Skip to content
St John Medical Center Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

St John Medical Center Inc

Rooted in the loving ministry of Jesus as healer, we commit ourselves to serving all persons with special attention to those who are poor and vulnerable.

$12M
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$14MHousing & Shelter$8.7MFood & Nutrition$5.4MReligion$4.9MEducation$4.1MHuman Services$3.3MRecreation & Sports$2.6MPhilanthropy$2.3MOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $365k
  • $50k–250k27 grants · $3.2M
  • $250k+10 grants · $7.9M
$97,200
Median grant
1
States reached
$290M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC$1,620,000
GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC$1,578,169
TULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$1,400,000
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPERTY SOLUTIONS IN$1,000,000
UNIVERSITY OF OK FOUNDATION$621,397
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$547,870
TULSA DAY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS INC$300,000
HEALTH OUTREACH PREVENTION EDUCATION INC$299,191
NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE INC$265,000
YOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC$250,000
THE COMMON GOOD INC$227,500
HUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY$225,000
GLOBAL GARDENS INCORPORATED$218,209
CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF TULSA$203,006
TULSA COUNTY TREASURER$189,916
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CIRCLE OF CARE INC: $133k → 16%CIRCLE OF CARE INC: $132k → 16%OKLAHOMA UNITED METHODIST CIRCLE OF CARE: $65k → 16%LILYFIELD INC: $20k → 16%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE INC: $265k → 14%THE COMMON GOOD INC: $228k → 14%GROWING TOGETHER INC: $1.0M → 15%THE COMMON GOOD INC: $111k → 14%GROWING TOGETHER INC: $1.0M → 15%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $80k → 14%URBAN STRATEGIES INC: $80k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE INC: $63k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE INC: $55k → 14%Neighbors Along the Line Inc: $48k → 14%THE COMMON GOOD INC: $35k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE INC: $25k → 14%THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $50k → 15%THE UMA CENTER INC: $85k → 15%THE UMA CENTER INC: $62k → 15%THE UMA CENTER INC: $62k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $1.1M → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $750k → 15%CROSSOVER HEALTH SERVICES INC: $175k → 15%RETURN TO HOPE INC: $125k → 15%Crossover Community Impact Inc: $124k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of St John Medical Center Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

St John Medical Center Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37M · 55 repeat orgs$7.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 40 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
12

Total granted

$37M
$7.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
0%

Still filing today

91%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $397k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5.6M · revenue +35% · 64% of their budget
  • HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $2.5M · revenue +42%
  • TULSA DAY CENTER INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • IH
    IN HIS IMAGE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $4.8M · revenue -12% · 78% of their budget
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA
    one grant, 2017 · $2.0M
  • RT
    RETURN TO HOPE INC
    one grant, 2024 · $125k · revenue 0% · 48% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
2
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
3
Diversity Center of Oklahoma Inc
Health
4
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
5
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
6
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
7
Crossover Health Services Inc

Crossover health services (chs) envisions a christian healthcare movement where faith, strong relationships, and shared resources drive community restoration and eliminate health disparities. we believe that healthcare is a right, not a…

Health
8
Tulsa County Medical Society Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to develop, create, and maintain programs in the tulsa area designed for health promotion, health education, and disease prevention and treatment through the professional expertise and engagement of the…

Philanthropy
9
Family Promise of Tulsa County Inc

Poverty alleviation/homelessness prevention

Housing & Shelter
10
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
11
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
12
The Urban Mission Inc

The organization provides emergency social and educational services to families in central oklahoma.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Growing Together Inc; the most unlike its peers is Make a New Way Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

