· Private foundation
Glff Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k31 grants · $84k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $221k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LARCHMONT TEMPLE | $535,000 |
| THIRD WAY INSTITUTE | $400,000 |
| NATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| AMERICA VOTES EDUCATION FUND | $200,000 |
| HOPEWELL FUND | $175,000 |
| OUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL | $150,000 |
| PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT | $100,000 |
| METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY | $75,000 |
| YMCA OF MARTHA'S VINEYARD | $51,000 |
| WILLIAM J BRENNAN JR CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC | $50,000 |
| JDC | $50,000 |
| VET VOICE FOUNDATION INC | $50,000 |
| THE PUBLIC THEATER | $27,710 |
| MVYOUTH | $26,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $750k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
122 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 78 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $380k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL7× · 2017–2024 · $882k · revenue +33%
- TWTHIRD WAY INSTITUTE4× · 2020–2024 · $850k · revenue +45%
- TVTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER4× · 2019–2023 · $725k · revenue +96%
Funded once
- WHWOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTIONone grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue 0%
EMPOWER SCHOOLS INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +53%- MSMERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Atlanta Hawks Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
179 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 179 of the 224 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL REDISTRICTING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds THIRD WAY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN NEW YORK COORDINATING COUNCIL ON JEWISH POVERTY ↗
- Who funds Hebrew Senior Life Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
- Who funds HOPEWELL FUND ↗
- Who funds VET VOICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VOTER REGISTRATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PROTECT DEMOCRACY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds WILLIAM J BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds MV YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds America Votes Education Fund ↗
- Who funds TIDES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds OUR AMERICAN FUTURE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds BROWN HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SHERIFF'S MEADOW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EMPOWER SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Israel Movement for Progressive Judaism ↗
- Who funds ENCOUNTER PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds PUSHBLACK ↗
- Who funds MERIT SPREAD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Met Council Inc ↗
- Who funds YMCA of Martha's Vineyard Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The New York Community Trust · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Lake Road Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Martha's Vineyard Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc · Nancy L Goodman & Richard Goodman Foundation · Peter & Rosanne Aresty Foundation · Martha's Vineyard Community Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Glff Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Marthas Vineyard Center for Living Inc — 40% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Boys & Girls Club Inc — 30% of income from government
- The Yard Inc — 28% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Preservation Trust Inc — 4% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Community Services Inc — 3% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Sheriff's Meadow Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Martha's Vineyard Film Society Inc — 2% of income from government
- Circuit Arts Inc — 1% of income from government
- Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
- Island Grown Initiative Ltd — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Glff Inc?
Find your warmest path to Glff Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.