Skip to content

· Private foundation

Teb Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$185k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$500kHuman Services$237kReligion$231kCrime & Legal$84kEducation$76kHousing & Shelter$68kArts & Culture$50kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $135k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB$50,000
CHAMBERLAIN BALLET$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
TRAFFICK911$15,000
BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE FOUNDATION$15,000
BRIDGES TO LIFE$10,000
PATHS TO INDEPENDENCE$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $112k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $13k → 15%DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY: $5k → 8%PATHWAYS ADULT LEARNING CENTER: $14k → 15%OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY: $12k → 15%OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY: $12k → 15%OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY: $10k → 15%BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC: $10k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $3k → 14%COMMUNITY PARTNERS OF DALLAS: $3k → 14%THE MEN OF NEHEMIAH: $17k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Teb Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 23% of the giving stays in OK; by stated purpose, 16%.

Teb Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.7% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$908k · 18 repeat orgs$400k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
21

Total granted

$908k
$265k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+40%

Still filing today

83%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $158k · revenue +69%
  • PA
    Pathways Adult Learning Center Inc
    4× · 2018–2022 · $71k · revenue ×14
  • D2
    DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $70k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • AP
    Asha Partners
    one grant, 2018 · $33k · revenue +9%
  • KA
    KING'S ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $30k · revenue +40%
  • OC
    One CommunityUSA
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -59%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
UnBound North Texas

Unbound North Texas exists to support survivors and resource the community to fight human trafficking through Survivor Advocacy, a 24/7 Drop-In Center, and Prevention and Awareness.

—
2
Elevate North Texas

Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…

Health
3
The Center for Integrative Counseling and Psychology

Our mission is to provide accessible high-quality counseling, training, psychological evaluations, and educational testing that equip our clients to grow through lifes changes and challenges.

Health
4
Homeward Bound Inc

To promote positive behavioral health and independence for individuals and families suffering from drug abuse, addiction, criminal behavior, and mental illness.

Crime & Legal
5
Texas Reach Out Inc

Provides housing and spiritual development for Christians reintegrating into society upon exiting the criminal justice system.

Health
6
Hope's Door New Beginning Center

The mission of hope's door new beginning center is to offer intervention and prevention services to individuals and families affected by intimate partner and family violence and to provide education programs that enhance the community's…

Human Services
7
His Story Coaching and Counseling

Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.

Human Services
8
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
9
Welcome House Inc

The Welcome House is a non-profit, sober living, recovery program (incorporated in 1971) with the sole purpose of educating and rehabilitating the adult male alcoholic/ addict and the expressed mission of returning the individual to…

Health
10
A Bridge to Opportunity Inc

To operate a 30 unit permanent and temporary housing facility known as Destiny Village for rental to low income individuals and families who are survivors of domestic violence and or sexual assault

Housing & Shelter
11
Fort Worth Teen Challenge Inc

Provide rehabilitation services and guidance to follow Christian principles to restore teens and young adults sufferning from addictions and trauma and ultimately placing them back into society as positive contributors

—
12
Oasis Counseling International

To provide to the general public the following services: 1) Individual Psychological Counseling, 2) Play therapy for children, 3)Marriage Counseling, 4) Psychological Evaluations, 5)Financial Counseling, 6)Career Counseling, 7)psychiatric,…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Recovery Resource Council; the most unlike its peers is Trinity River Mission Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
26/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $157,500 · OtherLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INCTHE SUICIDE AND CRISIS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS: $109,500 · OtherTHE SUICIDE AND CRISIS CENTER OF NORTH TEXASDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $70,000 · OtherDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INCTHE MAGDALEN HOUSE: $60,000 · OtherTHE MAGDALEN HOUSERecovery Resource Council: $40,000 · OtherPEDIPLACE INC: $30,000 · OtherCHAMBERLAIN BALLET: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · Other+17 more: $231,500 · Other+17 moreUNCHARTED MINISTRIES: $178,000 · ReligionUNCHARTED MINISTRIE…Asha Partners: $33,000 · ReligionAsha PartnersWELL COMMUNITY: $10,000 · ReligionPathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $70,825 · Human ServicesPathways Adult…OPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC: $34,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION HOPE…MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $16,500 · Human ServicesMEN OF NEHEMIA…HOPE SUPPLY CO: $15,000 · Human ServicesHOPE SUPPLY COTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HO…BEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesBEHIND EVERY D…+2 more: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more29 ACRES INC: $40,000 · HealthAGAPE CLINIC: $10,000 · HealthMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREATER DALLAS: $5,000 · HealthKING'S ACADEMY: $30,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationPATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $10,000 · EducationGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · EducationOne CommunityUSA: $25,000 · Community ImprovementTraffick911: $15,000 · Crime & LegalBRIDGES TO LIFE: $10,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$758,500Religion$221,000Human Services$168,825Health$55,000Education$55,000Community Improvement$25,000Crime & Legal$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNCHARTED MINISTRIES: $178,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $157,500 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetTHE SUICIDE AND CRISIS CENTER OF NORTH TEXAS: $109,500 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetPathways Adult Learning Center Inc: $70,825 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $70,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetTHE MAGDALEN HOUSE: $60,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetRecovery Resource Council: $40,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget29 ACRES INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOPERATION HOPE PRISON MINISTRY INC: $34,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetAsha Partners: $33,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetKING'S ACADEMY: $30,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetPEDIPLACE INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCHAMBERLAIN BALLET: $30,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetOne CommunityUSA: $25,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetTRINITY RIVER MISSION INC: $23,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $16,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTraffick911: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY GATEWAY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGAPE CLINIC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHS TO INDEPENDENCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWELL COMMUNITY: $10,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPROJECT TRANSFORMATION NORTH TEXAS: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetDALLAS LIFE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGES TO LIFE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBEHIND EVERY DOOR MINISTRIES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOME POINT: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYouth With Faces: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE WARREN CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF GREATER DALLAS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES COMMUNITY PARTNERS INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGRANT HALLIBURTON FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN INN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCenter for Survivors of Torture: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX46.7× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · The Rees-Jones Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Hattie Mae Lesley Foundation Inc · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Episcopal Health Foundation Of Dallas

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Teb Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Teb Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Teb Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Teb Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Teb’s filings →

    More from the funding graph