Skip to content

· Private foundation

The 1687 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
117
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$580k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$3.2MEducation$2.5MPublic Benefit$2.1MHealth$1.4MReligion$1.2MScience & Tech$1.1MRecreation & Sports$1.0MInternational$443kOther$0
02FY2024 · 117 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $138k
  • $10k–50k57 grants · $1.1M
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $2.0M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.4M
$14,470
Median grant
9
States reached
$162M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION - AGREEMENT 2024$580,000
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION - AGREEMENT GRANT$500,000
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC - GRANT$350,000
HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL - GRANT$240,000
LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES - GRANT$180,563
CAMP ABLE OF BUFFALO GAP - ABILENE GIVES FUNDRAISER$150,495
OPEN DOOR - 2024 MOBILE UNIT EXPENSES$123,063
ELAM MINISTRIES - GRANT$120,000
MERCY GATE MINISTRIES-MINDY - GRANT$100,000
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION - GRANT$100,000
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSO - DONATION- SAMARITANS PURSE$100,000
TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC - THE 1687 FOUNDATION SCHOLARSHIP$100,000
OLDEN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMEN - GRANT$100,000
CENTER FOR ASD - MATCHING GRANT$75,000
WMK LLC - VAN DONATION FOR HEATHER$69,380
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $621k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DISABILTY RESOURCE INC: $3k → 22%GENERAL TOMMY FRANKS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE AND MUSEUM: $20k → 23%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION - GRANT: $40k → 15%MARBRIDGE FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%HOMEMADE HOPE FOR HOMLESS CHILDREN: $20k → 16%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $18k → 15%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES - GRANT: $25k → 12%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%SPOKEN WORLDWIDE: $13k → 14%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $20k → 12%SPOKEN WORLDWIDE: $10k → 14%HOSPICE OF EL PASO: $25k → 21%NARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $15k → 15%SPOKEN WORLDWIDE: $10k → 14%CENTRAL TEXAS PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $5k → 17%SPOKEN WORLDWIDE: $10k → 14%HOSPICE OF EL PASO INC: $25k → 21%THE ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $5k → 17%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES: $15k → 12%THE ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $4k → 17%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILY: $10k → 12%THE ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $3k → 17%THE ARK DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $2k → 17%CENTERS FOR CHILDREN & FAMILY: $10k → 12%EMBRACE GRACE: $28k → 11%EMBRACE GRACE: $21k → 11%EMBRACE GRACE: $15k → 11%EMBRACE GRACE: $2k → 11%SHARING HANDS A RESPITE EXPERIENCE INC: $10k → 14%ENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER: $50k → 11%ENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER - GRANT: $50k → 11%ENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER: $40k → 11%ENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER: $35k → 11%ENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

OR
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.6M · 67 repeat orgs$9.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +70% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

67 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 63 since wound down; 112 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

67
95

Total granted

$6.6M
$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+19%

Still filing today

48%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EASTLAND COUNTY OPEN DOOR
    5× · 2018–2022 · $571k · revenue +35% · 28% of their budget
  • LC
    LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    5× · 2018–2022 · $521k · revenue +154%
  • CP
    CHASE'S PLACE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $315k · revenue +79%

Funded once

  • MA
    MILITARY AND GENERAL PUBLIC
    one grant, 2017 · $2.0M
  • TT
    TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION-VEGETATION MONITORING & MGMT
    one grant, 2022 · $370k
  • SE
    SPECIAL EVENTS FOR VETERANS CHARITIES AND DISABLED
    one grant, 2017 · $276k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tip of Texas Family Outreach Inc

To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.

—
2
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
3
Lubbock Family Outreach Center Inc Dba Family Guidance & Outreach Center

The Family Guidance & Outreach Center of Lubbock is dedicated to the prevention of child abuse and neglect and supporting, mentoring, and educating parents.

Human Services
4
Pregnancy Resources of Abilene Inc

Pregnancy Resources' mission is to inspire hope and unconditionally love everyone we serve by empowering them to thrive through compassionate support and positive solutions.

Civil Rights
5
Central Texas Children's Home

To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.

Human Services
6
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
7
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
8
Childrens Advocacy Center of West Texas Inc

The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.

