Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

St Joseph Health Northern California LLC

As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.

$9.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
35
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$33MHuman Services$5.6MHousing & Shelter$5.0MCivil Rights$770kEducation$428kCrime & Legal$313kCommunity Improvement$135kFood & Nutrition$105kOther$0
02FY2024 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $330k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+10 grants · $7.5M
$65,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$2,513,924
WEST COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY$1,045,000
CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT$750,000
BUCKELEW PROGRAMS$630,000
BURBANK HOUSING$600,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA$565,792
JAMBOREE HOUSING CORPORATION$500,000
REDWOOD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$378,182
ON THE MARGINS INC$270,000
TIDES CENTER$250,000
AMBULATORY SURGERY ACCESS COALITION$195,000
COPE FAMILY CENTER$167,000
SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH$162,176
LEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY$157,200
OLE HEALTH$109,530
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $40k → 9%THE LIVING ROOM CENTER INC: $400k → 9%MENTIS: $250k → 18%GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOCIATION: $15k → 9%TIDES CENTER: $250k → 9%HUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES: $95k → 9%ST JOSEPH HOME CARE NETWORK: $380k → 9%HUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES: $59k → 9%ON THE MOVE: $55k → 9%ON THE MOVE: $50k → 9%CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT: $750k → 9%UPVALLEY FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $30k → 9%MENTIS: $87k → 9%MENTIS: $35k → 9%SHARE THE CARE NAPA VALLEY: $25k → 9%MOLLYS ANGELS: $15k → 9%MOLLYS ANGELS: $12k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$38M · 27 repeat orgs$5.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

27 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
18

Total granted

$38M
$4.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
94%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • QO
    QUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2022–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +39% · 41% of their budget
  • BH
    BURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +105%
  • BP
    BUCKELEW PROGRAMS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • BH
    BURBANK HOUSINGSR CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $2.2M · revenue +587%
  • TL
    THE LIVING ROOM CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $400k · revenue -17%
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HOME CARE NETWORK
    one grant, 2022 · $380k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bonita House Inc

To empower people living with mental health and co-occurring substance use challenges to achieve recovery, self-sufficiency, and deeply connected, meaningful lives within their communities.we do this by: delivering culturally responsive…

—
2
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
3
Sonoma Applied Village Services

Address the homeless crisis in California.

Housing & Shelter
4
Community Housing Sonoma County

Community Housing Sonoma County creates supportive housing communities for people living with disabling conditions, especially veterans.

Housing & Shelter
5
Sutter Valley Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
6
Council on Aging Services for Seniors

To enhance the quality of life for our aging community by providing services that promote wellbeing and maintain independence.

—
7
Health Projects Center

Health Projects Center supports people as they age to live safely at home by delivering high quality services and programs in the Monterey Bay Region.

Crime & Legal
8
Westside Community Mental Health Center Westside Community Services Inc

The mission of Westside Community Services is to provide high quality, family-centered, culturally competent behavioral health and human services for the residents of the city and county of San Francisco.

Health
9
Open Door Community Health Centers

Open Door Community Health Centers promotes social justice and human dignity through exceptional patient-centered care that improves the health and well-being of our patients, community, and staff.

Health
10
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
11
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
12
Community Action Partnership of Sonoma County

We are a catalyst of equitable transformation, aligning partners and resources to implement values-based, data-driven, community-led solutions that help families reach their full potential. our vision - we see sonoma county transformed…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Progress Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Athletic Rehab Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%8%<5yr13%8%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr20%40%20–35yr16%26%35–55yr13%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%2%<5yr13%1%5–10yr19%2%10–20yr20%14%20–35yr16%67%35–55yr13%14%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/57
the rest of the field
11%
1,302/12,234

