOR INFANTS AND YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMake Way For Books — $245,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetYOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KALAMAZOO MI — $225,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE MEDSTAR-GEORGETOWN MEDICAL CENTER INC — $222,186 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetQUIVIRA COALITION INC — $200,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetNational Association For Family Child Care — $200,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetTHE UNIV OF MONTANA-WESTERN FOUNDATION — $196,260 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL OF DISTRICT IX INC — $185,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $172,862 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetREALIZE BRADENTON INC — $171,500 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetLOAVES & FISHES FOOD PANTRY INC — $165,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetLA COMPOST — $160,000 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetHIGHSCOPE EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetPRACTICAL FARMERS OF IOWA — $160,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGALLATIN VALLEY LAND TRUST — $155,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLIGHT HOUSE STUDIO INC — $155,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY INITIATIVE — $150,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLENA FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetKISS THE GROUND — $150,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFor Providers by Providers Louisiana — $150,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetECDYSIS FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetCROSSCUT MOUNTAIN SPORTS CENTER — $145,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetHAVEN — $145,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTOLEDO SCIENCE CENTER — $144,580 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTHWEST OHIO — $142,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBootstraps to Share of Tucson Inc — $140,000 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetBIG SKY YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC — $140,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetMAD AGRICULTURE — $140,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Toledo Community Foun…The O-I Charities Fou…The Andersons Fund Su…United Way of Greater…Toledo Community Foun…The Stranahan Support…John Henry Eldred Jr …Entelco FoundationAndersons FoundationDana Charitable Found…Montana Community Fou…Promedica Health Syst…
Toledo Community Foundation IncOH56.5× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Toledo Community Foundation Inc · The O-I Charities Foundation · The Andersons Fund Supporting Organization · United Way of Greater Toledo · Toledo Community Foundation Inc Seneca Fund · The Stranahan Supporting Organization · John Henry Eldred Jr Foundation · Entelco Foundation · Andersons Foundation · Dana Charitable Foundation · Montana Community Foundation Inc · Promedica Health System Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stranahan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 100%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Reginald S Lourie Center for Infants and Young Children Inc — 45% of income from government
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Adelante Mujeres — 31% of income from government
  • Housing Assistance Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Brewster Conservation Trust — 8% of income from government
  • University of Miami — 5% of income from government
  • Zumix Inc — 5% of income from government
  • Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
  • David Lawrence Mental Health Center Inc — 1% of income from government
  • All Our Kin Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Connecticut Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Avow Hospice Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
66report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stranahan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stranahan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 210 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home