Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
48
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$550k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$2.3MEducation$1.8MHealth$901kPhilanthropy$677kReligion$227kFood & Nutrition$55kCivil Rights$50kSocial Science$50kOther$0
02FY2024 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k28 grants · $117k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $237k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $400k
  • $250k+2 grants · $960k
$5,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JEWISH MUSEUM$550,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$410,000
WNET$150,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$100,000
UJA FEDERATION$100,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$50,000
CONGREGATION EMANUEL OF WESTCHESTER$36,000
LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION$25,000
SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS$25,000
ANTI DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$25,000
WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$20,000
A GIVING HEART FOUNDATION$11,000
UNITED WAY$10,000
NEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO (WNYC)$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FUND FOR THE AGED: $10k → 17%BELEV ECHAD INC: $1k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
MO
VA
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 30 repeat orgs$455k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

30 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
17

Total granted

$6.0M
$294k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-17%

Still filing today

73%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $162k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
HealthEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Trustees of Tufts College
    4× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +50%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUM
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +99%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $610k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • N
    NET
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
6
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Jewish Community Organizati…Community Arts CentersCommunity FoundationsYouth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsFood Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Cancer Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%6%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%14%10–20yr19%25%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%9%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%69%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 4% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
4%2/53
the rest of the field
10%
11,857/120,707

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 71 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/48
Grantees still filing
25/48
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Trustees of Tufts College — $1,485,000 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $75,000 · EducationSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC — $75,000 · Education+7 more — $110,000 · Education+7 moreTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $1,300,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUMAmerican Museum of Natural History — $175,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural …THE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC — $65,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $47,500 · Arts & CultureWNET — $700,000 · OtherWNETCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER — $168,500 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WES…ALM — $150,800 · OtherALMNET — $100,000 · OtherNETUNITED WAY — $60,000 · Other+33 more — $441,996 · Other+33 moreCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $416,563 · HealthCANCER RESEARC…LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $275,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEA…AUTISM SPEAKS INC — $50,000 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS …A GIVING HEART FOUNDATION — $36,000 · HealthEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC — $32,500 · Health+4 more — $55,000 · Health+4 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $610,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEW…+3 more — $12,300 · PhilanthropyFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $50,000 · Food & NutritionANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $45,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Education$1,745,000Arts & Culture$1,587,500Other$1,621,296Health$865,063Philanthropy$622,300Food & Nutrition$50,000Civil Rights$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $1,485,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM — $1,300,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $610,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $416,563 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $275,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $175,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE — $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC — $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC — $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $55,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $45,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetA GIVING HEART FOUNDATION — $36,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC — $32,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetQUAKER RIDGE EMPLOYEE CHARITY FUND — $25,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetMETROPOLITAN GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE EMELIN THEATRE — $20,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCristian Rivera Foundation — $10,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDANIEL W OFFIT FUND TO FIGHT GLIOBLASTOMA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFUND FOR THE AGED INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bridge Golf Foundation — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROCK SCHOOL FOR DANCE EDUCATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $6,027 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld of Change — $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN SECTION PGA FOUNDATION INC — $2,940 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD TUCKER MUSIC FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RYE NATURE CENTER — $2,120 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARRISON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED — $1,300 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBELEV ECHAD INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHope For The Warriors — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE
  • Who funds SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds THE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
  • Who funds A GIVING HEART FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds QUAKER RIDGE EMPLOYEE CHARITY FUND
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE EMELIN THEATRE
  • Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC
  • Who funds Cristian Rivera Foundation
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds DANIEL W OFFIT FUND TO FIGHT GLIOBLASTOMA INC
  • Who funds FUND FOR THE AGED INC
  • Who funds AGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY24.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Glff Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Lake Road Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Fjc · The New York Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Connecticut College0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 71 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph