How much did UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY grant in FY2024?

UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY reported 33 grants totaling $583,161 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY based?

UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY is based in CO.

UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community and uniting our partners to succeed in four key impact areas of early childhood education, youth success, financial stability and health and crisis services.

$583k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$43k

Largest

01What you fund

0177% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$854kHealth$439kEducation$214kCommunity Improvement$114kPhilanthropy$92kRecreation & Sports$80kYouth Development$20kPublic Benefit$14kCrime & Legal$6kOther$533k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

childrengoalworkingparentspositive

2020

cultivation

2021

childrengoalworkingparentspositivetuition

2022

tuitioncultivation

2023

preschool tuitionchildrengoalworkingparentspositive

2024

childcare tuitionpreschool tuitionchildrengoalworkingparentschild

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k7 grants · $50k
$10k–50k26 grants · $502k

$14,000

Median grant

States reached

$1.8M

Total assets

Largest grants

NW COLORADO HEALTH$42,500
ADVOCATES BUILDING PEACEFUL C$39,250
PARTNERS FOR YOUTH$36,750
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NW CO$34,500
FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$32,000
HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$25,000
TOTALLY KIDS INC$24,500
COMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER$22,355
MIND SPRING HEALTH$21,000
YOUNG TRACKS$18,000
INTEGRATED COMMUNITY$17,500
HORIZONS$17,500
SOROCO PRESCHOOL$16,000
HAYDEN VALLEY PRESCHOOL$15,000
ROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$15,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $268k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.2M · 23 repeat orgs$169k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.2M

$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%

+45%

Still filing today

74%

20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

FD
FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER
7× · 2018–2024 · $222k · revenue +32%
SP
SOROCO PRESCHOOL
7× · 2018–2024 · $201k · revenue +4%
NC
NW COLORADO HEALTH
7× · 2018–2024 · $165k · revenue +201%

Funded once

SM
STEAMBOAT MONTESSORI
one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue +42%
GF
GRAND FUTURES PREVENTION COAL
one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +45%
DP
DOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBR
one grant, 2023 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Regional Home Visitation Program

Enhancing family strengths for happy and healthy children, families, and communities.

Human Services

Rural Communities Resource Center

The Rural Communities Resource Center RCRC is a grassroots non-profit organization in Northeast Colorado. The RCRC provides advocacy, support and education to create systems change and develop programs that promote the physical, emotional…

Human Services

Early Childhood Collective of Douglas County Inc

Early Childhood Collective connects the coalition of early childhood resources that serves growing families in Douglas County.

Education

Southwest Colorado Mental Health Center

Axis health system (ahs) is the designated community mental health center, and a licensed substance use provider and a hrsa community health centers (fqhc) providing integrated primary care including oral health care. ahs offers a wide…

Health

Nursing and Therapy Services of Colorado

Empowering every age at every stage.

Health

Colorado West Healthcare System

Improve the health and quality of life of the individuals and communities we serve.

Health

Community School Collaborative

Community School Collaborative empowers Park County youth through innovative career exploration experiences to achieve a fulfilling and meaningful education, career and life.

Education

Yampatika

Yampatika's mission is to inspire environmental stewardship through education. They fulfil that mission by developing environmental learning opportunities that serve the children and adults of Northwest Colorado.

Environment

Mountain Tots Preschool

Our preschool provides high quality early learning enrichment programs that enhances educational, social, emotional, physical, and cognitive development as well as Kindergarten-readiness. We provide preschool and childcare services 5 days…

Education

Early Childhood Education Association of Colorado

To assist, develop, encourage and promote activities which further the business of providing quality child care services.

—

Routt County Riders

Routt County Riders advocates to implement positive change for cyclists in Northwest Colorado.

Education

Ymca of the Rockies

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Colorado Visiting Nurse Association and the most unlike its peers is Young Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/37

the rest of the field

14%

26/185

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

27/32

Grantees still filing

29/32

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$854,196Other$572,193Health$438,750Education$214,134Community Improvement$113,595Philanthropy$92,250Recreation & Sports$80,140

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Yampa Valley Medical Center FoundationCO42.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Moffat County United Way · The Colorado Trust · Anschutz Family Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Rotary International Steamboat Springs · Steamboat Springs Education Fund · The Colorado Health Foundation · Groupgives Yampa Valley Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: SOUTH ROUTT RECREATION ASSOCI.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 742685726 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on SOUTH ROUTT RECREATION ASSOCI, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue contracted over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 24% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to United Way of the Yampa Valley?

Find your warmest path to United Way of the Yampa Valley through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United Way of the Yampa Valley?

More from the funding graph

UNITED WAY OF THE YAMPA VALLEY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

32 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to United Way of the Yampa Valley?

More from the funding graph