· Public charity
Christus Health
Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 97 grants below total $4,304,329 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,481,679 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $177,350 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $20k
- $10k–50k54 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k40 grants · $2.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Catholic Charities of Dallas Inc | $150,000 |
| Congregation Of The Sisters Of Charity Of The Incarnate Word | $120,000 |
| St Vincent De Paul Pharmacy | $112,500 |
| Regional East Texas Food Bank | $110,000 |
| Catholic Charities Of Southeast Texas | $100,000 |
| Family And Youth Counseling Agency Inc | $100,000 |
| Central Louisiana Coalition To Prevent Homelessness Inc | $100,000 |
| Family Foundation Of Southwest La | $100,000 |
| Sabine Valley Regional Mhmr Center Dba Community Healthcore | $100,000 |
| Catholic Charities Of Southwest Louisiana In The Roman Catholic Diocese Of | $100,000 |
| Carevide | $100,000 |
| St Vincent De Paul | $90,000 |
| Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc | $80,000 |
| The Salvation Army | $75,000 |
| Runners Refuge Ministries | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $4.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 7% of Christus Health’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 65% of the giving stays in TX; read by stated purpose it is 62% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
130 repeat relationships — 72 still active in FY2025, 58 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $843k · revenue +429%
- CSChristus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation6× · 2017–2023 · $691k · revenue +87%
- CCCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas5× · 2017–2025 · $569k · revenue +166%
Funded once
- HIHOMEWISE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +170%
- BABISHOPS ANNUAL APPEAL CHARITABLE TRUSTone grant, 2017 · $250k
- GGencureone grant, 2018 · $250k · revenue -40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the roman catholic church.
Provide community-based primary healthcare with particular concern for the poor and needy. with a coordinated and holistic apporach in caring for body, mind, and spirit, offer affordable health care, social service, and health education…
The corporation's mission shall be to extend the healing ministry of jesus christ, and consistent therewith, shall operate according to the doctrines, resolutions, decrees and ethical principles of christus health, and the ethical and…
Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Our mission is to provide accessible, compassionate, culturally competent, and quality health care, affordable for all, regardless of ability to pay.
The mission of the Good Samaritan Center is to provide a safe, Christ- Centered environment that gives our patients quality, coordinated and affordable healthcare.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
Hsnt is committed to providing quality, affordable healthcare for the entire family from newborns to seniors, including prenatal care, women's health, behavioral health, a robust pediatric program, prescription assistance and infectious…
Our mission is to provide quality comprehensive free or low cost medical care for the uninsured, whatever their race or religion. The Clinic's services are available to any uninsured adult, 18 years old or older.
Community Healthcare of Texas provides compassionate palliative and hospice service to the terminally ill and their families throughout North Central Texas regardless of their ability to pay.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus St Michael Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Memory Care Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
240 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 240 of the 292 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HOMEWISE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Christus Santa Rosa Health Care Corporation ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas ↗
- Who funds Harvest Texarkana Regional Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL LOUISIANA COALITION TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL BEND CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY RENEWAL INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds Family and Youth Counseling Agency Inc ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds CLARITY CHILD GUIDANCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Community Health Service Agency Inc ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA IN THE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE ↗
- Who funds SHREVEPORT GREEN ↗
- Who funds REGIONAL EAST TEXAS FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH COMMUNITY SHELTER GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds Gencure ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATH - PEOPLE ATTEMPTING TO HELP ↗
- Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
- Who funds VILLA THERESE CATHOLIC CLINIC SISTERS OF CIINCINNATI ↗
- Who funds NORTHWEST LOUISIANA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds CHARLIES PLACE RECOVERY CENTER ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL CHARITABLE PHARMACY OF NORTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Christus Spohn Health System Corporation ↗
- Who funds Christus Spohn Health System DEVELOPMENT FND ↗
- Who funds WOMENS CENTER OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds THE HALO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WORLD NEIGHBORS INC ↗
- Who funds HAYS-CALDWELL WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds Family Foundation of Southwest Louisiana ↗
- Who funds ARK-TEX COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ↗
- Who funds University of the Incarnate Word ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CONFERENCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: St Luke's Lutheran Health Ministries Inc · San Antonio Area Foundation · Methodist Healthcare Ministries of South Texas Inc · The John G and Marie Stella Kenedy Memorial Foundation · St Vincent Hospital · Anchorum St Vincent · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Louisiana Foundation · Community Foundation of North Louisiana · United Way of San Antonio and Bexar County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christus Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- World Neighbors Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.