Skip to content
Sutter Health Alliance (Fka Sutter Health Plan) at a glance

· Public charity

Sutter Health Alliance (Fka Sutter Health Plan)

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS.

$136k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$151kEducation$150kHealth$115kHousing & Shelter$36kFood & Nutrition$10k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$294M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MY SISTERS HOUSE$40,500
WOMENS EMPOWERMENT$35,500
VERITY COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT$20,000
RICHMOND AREA MULTI SVC INC$20,000
CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 40% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL-CONTRA COSTA CTY: $30k → 9%CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $20k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Pan-Ethnic Health Network

To promote health equity by advocating for public policies and sufficient resources to address the health needs of communities of color.

Health
2
Community Impact Central Valley

To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.

Health
3
Healthy Community Forum for Sacramento Region dba Community HealthWorks

Healthy Community Forum for the Greater Sacramento Region operates under the name Community HealthWorks (formally Sacramento Covered), a not-for-profit philanthropic organization, is an innovative leader in developing and implementing a…

Health
4
Asian Health Services

Asian Health Services (AHS) provides a continuum of medical care, mental health care, dental care and other healthcare services for all, including health education; perinatal services; behavioral health; family and youth services;…

Health
5
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
6
California Consortium for Urban Indian Health

The mission of ccuih is to facilitate shared development resources for our members and to raise public awareness in order to support a health and wellness network that meets the needs of american indians living in urban communities in…

—
7
Health Projects Center

Health Projects Center supports people as they age to live safely at home by delivering high quality services and programs in the Monterey Bay Region.

Crime & Legal
8
Consejo Counseling & Referral Service

Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.

Health
9
Asian Pacific Health Care Venture Inc

Asian Pacific Health Care Venture, Inc. is a family of community health centers whose mission is to be the medical home for our patients by providing personalized, quality health care services in a culturally accessible manner.

—
10
Central Valley Gender Health & Wellness
Civil Rights
11
Center for Community Solutions

The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…

Health
12
Cultiva La Salud

Cultiva La Salud is dedicated to creating health equity in the San Joaquin Valley by fostering changes in communities that support healthy eating and active living. Cultiva La Salud is among a growing number of programs in the nation who…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Human Services; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LINKED LEARNING ALLIANCE: $150,000 · EducationLINKED LEARNING ALLIANCEWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT: $35,500 · EducationWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENTNorthern California Center For Well-Being: $50,000 · HealthNorthern California Center F…American Heart Association Inc: $25,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Association I…Street Level Health Project: $20,000 · HealthStreet Level Health ProjectRICHMOND AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $20,000 · HealthRICHMOND AREA MULTI-SERVICES…DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE: $30,000 · Human ServicesDISTRICT COU…CENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $20,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR H…My Sisters House: $40,500 · Crime & LegalMy Sister…PUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR: $40,000 · Arts & CulturePUENTE DE…VERITY-COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION: $20,000 · OtherTHE HEAL PROJECT: $10,000 · Environment
Education$185,500Health$115,000Human Services$50,000Crime & Legal$40,500Arts & Culture$40,000Other$20,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLINKED LEARNING ALLIANCE: $150,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetNorthern California Center For Well-Being: $50,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMy Sisters House: $40,500 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPUENTE DE LA COSTA SUR: $40,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWOMEN'S EMPOWERMENT: $35,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetDISTRICT COUNCIL OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL DIOCESE: $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR HUMAN SERVICES: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetStreet Level Health Project: $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetVERITY-COMPASSION SAFETY SUPPORT A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetRICHMOND AREA MULTI-SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HEAL PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kaiser Foundation Hos…East Bay Community Fo…Sutter Bay HospitalsThe California Endowm…Public Health Institu…The San Francisco Fou…American Online Givin…Network for GoodNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCA27× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · East Bay Community Foundation · Sutter Bay Hospitals · The California Endowment · Public Health Institute · The San Francisco Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sutter Health Alliance (Fka Sutter Health Plan) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sutter Health Alliance (Fka Sutter Health Plan). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sutter Health Alliance (Fka Sutter Health Plan)’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home