Crime & Legal
9
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
10
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
11
Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement
12
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of North Texas; the most unlike its peers is Convenience Distributors Ok. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 275 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
26
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/67
Grantees still filing
52/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MILITARY AND GENERAL PUBLIC: $1,970,521 · OtherMILITARY AND GENERAL PUBLICTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION - AGREEMENT 2024: $580,000 · OtherEASTLAND COUNTY OPEN DOOR: $570,521 · OtherTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION - AGREEMENT GRANT: $500,000 · OtherTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC - GRANT: $450,000 · Other+161 more: $8,844,140 · Other+161 moreCHASE'S PLACE INC: $315,000 · EducationBYNUM SCHOOL: $247,500 · EducationTEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · EducationMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $55,000 · EducationRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $40,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $35,000 · Education+2 more: $30,000 · EducationLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $520,800 · ReligionElam Ministries: $146,000 · ReligionSPARROW CLUBS USA: $30,000 · ReligionENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER: $200,000 · Human ServicesNARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $102,500 · Human ServicesCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesEmbrace Grace Inc: $65,900 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF EL PASO INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesRAFFA CLINIC: $47,500 · Human ServicesT4 Global Inc: $42,500 · Human Services+7 more: $97,500 · Human ServicesParents Defeating Autism Today: $155,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $87,500 · HealthPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $50,000 · HealthMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $32,500 · HealthABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY: $97,125 · Youth DevelopmentRedirectional Outreach Program Efforts for Youth: $17,590 · Youth DevelopmentPermian Basin - Be The Change Sandra Candia: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentTADSAW INC: $55,000 · AnimalsAMERICAN QUARTER HORSE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Animals
Other$12,915,182Education$822,500Religion$696,800Human Services$685,900Health$325,000Youth Development$129,715Animals$105,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTLAND COUNTY OPEN DOOR: $570,521 over 5y, 28% of budgetLIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $520,800 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCHASE'S PLACE INC: $315,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetBYNUM SCHOOL: $247,500 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER: $200,000 over 5y, 39% of budgetHEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC: $198,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetHOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC: $175,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetParents Defeating Autism Today: $155,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetElam Ministries: $146,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS: $125,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetNARROW GATE FOUNDATION: $102,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetRemember the Alamo Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetTEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetCharis Hills Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetABILENE YOUTH SPORTS AUTHORITY: $97,125 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $87,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF ABILENE: $85,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCENTERS FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC: $80,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAGAPE CHRISTIAN SERVICES: $80,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetHEROBOX INC: $75,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetEmbrace Grace Inc: $65,900 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTADSAW INC: $55,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetHOSPICE OF EL PASO INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN QUARTER HORSE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSNOWBALL EXPRESS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetPARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAFFA CLINIC: $47,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetHOPE HOME MINISTRY: $45,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetT4 Global Inc: $42,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetRECORDING LIBRARY OF WEST TEXAS: $40,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetBobwhite Brigade: $40,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF EL PASO INC: $40,000 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetWEST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS: $35,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIGHTY OAKS FOUNDATION: $32,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSPARROW CLUBS USA: $30,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetREFLECTION MINISTRIES OF TEXAS INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF HOUSTON INC: $25,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPROJECT VIDA: $24,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE PERMIAN BASIN INC: $20,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHomemade Hope for Homeless Children: $20,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetGENERAL TOMMY FRANKS LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE AND MUSEUM: $20,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAgape Gospel Mission Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 17% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EASTLAND COUNTY OPEN DOOR ↗
  • Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds BYNUM SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds ENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER ↗
  • Who funds HEARTBEAT INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF MIDLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds Parents Defeating Autism Today ↗
  • Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
  • Who funds NARROW GATE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS RANGERS BASEBALL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Charis Hills Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Abell-Hanger FoundationTX35.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation · Beal Foundation · Permian Basin Area Foundation · Helen Greathouse Charitable Trust · Pevehouse Family Foundation · Scharbauer Foundation Inc · The Henry Foundation · Warren Charitable Foundation · Yarborough Foundation · James a Buddy Davidson Charitable Foundation · Wayne & Jo Ann Moore Charitable Foundation · United Way of Midland Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The 1687 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The 1687 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The 1687 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The 1687 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 275 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 1687’s filings →

    More from the funding graph