Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

United Way of the Yampa Valley

To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of our community and uniting our partners to succeed in four key impact areas of early childhood education, youth success, financial stability and health and crisis services.

$583k
Granted FY2024still arriving
33
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$43k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$895kHealth$621kHuman Services$454kYouth Development$387kCommunity Improvement$131kFood & Nutrition$89kHousing & Shelter$22kPublic Benefit$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 33 grants below total $551,411 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $583,161 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $31,750 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $502k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NW COLORADO HEALTH$42,500
ADVOCATES BUILDING PEACEFUL C$39,250
PARTNERS FOR YOUTH$36,750
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NW CO$34,500
FAMILY DEVELOPMENT CENTER$32,000
HEALTH PARTNERSHIP$25,000
TOTALLY KIDS INC$24,500
COMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER$22,355
MIND SPRING HEALTH$21,000
YOUNG TRACKS$18,000
HORIZONS$17,500
INTEGRATED COMMUNITY$17,500
SOROCO PRESCHOOL$16,000
ROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$15,000
HAYDEN VALLEY PRESCHOOL$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $307k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HUMAN RESOURCE CENTER: $8k → 10%CRAIG CITIZENS ACTION GROUP: $7k → 10%YOUNG TRACKS: $26k → 6%YOUNG TRACKS: $20k → 6%YOUNG TRACKS: $20k → 6%YOUNG TRACKS: $19k → 6%YOUNG TRACKS: $18k → 6%YOUNG TRACKS: $18k → 6%YOUNG TRACKS: $18k → 6%YOUNG TRACKS: $16k → 6%TOTALLY KIDS INC: $27k → 6%TOTALLY KIDS INC: $25k → 6%TOTALLY KIDS INC: $22k → 6%TOTALLY KIDS INC: $15k → 6%TOTALLY KIDS INC: $15k → 6%TOTALLY KIDS INC: $14k → 6%TOTALLY KIDS INC: $12k → 6%TOTALLY KIDS INC: $10k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.4M · 23 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
4

Total granted

$2.4M
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
0%

Still filing today

74%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $122k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    STEAMBOAT SPRINGS DISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER
    8× · 2017–2024 · $248k · revenue +45%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $191k · revenue +201%
  • PI
    PARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +171%

Funded once

  • WR
    WEST ROUTT RURAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $14k · revenue 0%
  • GF
    GRAND FUTURES PREVENTION COALITION
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue 0%
  • DP
    DOLLY PARTON IMAGINATION LIBR
    one grant, 2023 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Routt County Economic Development Partnership

The purpose(s) of the Partnership is to improve the quality of life and economic well-being across Routt County by: (i) enabling business and job retention to increase employment and improve the public welfare, (ii) promoting and assisting…

Community Improvement
2
Arapahoe County Early Childhood Council Inc

Services provided in arapahoe county colorado related to early childhood education intervention issues.

Education
3
Colorado Springs Child Nursery Centers Inc

THE COLORADO SPRINGS CHILD NURSERY CENTERS, INC. DBA EARLY CONNECTIONS LEARNING CENTERS (THE CENTER)OFFERS A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM OF SOCIAL, EMOTIONAL AND cognitive development for children in the Pikes Peak Region. This includes…

Human Services
4
Summit County Child Care Resource & Referral Agency

To improve quality, availability and affordability of early childhood education in Summit County, Colorado.

Human Services
5
Yampatika

Yampatika's mission is to inspire environmental stewardship through education. They fulfil that mission by developing environmental learning opportunities that serve the children and adults of Northwest Colorado.

Environment
6
Routt County Riders

Routt County Riders advocates to implement positive change for cyclists in Northwest Colorado.

Education
7
Community School Collaborative

To provide innovative career exploration and work-based learning opportunities that prepare youth to enter tomorrow's workforce and build fulfilling lives.

Education
8
Boulder County Rsvp Board Inc dba Cultivate

Recruit staff and volunteer services to and for senior populations.

9
High Rockies Community School

Our mission is to provide individualized educational options where students and teachers engage in playful, exploratory learning by creating a culture of collaboration in a safe, diverse, multi-age environment. Our students are encouraged…

Education
10
Early Childhood Collective of Douglas County Inc

Early Childhood Collective connects the coalition of early childhood resources that serves growing families in Douglas County. ECCo serves as the fiscal agent and administrative hub for community-based early childhood programs that provide…

Education
11
Early Childhood Network

Enhance capacity, quality and accessibility of childcare

Human Services
12
North Range Behavioral Health

North range behavioral health is dedicated to providing professional, comprehensive mental health and substance use disorder services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Colorado Visiting Nurse Association and the most unlike its peers is Totally Kids Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyElementary Literacy TutoringHealth Access Advocacy and …Senior Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsChristian Missionary Organi…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number26%0%<5yr16%5%5–10yr22%29%10–20yr20%29%20–35yr6%33%35–55yr13%5%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value26%0%<5yr16%2%5–10yr22%27%10–20yr20%30%20–35yr6%29%35–55yr13%12%55yr+

The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/37
the rest of the field
16%
30/185

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/33
Grantees still filing
24/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

STEAMBOAT SPRINGS DISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER — $248,412 · Human ServicesSTEAMBOAT SPRINGS DISCOVERY LEARNING CENT…YOUNG TRACKS INC — $154,519 · Human ServicesYOUNG TRACKS INCBETTER TOMORROW — $152,177 · Human ServicesBETTER TOMORROWTOTALLY KIDS INC — $138,443 · Human ServicesTOTALLY KIDS INCROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $89,235 · Human ServicesROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INCLift Up of Routt County — $75,494 · Human ServicesLift Up of Routt CountyYampa Valley Autism Program — $57,500 · Human ServicesYampa Valley Autism Program+4 more — $43,500 · Human ServicesCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC — $227,164 · HealthCOLORADO WEST REGIONA…NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $191,205 · HealthNORTHWEST COLORADO VI…Northwest Colorado Community Health Partnership Inc — $48,000 · HealthNorthwest Colorado Co…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $26,402 · Health+1 more — $7,000 · HealthBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NW CO — $117,549 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF…Hayden School District No RE-1 — $94,435 · OtherHayden School District…REACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC — $72,853 · OtherREACHING EVERYONE PREV…NORTH ROUTT PRESCHOOL — $71,958 · OtherNORTH ROUTT PRESCHOOLSteamboat Springs School District RE-2 — $43,000 · OtherSteamboat Springs Scho…COMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER — $22,355 · OtherHOLY NAME CATHOLIC PARISH IN STEAMBOAT SPRINGS — $17,957 · Other+8 more — $81,383 · Other+8 morePARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY — $155,317 · EducationPARTNERS IN RO…HERITAGE PARK PRESCHOOL — $107,313 · EducationHERITAGE PARK …NORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL — $33,144 · EducationNORTH ROUTT CO…STEAMBOAT READING INC — $31,000 · EducationSTEAMBOAT READ…+1 more — $7,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $130,547 · Community ImprovementYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $102,229 · PhilanthropySOROCO BASEBALL SOFTBALL — $93,325 · Recreation & Sports
Human Services$959,280Health$499,771Other$521,490Education$333,774Community Improvement$130,547Philanthropy$102,229Recreation & Sports$93,325

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEAMBOAT SPRINGS DISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER — $248,412 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC — $227,164 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $191,205 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY — $155,317 over 8y, 4.7% of budgetYOUNG TRACKS INC — $154,519 over 8y, 2.3% of budgetBETTER TOMORROW — $152,177 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetTOTALLY KIDS INC — $138,443 over 8y, 7.6% of budgetTHE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $130,547 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHERITAGE PARK PRESCHOOL — $107,313 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $102,229 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetSOROCO BASEBALL SOFTBALL — $93,325 over 7y, 24% of budgetROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $89,235 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetLift Up of Routt County — $75,494 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetREACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC — $72,853 over 8y, 6.8% of budgetNORTH ROUTT PRESCHOOL — $71,958 over 7y, 3.3% of budgetYampa Valley Autism Program — $57,500 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetNorthwest Colorado Community Health Partnership Inc — $48,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL — $33,144 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSTEAMBOAT READING INC — $31,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $26,402 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER — $22,355 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetHORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES — $17,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONNECTIONS 4 KIDS — $14,170 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetWEST ROUTT RURAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC — $13,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLove Inc Of The Yampa Valley — $11,500 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetGRAND FUTURES PREVENTION COALITION — $10,000 over 1y, 8.2% of budgetHUMAN RESOURCE CENTER INC — $7,500 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetSenior Citizens Action Group — $7,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CRAIG FOUNDATION INC — $7,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetBOOK TRAILS INC — $7,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNORTHWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN CASA — $5,712 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $5,530 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STEAMBOAT SPRINGS DISCOVERY LEARNING CENTER
  • Who funds COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY
  • Who funds YOUNG TRACKS INC
  • Who funds BETTER TOMORROW
  • Who funds TOTALLY KIDS INC
  • Who funds THE COLORADO NONPROFIT DEVELOPMENT CENTER
  • Who funds HERITAGE PARK PRESCHOOL
  • Who funds YAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SOROCO BASEBALL SOFTBALL
  • Who funds ROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC
  • Who funds Lift Up of Routt County
  • Who funds REACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC
  • Who funds NORTH ROUTT PRESCHOOL
  • Who funds Yampa Valley Autism Program
  • Who funds Northwest Colorado Community Health Partnership Inc
  • Who funds NORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL
  • Who funds STEAMBOAT READING INC
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER
  • Who funds HORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS 4 KIDS
  • Who funds SOUTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CORPORATION
  • Who funds WEST ROUTT RURAL HEALTH COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Love Inc Of The Yampa Valley
  • Who funds GRAND FUTURES PREVENTION COALITION
  • Who funds HUMAN RESOURCE CENTER INC
  • Who funds Senior Citizens Action Group
  • Who funds THE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF CRAIG FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BOOK TRAILS INC
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ROCKY MOUNTAIN CASA
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Craig-Scheckman Family FoundationCO47.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Moffat County United Way · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Mile High United Way Inc · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Moniker Foundation · Steamboat Springs Education Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization United Way of the Yampa Valley funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph