Skip to content

· Private foundation

Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
53
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$350k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$2.3MEducation$1.8MHealth$901kPhilanthropy$677kReligion$227kFood & Nutrition$55kCivil Rights$50kSocial Science$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k29 grants · $110k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $233k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $503k
  • $250k+1 grant · $350k
$7,500
Median grant
12
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE JEWISH MUSEUM$350,000
WNET$150,000
TUFTS UNIVERSITY$102,500
UJA FEDERATION$100,000
CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE$50,000
HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL$50,000
HINDU TEMPLE OF TRI-STATE INC$50,000
CONGREGATION EMANUEL OF WESTCHESTER$37,000
AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY$25,000
STEPHEN WISE FREE SYNAGOGUE$16,394
Individual grant recipient$15,000
WHITE PLAINS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER$15,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FUND FOR THE AGED: $10k → 17%BELEV ECHAD INC: $1k → 17%HARLEM CHILDRENS ZONE: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
MO
VA
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.3M · 51 repeat orgs$347k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against -15% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 43 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
18

Total granted

$7.3M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
-15%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24’25
HealthArts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUM
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +99%
  • Trustees of Tufts College
    5× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +50%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $710k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • N
    NET
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

—
5
New York Cardiac Center Inc

The mission of the new york cardiac center is to be a part of the ongoing effort to diagnose and prevent heart and other diseases. we help to develop treatment for those who need it and assist in training new scientists, educators, and…

—
6
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
7
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
8
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Success Academy Charter Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
27/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE JEWISH MUSEUM: $1,650,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUMAmerican Museum of Natural History: $200,000 · Arts & CultureAmerican Museum of Natural Hi…THE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC: $70,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $72,500 · Arts & CultureWNET: $850,000 · OtherWNETCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WESTCHESTER: $205,500 · OtherCONGREGATION EMANU-EL OF WEST…ALM: $150,800 · OtherALMNET: $100,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · Other+37 more: $546,065 · Other+37 moreTrustees of Tufts College: $1,587,500 · EducationTrustees of Tufts CollegeSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $85,000 · EducationCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $85,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $70,000 · Education+6 more: $82,500 · EducationCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $466,563 · HealthCANCER RESEARC…LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $285,000 · HealthLYMPHOMA RESEA…AUTISM SPEAKS INC: $50,000 · HealthA GIVING HEART FOUNDATION: $46,000 · HealthWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $35,000 · HealthEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $32,500 · Health+4 more: $57,500 · Health+4 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $710,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEW…+4 more: $19,800 · PhilanthropyANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $55,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 · Civil RightsFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $50,000 · Food & Nutrition
Arts & Culture$1,992,500Other$2,022,365Education$1,910,000Health$972,563Philanthropy$729,800Civil Rights$60,000Food & Nutrition$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $1,650,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College: $1,587,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $710,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC: $466,563 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetLYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $285,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History: $200,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCONNECTICUT COLLEGE: $85,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC: $70,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $70,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA GIVING HEART FOUNDATION: $46,000 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetWhite Plains Hospital Medical Center: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $32,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetQUAKER RIDGE EMPLOYEE CHARITY FUND: $30,000 over 5y, 6.4% of budgetTHE EMELIN THEATRE: $25,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE JED FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Bridge Golf Foundation: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDANIEL W OFFIT FUND TO FIGHT GLIOBLASTOMA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMETROPOLITAN GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCristian Rivera Foundation: $15,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetAGAHOZO-SHALOM YOUTH VILLAGE INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTrustees of Dartmouth College: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSELFHELP COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE NATIONAL MENTORING PARTNERSHIP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ROCK SCHOOL FOR DANCE EDUCATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFIVER CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFUND FOR THE AGED INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPREP FOR PREP: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $7,567 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER TASK FORCE INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld of Change: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRICHARD TUCKER MUSIC FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN SECTION PGA FOUNDATION INC: $4,410 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHARRISON EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $2,800 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF RYE NATURE CENTER: $2,120 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER CAMP OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTE EDUCATION INC: $1,575 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds LYMPHOMA RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
  • Who funds SUCCESS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTICUT COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BATTERY CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC ↗
  • Who funds A GIVING HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds White Plains Hospital Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds QUAKER RIDGE EMPLOYEE CHARITY FUND ↗
  • Who funds THE EMELIN THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds THE JED FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Bridge Golf Foundation ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL W OFFIT FUND TO FIGHT GLIOBLASTOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN GOLF ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Cristian Rivera Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY GREATER NY & CT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY24.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Glff Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Lake Road Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Fjc · The New York Community Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Trustees of Tufts College: 13% of income from government
  • Connecticut College: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Stern Family Philanthropic Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Stern Family Philanthropic’s filings →

More from the funding graph