· Public charity
Queen of the Valley Medical Center
As expressions of god's healing love, witnessed through the ministry of jesus, we are steadfast in serving all, especially those who are poor and vulnerable.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2018.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 6 grants below total $998,600 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,073,974 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $75,374 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2018
- $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $300k
- $250k+1 grant · $632k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| St Joseph Health System Foundation | $631,600 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES | $200,000 |
| EXODUS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $30,000 |
| VIA HEART PROJECT | $20,000 |
| MENTIS | $17,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $589k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +57% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2018, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA2× · 2017–2018 · $352k · revenue +67%
- MMENTIS2× · 2017–2018 · $148k · revenue +206%
- VHVIA HEART PROJECT2× · 2017–2018 · $55k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- CCCOLLABRIA CAREgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +40%
- OHOLE HEALTHgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $36k · revenue +178%
- AAAREA AGENCY ON AGING SERVING NAPA SOLANOone grant, 2017 · $32k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower people living with mental health and co-occurring substance use challenges to achieve recovery, self-sufficiency, and deeply connected, meaningful lives within their communities.we do this by: delivering culturally responsive…
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.
The Sonoma County Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) Program serves abused and neglected children coming before the Juvenile Court of Protection and Rehabilitation Services.
Progress foundation promotes rehabilitation and encourages the highest possible level of self-sufficiency for individuals who are living with and learning to manage a mental illness.
Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
Northern Valley Harm Reduction Coalition is a 501c3 Non-Profit and Physician Lead Harm Reduction Program. Our program provides life saving Naloxone, Overdose Reversal Training, Safe Use Supplies, Syringe Disposal, HIV/HCV Testing, Drug…
Form 990, part i, line 1, description of organization mission: to provide medical and forensic exams that are delivered by sexual assult nurse examiners (sanes) to children & adults; and to serve as an active member of a sexual assault…
Planned Parenthood Northern California generates healthier communities through the delivery of quality sexual and reproductive health care services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aldea Inc and the most unlike its peers is Exodus Foundation for Recovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JOSEPH HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF SANTA ROSA ↗
- Who funds MENTIS ↗
- Who funds EXODUS FOUNDATION FOR RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds VIA HEART PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Solano-Napa Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLABRIA CARE ↗
- Who funds OLE HEALTH ↗
- Who funds AREA AGENCY ON AGING SERVING NAPA SOLANO ↗
- Who funds Ambulatory Surgery Access Coalition ↗
- Who funds ON THE MOVE ↗
- Who funds NEWS ↗
- Who funds NAPA VALLEY CHILD ADVOCACY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN NAPA & SOLANO INC DBA GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTH BAY ↗
- Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF NAPA ↗
- Who funds Cope Family Center ↗
- Who funds ALDEA INC ↗
- Who funds Puertas Abiertas Community Resource Center ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH INITIATIVE NAPA COUNTY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · McNabb Foundation · St Joseph Health Northern California LLC · Napa Valley Vintners Healthy Community Fund · Community Foundation of the Napa Valley · The California Wellness Foundation · Peter a & Vernice H Gasser Foundation · Cope Family Center · Marin Community Foundation · The Vollmer Family Foundation · Winiarski Family Foundation · Syar Foundation Susan L Syar Director
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Queen of the Valley Medical Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.