· Private foundation
Coretz Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k29 grants · $94k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $529k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $2.1M
- $250k+2 grants · $757k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $446,500 |
| CITY YEAR TULSA | $310,000 |
| GILCREASE MUSEUM | $200,000 |
| THE ASPEN INSTITUTE | $173,125 |
| HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA | $150,000 |
| MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OKLAHOMA | $115,000 |
| YOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP | $100,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $100,000 |
| STILL SHE RISES | $100,000 |
| READING PARTNERS | $100,000 |
| THE UMA CENTER | $100,000 |
| ACT HOUSE | $100,000 |
| OKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| LEADERSHIP TULSA | $100,000 |
| URBAN CODERS GUILD | $100,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $756k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
98 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $474k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
CITY YEAR INC7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +8%
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +243%
IRON GATE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $731k · revenue +136%
Funded once
- TCTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INCone grant, 2022 · $420k · revenue -28%
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS TULSAone grant, 2021 · $100k
Emergency Infant Services Incone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -26%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.
Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.
To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.
Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.
Kipp tulsa prepares students from educationally under-served neighborhoods in tulsa, ok with the academic, character and life skills necessary for success in college and the competitive world beyond.
United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.
The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…
The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.
To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.
The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…
The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.
Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Saint Francis Hospital Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 9% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
122 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 122 of the 216 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA POLICY INC ↗
- Who funds Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma ↗
- Who funds HIV Resource Consortium Inc dba Tulsa CARES ↗
- Who funds 36 DEGREES NORTH CO ↗
- Who funds TULSA AREA UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
- Who funds HUNGER FREE OKLAHOMA INC ↗
- Who funds TULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds Still She Rises Inc ↗
- Who funds RIVER PARKS AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds Urban Coders Guild ↗
- Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP TULSA INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD OPTION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Uma Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Black Wall Street Business Center ↗
- Who funds YOUTH MEDICAL MENTORSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds OKLAHOMA ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc ↗
- Who funds The Town & Country School Inc ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ABORTION FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF TULSA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: George Kaiser Family Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Zarrow Families Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc · Hille Family Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Coretz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hunger Free Oklahoma Inc — 100% of income from government
- Up With Trees Inc — 100% of income from government
- The Center for Housing Solutions Inc — 34% of income from government
- Domestic Violence Intervention Services — 15% of income from government
- Tulsa Community Foundation — 11% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Tulsa Day Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Growing Together Inc — 9% of income from government
- Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — 8% of income from government
- The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
- The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc — 4% of income from government
- Family & Childrens Services Inc — 1% of income from government
- Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc — 0% of income from government
- Global Gardens Incorporated — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.