Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sunrise Charitable Foundation Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$7.2MArts & Culture$4.7MSocial Science$2.0MHuman Services$710kPublic Benefit$545kInternational$460kYouth Development$110kPhilanthropy$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $885k
  • $250k+2 grants · $550k
$60,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$39M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SMITH COLLEGE$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE$250,000
BROOKINGS INSTITUTE$200,000
SPARK THE JOURNEY$200,000
WAMU$150,000
WETA$75,000
PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING$75,000
PRO PUBLICA$75,000
NEW FUTURES$60,000
YALE UNIVERSITY$50,000
FAIR OBSERVER$25,000
MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL$21,560
THE NATIONAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY$15,000
THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT$10,000
MAGNUM FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $710k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW FUTURES: $200k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $200k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $100k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $100k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $60k → 14%NEW FUTURES: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 31 repeat orgs$191k to everyone else

31 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
11

Total granted

$16M
$166k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+36%

Still filing today

65%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationPublic BenefitSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +31%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +163%
  • TB
    THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $1.9M · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IF
    INSTITUTE FOR CHRONIC TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TF
    THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +123%
  • The Rand Corporation
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +11%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research

The american enterprise institute is a community of scholars and supporters committed to expanding liberty, increasing individual opportunity, and strengthening free enterprise. aei pursues these ideals through independent thinking and the…

Social Science
5
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
6
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
7
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
8
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Institute for Experiential Learning Inc

The mission of the washington internship institute is to foster students' intellectual, personal, and professional development through individually tailored, quality internships and challenging academic coursework that take full advantage…

Education
12
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Teach for America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smile & Olive Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
24/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $1,977,500 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGEUNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE: $1,960,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLESPARK THE JOURNEY: $1,385,000 · EducationSPARK THE JOURNEY+5 more: $329,000 · Education+5 moreWAMU: $1,475,000 · OtherWAMUYALE UNIVERSITY: $1,163,003 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION - FREER GALLERY OF ART: $1,114,400 · OtherSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION - FREER GALLERY…NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO FOUNDATION: $910,000 · OtherNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO FOUNDATIONYALE UNIVERSITY: $217,000 · Other+18 more: $591,549 · Other+18 moreTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $1,950,000 · Social ScienceTHE BROOKINGS…PRO PUBLICA INC: $450,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLIC…GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $385,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER WA…BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYM…MAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $165,000 · Arts & CultureMAGNUM CUL…Fair Observer: $107,000 · Arts & CultureFair Obser…+4 more: $70,000 · Arts & CultureNEW FUTURES: $710,000 · Human ServicesPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING: $445,000 · Public BenefitThe Rand Corporation: $25,000 · Public BenefitSMILE & OLIVE FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Philanthropy
Education$5,651,500Other$5,470,952Social Science$1,950,000Arts & Culture$1,427,000Human Services$710,000Public Benefit$470,000Philanthropy$200,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE: $1,977,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE: $1,960,000 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetTHE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION: $1,950,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSPARK THE JOURNEY: $1,385,000 over 7y, 13% of budgetNEW FUTURES: $710,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC: $450,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING: $445,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC: $385,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $250,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE & OLIVE FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetNORWOOD SCHOOL INC: $175,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATION: $165,000 over 7y, 4.8% of budgetFair Observer: $107,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetLATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER: $102,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYouth Invest Partners Inc: $75,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetCOLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC: $70,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHE SEED FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMCE SOCIAL CAPITAL: $41,122 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEVINE MUSIC INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY CO EDWIN GROSVENOR: $15,000 over 1y, 9.3% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $14,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE LAB SCHOOL OF WASHINGTON: $9,760 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds SPARK THE JOURNEY ↗
  • Who funds NEW FUTURES ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING ↗
  • Who funds GREATER WASHINGTON EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE & OLIVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NORWOOD SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds MAGNUM CULTURAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Fair Observer ↗
  • Who funds LATIN AMERICAN YOUTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Youth Invest Partners Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIATE DIRECTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MCE SOCIAL CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds THE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNAROUND FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
  • Who funds The Rand Corporation ↗
  • Who funds LEVINE MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL HISTORICAL SOCIETY CO EDWIN GROSVENOR ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL BUILDING MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC27.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · The Rossotti Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Ford Foundation · Choksi Family Charitable Trust · Citybridge Foundation · Harman Family Foundation · Galena-Yorktown Foundation · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark-Winchcole Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sunrise Charitable Foundation Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sunrise Charitable Foundation Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • The Trustees of the Smith College: 1% of income from government
  • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Sunrise Charitable Foundation Trust?

Find your warmest path to Sunrise Charitable Foundation Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Sunrise’s filings →

More from the funding graph