Skip to content
Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners

Increasing the human potential of our community by providing opportunities for people in need.

$16M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$172k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$2.2MCommunity Improvement$131kCivil Rights$80kReligion$41kFood & Nutrition$23kHousing & Shelter$10k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $247,996, the rows itemized in this filing. The $16,121,756 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $15,873,760 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $172k
$12,791
Median grant
3
States reached
$32M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP -$172,364
ACCESS$22,053
RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION$18,110
UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK$12,791
COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN$10,398
COMMUNITY CONNECTION OF NE OREGON$6,306
KLAMATH LAKE COMMITY ACTION$5,974
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - LEWISTON: $253k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTION OF NE OREGON: $6k → 15%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $19k → 17%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $43k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN: $29k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - LEWISTON: $232k → 11%COMMUNITY CONNECTION OF NE OREGON: $1k → 15%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $15k → 17%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $43k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN: $17k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - LEWISTON: $188k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $13k → 17%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $31k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN: $15k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP -: $172k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $11k → 17%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $27k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN: $11k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - LEWISTON: $155k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $9k → 17%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $26k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN: $11k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - LEWISTON: $130k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $9k → 17%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $18k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN: $10k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - LEWISTON: $102k → 11%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $6k → 17%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $17k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN: $8k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - LEWISTON: $91k → 11%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $14k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 12 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$2.5M
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%
+392%

Still filing today

83%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsEducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +29%
  • RR
    RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $219k · revenue +96%
  • A
    ACCESS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +232%

Funded once

  • CM
    Carl Maxey Center
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -35%
  • NR
    Nuestras Raices Centro Comunitario DBA Nuestras Raicesgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +392%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mid-Columbia Community Action Council

To alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty in Wasco, Hood River, and Sherman Counties. The purpose of MCCAC shall be the promotion of self sufficiency in families and individuals within the low income economic ranges in the three…

—
2
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
3
Clatsop Community Action

Clatsop community action, inc. (cca) is an oregon nonprofit corporation whose mission is to assist low-income individuals and families meet housing, energy, food and other basic living needs in the clatsop county area of oregon. cca…

—
4
Seattle Indian Center
Human Services
5
Family Promise of Cowlitz County

To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.

Human Services
6
Clackamas Service Center

Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.

Human Services
7
Central Washington Hispanic Chamber of Commerce

We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.

Community Improvement
8
Central Oregon Villages

Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.

Housing & Shelter
9
Community Sharing Program

Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.

Human Services
10
Manzanita House

To embrace, equip, and empower immigrants through access to culturally informed essential services, and facilitate covnnections to grow deeper roots and thrive in Spokane.

Arts & Culture
11
Community Roots Collaborative

A non-profit developer of permanent, affordable, tiny homes for the unsettled residents of Clark County, Washington.

Housing & Shelter
12
Northwest Washington Indian Health Board

Federal grants and contracts were used to provide direct community and public health services within Native American communities in Northwest Washington

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Center; the most unlike its peers is Othello Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $1,323,809 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $219,343 · Human ServicesRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTIONCommunity Action Center: $99,211 · Human ServicesCommunity Action CenterUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $82,448 · Human Services+1 more: $4,997 · Human ServicesRICHARD ALLEN ENTERPRISES: $349,475 · OtherRICHARD ALLEN ENTERPRISE…ACCESS: $154,592 · OtherACCESSJESUS IS THE ANSWER APOSTOLIC CHURCH: $41,475 · OtherJESUS IS THE ANSWER APOS…LATINOS EN SPOKANE: $87,300 · Community ImprovementKLAMATH & LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES: $37,949 · Community ImprovementPacific Islander Community Association of WA: $80,050 · Civil RightsOTHELLO FOOD BANK: $22,780 · Food & NutritionCarl Maxey Center: $10,000 · Arts & CultureNuestras Raices Centro Comunitario DBA Nuestras Raices: $5,900 · Education
Human Services$1,729,808Other$545,542Community Improvement$125,249Civil Rights$80,050Food & Nutrition$22,780Arts & Culture$10,000Education$5,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $1,323,809 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $219,343 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetACCESS: $154,592 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Action Center: $99,211 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLATINOS EN SPOKANE: $87,300 over 3y, 8.0% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $82,448 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPacific Islander Community Association of WA: $80,050 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetKLAMATH & LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES: $37,949 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetOTHELLO FOOD BANK: $22,780 over 4y, 11% of budgetCarl Maxey Center: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY CONNECTION OF NE OREGON INC: $4,997 over 3y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS ↗
  • Who funds Community Action Center ↗
  • Who funds LATINOS EN SPOKANE ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds Pacific Islander Community Association of WA ↗
  • Who funds KLAMATH & LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds OTHELLO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds Carl Maxey Center ↗
  • Who funds Nuestras Raices Centro Comunitario DBA Nuestras Raices ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTION OF NE OREGON INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Innovia FoundationInatai FoundationSecond Harvest Inland…The Avista FoundationSeattle FoundationEmpire Health Communi…Empire Health Foundat…Better Health TogetherNorthwest Harvest EmmUmpqua Bank Charitabl…The Oregon Community …Harvest Against Hunger
Innovia FoundationWA20.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · The Avista Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Empire Health Community Advocacy Fund · Empire Health Foundation · Better Health Together · Northwest Harvest Emm · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Harvest Against Hunger

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 77%
  • United Community Action Network: 82% of income from government
  • Klamath & Lake Community Action Services: 77% of income from government
  • Access: 65% of income from government
  • Community Connection of Ne Oregon Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home