Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Zarrow Families Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
46
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Philanthropy$921kHealth$747kEducation$708kArts & Culture$688kHuman Services$591kCommunity Improvement$406kYouth Development$363kFood & Nutrition$349kOther$0
02FY2024 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $492k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $570k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
URBAN CODERS GUILD INC$100,000
OKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS INCORPORATED$75,000
SOUTH PEORIA NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION FOUNDATION INC$75,000
SMILES OF FAITH INC$70,000
HORTON RECORDS LTD$50,000
TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
THUNDER FELLOWS PROGRAM$50,000
TRI-CITY COLLECTIVE INC$50,000
GRAND MENTAL HEALTH$48,500
EAST TULSA MAIN STREET$46,000
BIRTHRIGHT LIVING LEGACY$35,000
FOUNDATION FOR TULSA SCHOOLS$35,000
CARABELLE'S LEGACY INC$33,000
YOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $395k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Funders Together to End Homelessnes: $5k → 16%LOCAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%Operation Restoration: $13k → 23%Funders Together to End Homelessnes: $5k → 16%Love INC of Greater Cushing: $1k → 19%John 316 Mission: $2k → 14%John 316 Mission: $2k → 14%EMERGENCY INFANT SERVICES: $25k → 15%Clarehouse: $5k → 15%Clarehouse: $5k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $63k → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $20k → 15%Crossover Community Impact Inc: $15k → 15%Domestic Violence Intervention Serv: $750 → 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC: $500 → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INCORPORATED: $50k → 15%CROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INCORPORATED: $47k → 15%Neighbor for Neighbor: $5k → 15%MARTHA'S FOUNDATION: $39k → 15%MARTHA'S FOUNDATION: $6k → 15%Life Senior Servcies Inc: $5k → 15%Community Action Project Tulsa Coun: $5k → 15%Community Action Project Tulsa Coun: $5k → 15%Life Senior Servcies Inc: $5k → 15%OKLAHOMA METHODIST MANOR: $1k → 15%HEARTS FOR HEARING FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%TRINITY WOODS: $1k → 15%TRINITY WOODS: $500 → 15%New Sanctuary Empowerment Center: $3k → 15%GREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER: $30k → 15%Family and Childrens Services: $6k → 15%Family and Childrens Services: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
MI
NY
MA
SD
CA
MD
NM
DC
OK
LA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Zarrow Families Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Zarrow Families Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 78 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

78 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 51 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
59

Total granted

$3.7M
$956k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+21%

Still filing today

74%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $308k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    Urban Coders Guild
    4× · 2021–2024 · $297k · revenue +64%
  • Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $193k · revenue +45%
  • MH
    Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma
    2× · 2019–2020 · $145k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • TULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $156k · revenue +39%
  • THE REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -46% · 29% of their budget
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
3
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
4
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
5
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
6
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
7
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
8
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
10
Tulsa Community Loan Fund Inc

To support community efforts to provide a greater supply of affordable housing in tulsa county and the surrounding area.

Housing & Shelter
11
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
12
Cdfi Friendly Tulsa Inc

CDFI Friendly Tulsa is bringing capital to Tulsa to address a range of unmet financing needs in communities of color.

Public Benefit

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Casa de la Cultura Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%12%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr16%21%20–35yr14%22%35–55yr14%19%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%9%<5yr14%11%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr14%20%35–55yr14%17%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/119
the rest of the field
15%
1,260/8,639

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

108 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 108 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
107/108
Grantees still filing
71/108
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $121,500 · OtherTHUNDER FELLOWS PROGRAM — $100,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $87,080 · OtherBIRTHRIGHT LIVING LEGACY INC — $85,500 · OtherTHEATRE NORTH — $82,100 · OtherHORTON RECORDS LTD — $130,000 · OtherHORTON RECORDS LTDTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $156,000 · OtherTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc — $192,500 · OtherMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa IncOKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS INC — $126,500 · Other+85 more — $1,348,094 · Other+85 moreTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $492,000 · PhilanthropyTULSA COMMUNITY FO…JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA — $237,500 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION …MET CARES FOUNDATION INC — $179,250 · PhilanthropyMET CARES FOUNDATI…+7 more — $26,850 · PhilanthropyMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $144,500 · HealthMental Healt…COMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC — $115,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HE…CHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $100,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S M…SUPPORTERS OF FAMILIES WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE — $80,000 · HealthSUPPORTERS O…SMILES OF FAITH INC — $70,000 · HealthSMILES OF FA…GRAND LAKE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $48,500 · HealthGRAND LAKE M…GUIDING RIGHT INC — $45,000 · HealthGUIDING RIGH…THE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES — $30,000 · Health+2 more — $19,650 · HealthUrban Coders Guild — $297,250 · EducationUrban Coder…The Foundation for Tulsa Schools — $75,900 · EducationThe Foundat…URBAN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $53,000 · EducationURBAN INNOV…The University of Tulsa — $31,500 · EducationThe Univers…YOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC — $30,000 · EducationTULSA HONOR ACADEMY INC — $25,000 · EducationMISS WEARY'S FOUNDATION — $20,000 · EducationSTREET SCHOOL INC — $19,800 · Education+4 more — $15,800 · EducationTULSA DREAM CENTER INC — $203,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC — $60,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $30,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $12,500 · Youth DevelopmentCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC — $111,500 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $84,000 · Human ServicesMartha's Foundation — $45,000 · Human ServicesGREENWOOD CULTURAL CENTER INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesEmergency Infant Services Inc — $25,000 · Human ServicesLOCAL MEDIA FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human Services+14 more — $81,240 · Human ServicesSOUTH PEORIA NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION FOUNDATION — $125,000 · Community ImprovementTRI-CITY COLLECTIVE INC — $110,500 · Community ImprovementEast Tulsa Main Street aka Tulsa Global District — $90,136 · Community Improvement
Other$2,429,274Philanthropy$935,600Health$652,650Education$568,250Youth Development$406,000Human Services$396,740Community Improvement$325,636

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $492,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetUrban Coders Guild — $297,250 over 4y, 15% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA — $237,500 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetTULSA DREAM CENTER INC — $203,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc — $192,500 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetMET CARES FOUNDATION INC — $179,250 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $156,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $144,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHORTON RECORDS LTD — $130,000 over 3y, 29% of budgetOKLAHOMA ASSOCIATION OF CONSERVATION DISTRICTS INC — $126,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetSOUTH PEORIA NEIGHBORHOOD CONNECTION FOUNDATION — $125,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $121,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH CONNECTION INC — $115,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCROSSOVER COMMUNITY IMPACT INC — $111,500 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetTRI-CITY COLLECTIVE INC — $110,500 over 3y, 39% of budgetTHE REED COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL RESEARCH INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEast Tulsa Main Street aka Tulsa Global District — $90,136 over 2y, 14% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT LIVING LEGACY INC — $85,500 over 3y, 19% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $84,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSUPPORTERS OF FAMILIES WITH SICKLE CELL DISEASE — $80,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetREVITALIZE T-TOWN — $77,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetLEADERSHIP TULSA INC — $76,500 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetThe Foundation for Tulsa Schools — $75,900 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetSMILES OF FAITH INC — $70,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCasa de la Cultura Inc — $61,500 over 2y, 45% of budgetNEW HOPE OKLAHOMA INC — $60,500 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetURBAN INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $53,000 over 3y, 34% of budget1ST STEP MALE DIVERSION PROGRAM INC — $52,189 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetNEW VENTURE FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRAND LAKE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC — $48,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMartha's Foundation — $45,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetGUIDING RIGHT INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJUST THE BEGINNING — $37,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetHispanic American Foundation Inc — $37,000 over 3y, 44% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCarabelles Legacy Inc — $33,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC — $32,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $31,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL CHALLENGES — $30,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetYOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC — $30,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTulsa Coalition of 100 Black Men Association — $28,000 over 2y, 56% of budgetBeHeard Movement Inc — $25,500 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA HONOR ACADEMY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMISS WEARY'S FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetLOCAL MEDIA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…George Kaiser Family …Tulsa Community Found…The Hardesty Family F…The Gelvin FoundationMaxine and Jack Zarro…The Sharna and Irvin …Coretz Family Foundat…Charles and Lynn Schu…Sanford P & Irene F B…Mervin Bovaird Founda…One Gas Foundation Inc
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK127.3× affinity63 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Gelvin Foundation · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Coretz Family Foundation · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Zarrow Families Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 450%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Up With Trees Inc — 100% of income from government
  • American Indian Resource Center Inc — 79% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Association of Conservation Districts Inc — 40% of income from government
  • Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc — 37% of income from government
  • Guiding Right Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Supporters of Families With Sickle Cell Disease — 26% of income from government
  • Community Health Connection Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services — 15% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
  • Int'l Orthodox Christian Charities Inc — 7% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
  • Grand Lake Mental Health Center Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
45get no government money at all
31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Zarrow Families Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Zarrow Families Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 154 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home