Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Star One Credit Union

A cooperative, organized for the purpose of promoting thrift and savings among its members, creating a source of credit for them at rates of interest set by the board of directors, and providing an opportunity for them to use and control their own money on a democratic basis in order to improve their economic and social conditions.

$963k
Granted FY2024still arriving
49
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$1.8MHuman Services$899kFood & Nutrition$834kHousing & Shelter$660kEducation$388kArts & Culture$90kAnimals$85kRecreation & Sports$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 49 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 49 grants below total $691,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $963,100 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $272,100 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $621k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$9.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK$50,000
CANCER CAREPOINT INC$35,000
LUCILLE PACKARD CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION$25,000
SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES$25,000
MARTHA'S KITCHEN$25,000
FAMILY GIVING TREE$25,000
THE ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$25,000
ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS$16,000
THE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY$15,000
NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL$15,000
HUNGER AT HOME$15,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC$15,000
LEAD SCHOLARS PROGRAM SCU$15,000
HEALTH TRUST MEALS ON WHEELS$15,000
SUNDAY FRIENDS FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $25k → 9%OPERATION CARE AND COMFORT: $12k → 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $25k → 9%OPERATION CARE AND COMFORT: $10k → 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $20k → 9%OPERATION CARE AND COMFORT: $10k → 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $20k → 9%OPERATION CARE AND COMFORT: $10k → 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $20k → 9%OPERATION CARE AND COMFORT: $10k → 10%OPEN DOORS TO FUTURE POSSIBILITIES: $11k → 8%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $15k → 9%OPERATION CARE AND COMFORT: $10k → 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $15k → 9%LIVE OAK ADULT DAY CARE: $10k → 8%AVENIDAS: $10k → 8%LIVE OAK ADULT DAY CARE: $10k → 8%AVENIDAS: $10k → 8%LIVE OAK ADULT DAY CARE: $10k → 8%SUNDAY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $20k → 8%SUNDAY FRIENDS FOUNDATION: $15k → 8%HUNGER AT HOME: $15k → 8%RAZING THE BAR: $10k → 8%HUNGER AT HOME: $10k → 8%HUNGER AT HOME: $10k → 8%SUNDAY FRIENDS: $10k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $20k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $10k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $10k → 8%FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING: $10k → 8%BILL WILSON CENTER: $10k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS INC: $15k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $25k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $25k → 8%MARTHA'S KITCHEN: $20k → 8%SAN ANDREAS REGIONAL CENTER: $15k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $30k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $27k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $25k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $20k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $25k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $16k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $15k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $15k → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $15k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
VA
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 10% of Star One Credit Union’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 79% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Star One Credit Unionlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.8M · 69 repeat orgs$135k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

69 repeat relationships — 48 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
12

Total granted

$4.8M
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+29%

Still filing today

99%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $622k · revenue +138%
  • SC
    SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $172k · revenue +128%
  • CC
    CANCER CAREPOINT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $170k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL CREDIT UNION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +22%
  • AS
    ABODE SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +25%
  • WV
    WEST VALLEY MISSION COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +53%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Housing Choices Coalition for Persons With Developmental Disabilities Inc

To enhance the lives of people with developmental and other disabilities by creating quality, affordable housing options.

Housing & Shelter
3
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
4
Family Caregiver Alliance

To support and assist caregivers of adults with chronic diseases and conditions through education, services, research and advocacy.

Health
5
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Institute On Aging

See schedule othe mission of the institute on aging is to enhance the quality of life for adults as they age by enabling them to maintain their health, well being, independence and participation in the community. ioa fulfills this mission…

Human Services
7
The San Francisco Particular Council of the Society of St Vincent De Paul

The mission of the st. vincent de paul society of san francisco (svdp-sf) is to offer hope and service on a direct person-to-person basis, working to break the cycles of homelessness and domestic violence.

Human Services
8
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

9
Destination Home Sv co Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Destination: home's mission is to make homelessness rare, brief, and non-recurring in santa clara county.

Housing & Shelter
10
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
11
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
12
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Health Trust and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%1%<5yr16%3%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%35%20–35yr12%33%35–55yr12%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%3%<5yr16%1%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr12%44%35–55yr12%17%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 1% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%1/83
the rest of the field
14%
11,424/80,777

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/82
Grantees still filing
60/82
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CANCER CAREPOINT INC — $170,000 · HealthCANCER CAREPOINT INCALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $159,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DIS…LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $142,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHI…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $125,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCTHE HEALTH TRUST — $115,000 · HealthTHE HEALTH TRUSTJACOBS HEART CHILDRENS CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES — $100,000 · HealthJACOBS HEART CHILDRENS CANCER SUP…CYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $77,500 · HealthNAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $77,500 · HealthCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $77,500 · HealthACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE — $70,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $62,500 · HealthVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) — $62,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $60,000 · Health+7 more — $173,000 · Health+7 moreSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $172,000 · Human ServicesSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERV…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $140,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANIONS FOR IN…Animal Assisted Happiness Inc — $121,000 · Human ServicesAnimal Assisted Happines…OPERATION CARE AND COMFORT — $77,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION CARE AND COMFO…FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $72,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSIN…MARTHA'S KITCHEN — $70,000 · Human ServicesMARTHA'S KITCHENSUNDAY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $53,000 · Human ServicesAVENIDAS — $50,500 · Human ServicesBILL WILSON CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesHUNGER AT HOME — $41,000 · Human ServicesSARATOGA AREA SENIOR COORDINATING COUNCIL — $37,500 · Human Services+8 more — $131,500 · Human Services+8 moreSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $622,000 · Food & NutritionSECOND HARVEST …Alameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank — $33,500 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $41,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 moreHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $150,000 · OtherHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SAN…THE FAMILY GIVING TREE — $132,500 · OtherTHE FAMILY GIVING TREEMORGAN AUTISM CENTER — $130,000 · OtherMORGAN AUTISM CENTERLIFEMOVES — $40,000 · OtherPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $40,000 · OtherWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $76,000 · OtherWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SER…SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $50,000 · OtherCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC — $65,000 · OtherCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICO…Happy Hollow Foundation — $60,000 · OtherHappy Hollow FoundationDowntown Streets Inc — $55,000 · Other+18 more — $324,000 · Other+18 morePRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $100,000 · EducationREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY — $75,000 · EducationTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY — $75,000 · EducationCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC — $75,000 · EducationSAN JOSE PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $15,000 · EducationNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL — $80,000 · PhilanthropyFOOTHILL-DEANZA COMMUNITY COLLEGES FOUNDATION — $27,500 · PhilanthropyMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION — $13,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TECH INTERACTIVE — $75,000 · Arts & CultureVETERANS MEMORIAL & SUPPORT FOUNDATION OF LOS GATOS — $20,000 · Arts & Culture
Health$1,471,500Human Services$1,065,500Food & Nutrition$696,500Other$1,122,500Education$370,000Philanthropy$120,500Arts & Culture$95,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $622,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $172,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCANCER CAREPOINT INC — $170,000 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $159,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $150,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH — $142,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $140,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY GIVING TREE — $132,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetMORGAN AUTISM CENTER — $130,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $125,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Assisted Happiness Inc — $121,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetTHE HEALTH TRUST — $115,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetJACOBS HEART CHILDRENS CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES — $100,000 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL — $80,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $77,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetNAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY — $77,500 over 8y, 1.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $77,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION CARE AND COMFORT — $77,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetWEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC — $76,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY — $75,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TECH INTERACTIVE — $75,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZEN SCHOOLS INC — $75,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC — $72,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMARTHA'S KITCHEN — $70,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE — $70,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetCHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC — $65,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $62,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) — $62,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHappy Hollow Foundation — $60,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetDowntown Streets Inc — $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSUNDAY FRIENDS FOUNDATION — $53,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetAVENIDAS — $50,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBILL WILSON CENTER — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGeorge Mark Childrens Fund — $45,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetJW HOUSE — $42,500 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetHUNGER AT HOME — $41,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPIVOTAL CONNECTIONS — $40,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSARATOGA AREA SENIOR COORDINATING COUNCIL — $37,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetHEALTHRIGHT 360 — $36,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN JOSE — $35,000 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetAlameda Emergency Food DBA Alameda Food Bank — $33,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN HOUSE — $33,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds CANCER CAREPOINT INC
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds HOMEFIRST SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC
  • Who funds THE FAMILY GIVING TREE
  • Who funds MORGAN AUTISM CENTER
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds Animal Assisted Happiness Inc
  • Who funds THE HEALTH TRUST
  • Who funds JACOBS HEART CHILDRENS CANCER SUPPORT SERVICES
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE
  • Who funds NEPHCURE KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE
  • Who funds NAMI SANTA CLARA COUNTY
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OPERATION CARE AND COMFORT
  • Who funds WEST VALLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds THE TECH INTERACTIVE
  • Who funds THE TOWER FOUNDATION OF SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds FAMILY SUPPORTIVE HOUSING INC
  • Who funds MARTHA'S KITCHEN
  • Who funds ACKNOWLEDGE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES OF SILICON VALLEY INC
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF)
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds Happy Hollow Foundation
  • Who funds Downtown Streets Inc
  • Who funds SUNDAY FRIENDS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AVENIDAS
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC
  • Who funds BILL WILSON CENTER
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW LOS ALTOS AND LOS ALTOS HILLS INC
  • Who funds George Mark Childrens Fund
  • Who funds JW HOUSE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund IncCA54.8× affinity24 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: San Jose Mercury News Wish Book Fund Inc · The Sobrato Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Second Harvest of Silicon Valley · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Destination Home SV co Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gordon E and Betty I Moore Foundation · Rotary Club of San Jose Foundation · The Health Trust · The Intuit Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Star One Credit Union funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Citizen Schools Inc8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
37report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Star One Credit Union?

Find your warmest path to Star One Credit Union through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph