· Private foundation
Tatar Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k43 grants · $111k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $100k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $25,000 |
| FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $15,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY | $10,000 |
| FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES | $7,000 |
| FOOD FOR THOUGHT OUTREACH INC | $6,000 |
| FOS FEMINISTA | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC | $5,000 |
| PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASU | $5,000 |
| UWM FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $148k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
50 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $43k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
The Florida State University Foundation Inc8× · 2018–2025 · $161k · revenue +96%- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches9× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +46%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC8× · 2017–2025 · $119k · revenue +12%
Funded once
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INCone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +18%- UWUNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST FLORIDA INCone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -10%
POPULATION CONNECTIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +97%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Philanthropy colorado is a nonprofit membership association for grantmakers throughout the state. its mission is strengthen colorado communities by bringing people, information and resources together.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
The vision of the csfc is to partner with the fire service and supplier partners across the state of colorado in their efforts to protect all of colorado's life and property from fire and other disasters. it is a dynamic organization,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rocky Mountain Planned Parenthood Inc and the most unlike its peers is Colorado Veterans of Foreign Wars Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
66 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 66 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Florida State University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds THE UWM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SLC6A1 CONNECT ↗
- Who funds Colorado Veterans of Foreign Wars Foundation ↗
- Who funds FOOD FOR THOUGHT OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTH FLORIDA AND THE TREASURE COAST INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds CARING & SHARING OF SOUTH WALTON INC ↗
- Who funds GULFARIUM CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DESTIN CHARITY WINE AUCTION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA STATE PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ROUNDUP RIVER RANCH ↗
- Who funds Feeding the Gulf Coast ↗
- Who funds ALAQUA ANIMAL REFUGE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST FLORIDA STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Steamboat Adaptive Recreational Sports ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHWEST AND CENTRAL FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL FRIENDS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds INTEGRATED COMMUNITY ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF COLORADO AVALANCHE INFORMATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S BEAN PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Colorado Animal Rescue Express (CARE) ↗
- Who funds Save Our Cats and Kittens ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR AVALANCHE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS ↗
- Who funds BOOK TRAILS INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds Routt County Humane Society ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WATERFRONT RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Steve and Kelly Bloom Family Foundation · Fireside Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · United Way of the Yampa Valley · The Moniker Foundation · Gulf Power Foundationinc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tatar Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Planned Parenthood of South Florida and the Treasure Coast Inc — 6% of income from government
- United Way of Northwest Florida Inc — 2% of income from government
- Feed the Children Inc — 1% of income from government
- Northwest Florida State College Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.