Loading…
· Public charity
TEWA WOMEN UNITED
Promote prevention, doula services, address gender violence, and environmental protection and awareness.
$67k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants
1
Communities
$67k
Largest
01What you fund
0160% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2023.
Human Services$68kPublic Benefit$12kCommunity Improvement$12kHealth$9kEnvironment$7kYouth Development$6kCrime & Legal$6kOther$77k
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
further
2022
healthyactionyouthleadershipdirectorganizinghealing
2023
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2023 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$66,862
Median grant
1
States reached
$10.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
- VARIOUS$66,862
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
New Mexico Child Advocacy Networks
Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.
—
2
Fuerza Y Union Multiple
Our mission is to build stronger, healthier communities, rich in values and culture. We offer a safe space to access services with mutual and equal respect, working with and for the Latinx community.
Community Improvement
3
New Mexico Voices for Children
To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexico's children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…
Civil Rights
4
Indigenous Women Rising
—
5
Bold Futures Nm
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
Human Services
6
Mujer Fuerza Y Coraje Inc
supporting vulnerable immigrant women through education, resources and advocacy
Human Services
7
Los Angeles Indigenous Peoples' Alliance
Los Angeles Indigenous Peoples Alliance (LAIPA) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit grassroots organization founded in 1991 as collective of indigenous people and persons of conscience. Our mission is to promote the continued development of…
Arts & Culture
8
El Centro De Igualdad Y Derechos
El centro de igualdad y derechos is a grass roots, latino immigrant led organization based in central new mexico that works with latino immigrant communities and allies to defend, strengthen, and advance the rights of our community. we…
Human Services
9
Public Health Acupuncture of New Mexico
The mission of Public Health Acupuncture of New Mexico is to promote the use of acupuncture to improve the health of people, to reduce health disparities, and to develop a public health acupuncture practitioner workforce for New Mexico. We…
—
10
El Centro Poder Y Accion
El centro poder y accion is an albuquerque-based civil rights and workers' justice organization that advocates for just working conditions and policies that ensure all new mexicans' have the opportunity to thrive. we focus on growing the…
Civil Rights
11
Latinos in Virginia Empowerment
Provide education, advocacy, and support to spanish speaking individuals affected by violence and injustice in virginia to ensure that they can access services to empower them to become happy, healthy, and self- sufficient.
Crime & Legal
12
Disability Rights New Mexico
To protect, promote, and expand the legal and civil rights of persons with disabilities.
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Youth Visions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$77,112Human Services$67,638Public Benefit$12,000Community Improvement$11,737Health$8,500Environment$6,500Youth Development$5,500Crime & Legal$5,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YOUTH IN POWER ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXIO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds BARRIOS UNDIOS ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NM ↗
- Who funds BREATH OF MY HEART BIRTHPLACE ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO ACEQUIA ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HMONG AMERICAN WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ESPERANZA UNITED ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS SERVICE COMMITTE ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN YOUTH PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MANFORWARD ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune · Borealis Philanthropy · NEO Philanthropy Inc · New Venture Fund · Tides Foundation · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation TEWA WOMEN UNITED funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BARRIOS UNDIOS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
high risk
~0 months of operating runway; revenue held over 3 filed years.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
3 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 810867528 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BARRIOS UNDIOS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- FlagFinancial stability— Roughly 0 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue held over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Tewa Women United?
Find your warmest path to Tewa Women United through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines