Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation

The mission of YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION is to support the healthcare services of uchealth yampa valley medical center and the communities it serves.

$1.7M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Health$5.5MRecreation & Sports$1.0MHuman Services$171kEducation$113kYouth Development$107kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kPhilanthropy$27kFood & Nutrition$12kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 4 grants below total $413,901 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,682,638 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,268,737 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $129k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$78,901
Median grant
1
States reached
$28M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTHWEST COLORADO HEALTH$250,000
YVMC$78,901
ROUTT COUNTY RIDERS$50,000
YAMPA VALLEY AUTISM PROGRAM$35,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $221k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ADVOCATES OF ROUTT COUNTY: $95k → 6%HORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES: $26k → 6%ADVOCATES OF ROUTT COUNTY: $20k → 6%BETTER TOMORROW: $20k → 6%BETTER TOMORROW: $15k → 6%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $10k → 6%BETTER TOMORROW: $10k → 6%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $10k → 6%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $9k → 6%LIFT UP ROUTT COUNTY: $6k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.8M · 19 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
12

Total granted

$6.8M
$171k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+22%

Still filing today

68%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YV
    YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3.4M · revenue +55%
  • SH
    STEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +127%
  • NC
    NORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $760k · revenue +152%

Funded once

  • CM
    COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -2%
  • TO
    TOWN OF OAK CREEK
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • CS
    COURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Routt County Economic Development Partnership

The purpose(s) of the Partnership is to improve the quality of life and economic well-being across Routt County by: (i) enabling business and job retention to increase employment and improve the public welfare, (ii) promoting and assisting…

Community Improvement
2
Colorado Thrives

Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.

Community Improvement
3
Colorado Mountain Bike Association

COMBA is dedicated to protecting and improving mountain biking on the Colorado Front Range.

Recreation & Sports
4
Community School Collaborative

To provide innovative career exploration and work-based learning opportunities that prepare youth to enter tomorrow's workforce and build fulfilling lives.

Education
5
Colorado Veterans Resource Coalition
Health
6
Colorado Press Association

Promote the general interest of daily, weekly, and monthly newspapers and online publications, improve editorials and business methods of daily and weekly newspapers, and advance those newspapers' usefulness and influence in the public…

—
7
Yampatika

Yampatika's mission is to inspire environmental stewardship through education. They fulfil that mission by developing environmental learning opportunities that serve the children and adults of Northwest Colorado.

Environment
8
Destination Colorado Meetings

a member based state association of over 100 companies targeting meeting planners & incentive buyers. members include bureaus, hotels, resorts, destination management companies, activity companies, & other meeting services. we are…

—
9
Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation

The mission of the Colorado Physician Health Program Corporation is to promote the health and well-being of physicians and physician assistants through evaluation, treatment referral, support education and research.

Health
10
Community Foundation Serving Southwest Colorado

To develop and increase charitable giving that connects donors to community needs in Southwest Colorado and to support the nonprofit sector through granting and educational opportunities.

Philanthropy
11
North Range Behavioral Health

North range behavioral health is dedicated to providing professional, comprehensive mental health and substance use disorder services.

Health
12
Colorado Chamber of Commerce Fka Co Assn of Commerce & Industry

The colorado chamber of commerce mission is to enhance the business climate of the state of colorado by promoting a positive legislative and regulatory environment and providing programs and services for its members, economic education,…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northwest Colorado Visiting Nurse Association and the most unlike its peers is Mountain Village Montessori Charter School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity College Foundatio…Independent K-12 SchoolsYouth Development CentersPregnancy Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Senior Support ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER — $3,397,308 · HealthYAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTERNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $760,000 · HealthNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION+3 more — $99,900 · HealthSTEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC — $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsSTEAMBOAT HEALTH…Steamboat Springs School District RE-2 — $470,000 · OtherSteamboat Sprin…South Routt School District RE-3 — $143,000 · OtherSouth Routt Sch…Hayden School District No RE-1 — $118,000 · OtherHayden School D…REACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC — $101,800 · OtherREACHING EVERYO…COLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · Other+7 more — $110,300 · Other+7 moreBETTER TOMORROW — $226,000 · Human ServicesHORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES — $101,300 · Human ServicesYampa Valley Autism Program — $85,000 · Human ServicesINTEGRATED COMMUNITY — $79,000 · Human ServicesLift Up of Routt County — $34,500 · Human Services+1 more — $12,000 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY — $65,400 · EducationROUTT COUNTY RIDERS — $50,000 · EducationNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL — $28,000 · EducationMOUNTAIN VILLAGE MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL — $10,000 · EducationNorthwest Colorado Center for Independence Inc — $8,000 · EducationYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $26,890 · PhilanthropyCOURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO — $14,000 · Youth DevelopmentCONNECTIONS 4 KIDS — $2,500 · Youth Development
Health$4,257,208Recreation & Sports$1,000,000Other$978,100Human Services$537,800Education$161,400Philanthropy$51,890Youth Development$16,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetYAMPA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER — $3,397,308 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSTEAMBOAT HEALTH & RECREATION ASSOC — $1,000,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetNORTHWEST COLORADO VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION — $760,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetBETTER TOMORROW — $226,000 over 5y, 9.0% of budgetREACHING EVERYONE PREVENTING SUICIDE INC — $101,800 over 5y, 10% of budgetHORIZONS SPECIALIZED SERVICES — $101,300 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYampa Valley Autism Program — $85,000 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetINTEGRATED COMMUNITY — $79,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN ROUTT COUNTY — $65,400 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC — $46,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $38,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO MOUNTAIN COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetLift Up of Routt County — $34,500 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH ROUTT COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL — $28,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetYAMPA VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $26,890 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOURT SPORTS FOR LIFE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGRAND FUTURES PREVENTION COALITION — $22,500 over 2y, 8.2% of budgetNorthwest Colorado Community Health Partnership Inc — $15,700 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY BUDGET CENTER — $15,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF NORTHWEST COLO — $14,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetROUTT COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC — $12,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMOUNTAIN VILLAGE MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNorthwest Colorado Center for Independence Inc — $8,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCONNECTIONS 4 KIDS — $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Craig-Scheckman Famil…United Way of the Yam…Colorado Gives Founda…Rocky Mountain Health…Anschutz Family Found…The Colorado Health F…Mile High United Way …Moffat County United …Steamboat Springs Edu…The Moniker FoundationThe Colorado TrustSteve and Kelly Bloom…
Craig-Scheckman Family FoundationCO45.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Craig-Scheckman Family Foundation · United Way of the Yampa Valley · Colorado Gives Foundation · Rocky Mountain Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Moffat County United Way · Steamboat Springs Education Fund · The Moniker Foundation · The Colorado Trust · Steve and Kelly Bloom Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Yampa Valley Medical Center Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home