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

56 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 56 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/56
Grantees still filing
36/56
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $26,077,545 · HealthST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATIONQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $2,538,924 · HealthQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONBUCKELEW PROGRAMS — $1,155,900 · Health+15 more — $2,132,166 · Health+15 moreCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $1,713,132 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…THE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $825,000 · Human ServicesTHE CERES CO…TIDES CENTER — $750,000 · Human ServicesTIDES CENTERTHE LIVING ROOM CENTER — $400,000 · Human ServicesTHE LIVING R…ST JOSEPH HOME CARE NETWORK — $380,000 · Human ServicesST JOSEPH HO…MENTIS — $372,032 · Human ServicesMENTIS+6 more — $395,540 · Human Services+6 moreBURBANK HOUSINGSR CORPORATION — $2,200,000 · OtherBURBANK HOUS…WEST COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES — $1,045,000 · OtherWEST COUNTY …JAMBOREE HOUSING CORPORATION — $1,000,000 · OtherJAMBOREE HOU…COMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $284,486 · OtherCOMMITTEE ON…+14 more — $440,770 · Other+14 moreBURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,300,000 · Housing & ShelterBETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $13,000 · Housing & ShelterON THE MARGINS INC — $770,000 · Civil RightsLEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY — $313,293 · Crime & LegalCope Family Center — $266,500 · Crime & LegalREDWOOD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $378,182 · EducationBOTANICAL BUS — $75,000 · EducationSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Education
Health$31,904,535Human Services$4,835,704Other$4,970,256Housing & Shelter$1,513,000Civil Rights$770,000Crime & Legal$579,793Education$478,182

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $26,077,545 over 5y, 61% of budgetQUEEN OF THE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $2,538,924 over 2y, 41% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA — $1,713,132 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetBURBANK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $1,300,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetBUCKELEW PROGRAMS — $1,155,900 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetWEST COUNTY COMMUNITY SERVICES — $1,045,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetJAMBOREE HOUSING CORPORATION — $1,000,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetTHE CERES COMMUNITY PROJECT — $825,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetON THE MARGINS INC — $770,000 over 3y, 61% of budgetTIDES CENTER — $750,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSANTA ROSA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS — $460,673 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmbulatory Surgery Access Coalition — $430,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetTHE LIVING ROOM CENTER — $400,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetST JOSEPH HOME CARE NETWORK — $380,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetREDWOOD MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $378,182 over 1y, 45% of budgetMENTIS — $372,032 over 3y, 7.9% of budgetLEGAL AID OF SONOMA COUNTY — $313,293 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON THE SHELTERLESS — $284,486 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetCope Family Center — $266,500 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetALLIANCE MEDICAL CENTER INC — $254,151 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBETTY KWAN CHINN HOMELESS FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetAGEWELL PACE — $200,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetOLE HEALTH — $179,530 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER POINT INC — $159,032 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANIDAD THERAPY AND EDUCATION SERVICES — $153,540 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetNAMI Sonoma County — $130,266 over 2y, 16% of budgetMENDONOMA HEALTH ALLIANCE — $130,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetON THE MOVE — $105,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOPPERTOWER FAMILY MED CTR INC DBA ALEXANDER VALLEY HEALTHCARE — $99,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFOOD FOR THOUGHT — $90,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBOTANICAL BUS — $75,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY — $70,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPROGRESS FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVIA HEART PROJECT — $40,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetPuertas Abiertas Community Resource Center — $35,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCommunity Support Network — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNAPA VALLEY COMMUNITY ORGS ACTIVE IN DISASTER — $29,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetMOLLYS ANGELS — $27,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE ALL FACULTY ASSOCIATION — $25,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetATHLETIC REHAB CLINIC — $25,000 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetShare the Care Napa Valley — $25,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSANTA ROSA JUNIOR COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE NAPA VALLEY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Resources for Children — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA & SOLANO INC DBA GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTH BAY — $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetDOWNTOWN NAPA FARMERS MARKET CORPORATION — $15,204 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetGunilda Rianda Senior Center Association Rianda House Senior Activity Center — $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sonoma County Communi…McNabb FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…Community Foundation …Sonoma County Vintner…The California Wellne…Peter a & Vernice H G…St Joseph Health Syst…East Bay Community Fo…Queen of the Valley M…Marin Community Found…Tipping Point Communi…
Sonoma County Community FoundationCA51.1× affinity23 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sonoma County Community Foundation · McNabb Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · Sonoma County Vintners Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · St Joseph Health System Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Queen of the Valley Medical Center · Marin Community Foundation · Tipping Point Community

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Joseph Health Northern California LLC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    25report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home