· Public charity
Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners
Increasing the human potential of our community by providing opportunities for people in need.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $247,996 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $16,121,756 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $15,873,760 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $63k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $172k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP - | $172,364 |
| ACCESS | $22,053 |
| RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION | $18,110 |
| UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK | $12,791 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER - WHITMAN | $10,398 |
| COMMUNITY CONNECTION OF NE OREGON | $6,306 |
| KLAMATH LAKE COMMITY ACTION | $5,974 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
12 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +29%
- RRRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION8× · 2017–2024 · $219k · revenue +96%
- AACCESS8× · 2017–2024 · $155k · revenue +232%
Funded once
- CMCarl Maxey Centerone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -35%
- NRNuestras Raices Centro Comunitario DBA Nuestras Raicesgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +392%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To alleviate the causes and conditions of poverty in Wasco, Hood River, and Sherman Counties. The purpose of MCCAC shall be the promotion of self sufficiency in families and individuals within the low income economic ranges in the three…
The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.
Clatsop community action, inc. (cca) is an oregon nonprofit corporation whose mission is to assist low-income individuals and families meet housing, energy, food and other basic living needs in the clatsop county area of oregon. cca…
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
Clackamas service center is an inclusive, "one-stop" community center for individuals and families seeking food relief and resources for improved health, dignity, and stability.
We increase access to economic opportunities for business owners, entrepreneurs, and individuals in Central Washington by connecting and providing them with resources, representation, and opportunities to build community.
Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.
Provide South Lane County community members with basic needs resources, life skills, and resources toward self-sufficiency.
To embrace, equip, and empower immigrants through access to culturally informed essential services, and facilitate covnnections to grow deeper roots and thrive in Spokane.
A non-profit developer of permanent, affordable, tiny homes for the unsettled residents of Clark County, Washington.
Federal grants and contracts were used to provide direct community and public health services within Native American communities in Northwest Washington
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Action Center and the most unlike its peers is Othello Food Bank. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
- Who funds ACCESS ↗
- Who funds Community Action Center ↗
- Who funds LATINOS EN SPOKANE ↗
- Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Pacific Islander Community Association of WA ↗
- Who funds KLAMATH & LAKE COMMUNITY ACTION SERVICES ↗
- Who funds OTHELLO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Carl Maxey Center ↗
- Who funds Nuestras Raices Centro Comunitario DBA Nuestras Raices ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CONNECTION OF NE OREGON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Innovia Foundation · Inatai Foundation · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · The Avista Foundation · Seattle Foundation · Empire Health Community Advocacy Fund · Empire Health Foundation · Better Health Together · Northwest Harvest Emm · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · Harvest Against Hunger
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Community Action Network — 82% of income from government
- Klamath & Lake Community Action Services — 77% of income from government
- Access — 65% of income from government
- Community Connection of Ne Oregon Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.