Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Tewa Women United

Collective journey- through relation-tivity we embody courageous spaces that center indigenous women and girls to connect ancestral knowingness, healing strengths and lifeways for the wellbeing of all.

$67k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202023.

Human Services$37kCivil Rights$27kCrime & Legal$20kPublic Benefit$12kCommunity Improvement$12kHealth$9kEnvironment$7kYouth Development$6kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$66,862
Median grant
1
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VARIOUS$66,862
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YOUTH IN POWER: $20k → 15%TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NM: $11k → 14%HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION: $6k → 17%NEW MEXIO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER: $16k → 13%AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTE: $6k → 14%ESPERANZA UNITED: $6k → 14%FREEDOM INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Women Rising Indigeous Women Rising
2
Fuerza Y Union Multiple

Our mission is to build stronger, healthier communities, rich in values and culture. We offer a safe space to access services with mutual and equal respect, working with and for the Latinx community.

Community Improvement
3
The Savila Collaborative

The svila collaborative dba centro savila is a treatment program devoted to the recovery and healing of individuals, families, and communities experiencing emotional and psychological distress. our vision is to create a healthy, engaged,…

Health
4
Latinos in Virginia Empowerment Center

Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.

Crime & Legal
5
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

6
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
7
Minnesota Indian Women's Sexual Assualt Coalition

Through unity we will strengthen our voices and build resources to create awareness and eliminate sexual violence against indian women and children. we will vigorously apply our efforts toward influencing social change and reclaim our…

Crime & Legal
8
New Mexico Voices for Children

To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexicos children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…

Civil Rights
9
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
10
Native Dads Network Inc

NDN provides psychoeducation courses, counseling, advocacy support, community eventsand conferences to Indigenous / Native American communities living in California. NDN trained staff provide culturally centered substance abuse prevention…

Human Services
11
Ujima the National Center On Violence Against Women

To mobilize the community to respond to and end domestic, sexual and community violence in the black community. we actualize this mission through research, public awareness and community engagement, and resource development. ujima serves…

Crime & Legal
12
The International Institute On Race Equality and Human Rights

The international institute on race, equality and human rights contributes to the promotion and defense of human rights, through training, technical assistance, advocacy, and strategic litigation conducted at the regional and international…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Youth Visions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUTH VISIONS INC — $19,500 · Human ServicesYOUTH VISIONS INCNEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER — $15,638 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTERTHE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO — $10,500 · Human ServicesTHE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICOSISTERSONG INC — $10,250 · Human ServicesSISTERSONG INCHmong American Womens Association Inc — $5,500 · Human ServicesHmong American Womens Association IncESPERANZA UNITED — $5,500 · Human ServicesESPERANZA UNITEDNATIVE AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL PARENT RESOURCES INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesNATIVE AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL PARENT RESOURCES…FREEDOM INC — $5,500 · Human ServicesFREEDOM INCVARIOUS — $66,862 · OtherVARIOUSBARRIOS UNIDOS — $12,000 · Public BenefitPARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION — $11,737 · Community ImprovementBREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE — $8,500 · HealthNEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION — $6,500 · EnvironmentMANFORWARD — $5,500 · Crime & LegalNORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT — $5,500 · Youth Development
Human Services$77,888Other$66,862Public Benefit$12,000Community Improvement$11,737Health$8,500Environment$6,500Crime & Legal$5,500Youth Development$5,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER — $15,638 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBARRIOS UNIDOS — $12,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION — $11,737 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO — $10,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSISTERSONG INC — $10,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBREATH OF MY HEART BIRTH PLACE — $8,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION — $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHmong American Womens Association Inc — $5,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetESPERANZA UNITED — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIVE AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL PARENT RESOURCES INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFREEDOM INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT — $5,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community FoundationNM19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Novo Foundation · Borealis Philanthropy · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Tewa Women United funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Tewa Women United?

    Find your warmest path to Tewa Women United through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph