· Private foundation
The Rossotti Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $490k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $76k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF DC | $75,569 |
| LADIES OF VIRTUE | $10,000 |
| DC AFFORDABLE LAW FIRM | $10,000 |
| LOVE UNITY AND VALUES INSTITUTE | $10,000 |
| LIFE SPAN | $10,000 |
| HERITAGE SIGNATURE CHORALE | $10,000 |
| HIGH JUMP | $10,000 |
| AMICA CENTER DC | $10,000 |
| PEOPLES MUSIC SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| CITY TUTOR DC | $10,000 |
| FARY COMER YOUTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| WASHINGTON CONCERT OPERA | $10,000 |
| ACLU | $10,000 |
| FLAP | $10,000 |
| THE GRAY MATTER EXPERIENCE | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +82% since the first grant, against +51% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 48 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $456k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALEGAL AID SOCIETY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA5× · 2017–2025 · $190k · revenue +69%
- WCWASHINGTON CONCERT OPERA3× · 2017–2025 · $120k · revenue +82%
- TCTHE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2025 · $60k · revenue +259%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $70k
- EJEQUAL JUSTICE WORKSone grant, 2024 · $70k · revenue 0%
- TPTAX POLICY CENTERone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The chicago high school for the arts (chiarts) develops the next generation of diverse, artistically promising scholar-artists through intensive pre-professional training in the arts, combined with a comprehensive college preparatory…
Chicago opera theater expands the tradition of opera as a living art form by engaging lovers of music and storytelling through innovative experiences, predominantly of new and rarely performed works.
The washington conservatory of music provides exceptional musical learning & listening experiences for students and the community. its vision is a community inspired and informed by the experience of music.
Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…
Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…
Center city public charter schools (center city pcs) empowers our students for lifelong success by building strong character, promoting academic excellence, and generating public service throughout washington, d.c.
Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…
The District of Columbia Arts Center serves the Washington DC area by presenting high caliber and challenging works. It encourages professionalism among artists by providing a forum for educational and cultural exchange. DCAC was founded…
Wla combines best practices in teaching and learning, with the latest in educational technology to create an unparalleled high school experience. students will graduate from wla prepared for college, career, and lives of public leadership.
Chicago Sinfonietta is a professional orchestra dedicated to modeling and promoting diversity, inclusion, and both racial and cultural equity in the arts through the universal language of symphonic music. Our core values are built around…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Soar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 92 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPARK THE JOURNEY ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID SOCIETY OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ↗
- Who funds CHORAL ARTS SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON CONCERT OPERA ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE WORKS ↗
- Who funds THE CHICAGO BAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ATLANTIC COUNCIL OF THE UNITED STATES INC ↗
- Who funds CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW FUTURES ↗
- Who funds LEVINE MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds ONE WORLD EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds MERIT AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LADIES OF VIRTUE ↗
- Who funds SITAR ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON DOUGLAS CHORALE ↗
- Who funds The Heritage Signature Chorale ↗
- Who funds HIGH JUMP ↗
- Who funds GARY COMER YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds MATH CIRCLES OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COMMUNITY CHORUS NFP ↗
- Who funds ASCEND JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'SCHORUSOFWASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds CITYSCHOOLS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds DC Affordable Law Firm ↗
- Who funds The Washington Chorus Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFE PIECES TO MASTERPIECES ↗
- Who funds SNOW CITY ARTS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Law Center for Better Housing ↗
- Who funds CORPORATION OF THE WASHINGTON LATIN SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · The Chicago Community Trust · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Clark Charitable Foundation Inc Dba a James & Alice B Clark Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Harman Family Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Hattie M Strong Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rossotti Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Chesapeake Bay Maritime Museum Inc — 17% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Bottom Line Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Rossotti Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Rossotti Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.