15
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
67/68
Grantees still filing
31/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IN HIS IMAGE INC: $4,843,926 · OtherIN HIS IMAGE INCAFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPERTY SOLUTIONS INC: $2,500,000 · OtherAFFORDABLE HOUSING PROPERTY SOLUTIO…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA: $2,045,425 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMACity of Tulsa: $741,416 · Other+27 more: $4,419,440 · Other+27 moreGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,620,448 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN HEALT…OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $500,080 · HealthOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOM…HIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $424,054 · HealthHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc: $421,948 · HealthCOUNSELING SKILLZ ON WHEELZ: $407,750 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC: $388,000 · HealthMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $295,455 · Health+6 more: $484,124 · Health+6 moreUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $5,153,435 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OK…YOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC: $375,000 · EducationYOUTH MEDICAL ME…+9 more: $1,194,409 · Education+9 moreCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $2,123,389 · Human ServicesCROSSOVER COMM…GROWING TOGETHER INC: $2,000,000 · Human ServicesGROWING TOGETH…NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $455,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS ALON…THE COMMON GOOD INC: $373,047 · Human ServicesTHE COMMON GOO…CIRCLE OF CARE INC: $329,750 · Human ServicesCIRCLE OF CARE…THE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $261,150 · Human ServicesThe Uma Center Inc: $208,325 · Human Services+3 more: $305,000 · Human ServicesTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $4,200,000 · Housing & ShelterTULSA HABITAT…TULSA DAY CENTER INC: $1,350,000 · Housing & ShelterTULSA DAY CEN…+1 more: $146,742 · Housing & ShelterTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,275,740 · PhilanthropyMET CARES FOUNDATION INC: $410,000 · PhilanthropyDOWNTOWN TULSA PARTNERSHIP INC: $97,200 · PhilanthropyHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $2,520,000 · Food & NutritionFood on the Move Inc: $100,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$14,550,207Health$8,541,859Education$6,722,844Human Services$6,055,661Housing & Shelter$5,696,742Philanthropy$2,782,940Food & Nutrition$2,620,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $5,620,448 over 5y, 64% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $5,153,435 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetIN HIS IMAGE INC: $4,843,926 over 1y, 78% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $4,200,000 over 4y, 7.3% of budgetHUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC: $2,520,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,275,740 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC: $2,123,389 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGROWING TOGETHER INC: $2,000,000 over 2y, 29% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $1,350,000 over 5y, 5.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $500,080 over 5y, 13% of budgetNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $455,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetART 4ORMS FOUNDATION: $430,300 over 3y, 47% of budgetHIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES: $424,054 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetHealth Outreach Prevention Education Inc: $421,948 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetMET CARES FOUNDATION INC: $410,000 over 2y, 40% of budgetCOUNSELING SKILLZ ON WHEELZ: $407,750 over 2y, 71% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC: $388,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetYOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC: $375,000 over 2y, 52% of budgetTHE COMMON GOOD INC: $373,047 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetTULSA DREAM CENTER INC: $340,000 over 2y, 6.9% of budgetCIRCLE OF CARE INC: $329,750 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: $295,455 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGlobal Gardens Incorporated: $293,209 over 3y, 18% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $276,957 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetHUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY: $275,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetLEGAL AID SERVICES OF OKLAHOMA INC: $270,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CITY LIGHTS FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA: $261,150 over 2y, 21% of budgetCarabelles Legacy Inc: $259,605 over 2y, 45% of budgetNEBRASKA APPLESEED CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST: $250,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetEDUCATION FOR SCHOLARS INC: $223,000 over 3y, 24% of budgetUrban Coders Guild: $212,713 over 2y, 24% of budgetThe Uma Center Inc: $208,325 over 3y, 11% of budgetEast Tulsa Main Street aka Tulsa Global District: $194,138 over 2y, 53% of budgetCura For The World Foundation: $192,500 over 5y, 20% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $165,300 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetMISS WEARY'S FOUNDATION: $165,176 over 2y, 21% of budgetURBAN STRATEGIES INC: $160,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetGAINING GROUND CORPORATION: $150,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetREVITALIZE T-TOWN: $146,742 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetJAMES Inc: $126,800 over 2y, 35% of budgetHISTORIC GREENWOOD DISTRICT MAIN ST: $125,000 over 2y, 59% of budgetMAKE A NEW WAY FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 2y, 76% of budgetRETURN TO HOPE INC: $125,000 over 1y, 48% of budgetSUPPORTERS OF FAMILIES WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE: $125,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetNEW WORKFORCE DIRECTIONS INC: $122,500 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $116,720 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS INC: $112,500 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetBarthelmes Conservatory Inc: $112,500 over 2y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kaiser Family …Tulsa Community Found…The Anne and Henry Za…The Sharna and Irvin …Coretz Family Foundat…Zarrow Families Found…Oneok Foundation IncCharles and Lynn Schu…St John Health System…The Gelvin FoundationMorningcrest Healthca…Sanford P & Irene F B…
George Kaiser Family FoundationOK105.4× affinity50 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Coretz Family Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · St John Health System Inc · The Gelvin Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization St John Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from St John Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 330%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 13%
  • Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Association of Conservation Districts Inc: 40% of income from government
  • The Center for Housing Solutions Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Supporters of Families With Sickle Cell Disease: 26% of income from government
  • Morton Comprehensive Health Services Inc: 25% of income from government
  • Community Health Connection Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Legal Aid Services of Oklahoma Inc: 13% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Growing Together Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma: 8% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
33get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to St John Medical Center Inc?

Find your warmest path to St John Medical Center Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on St John Medical Center’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home