Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Harvest Against Hunger

To help feed hungry people with surplus nutritious produce.

$5.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.

Food & Nutrition$2.0M
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 46 grants below total $608,313 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,056,771 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $4,448,458 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k36 grants · $538k
$13,035
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIVING WELL KENT$30,000
SNOQUALMIE VALLEY FARMERS COOPERATIVE$22,500
PACIFIC ISLANDER HEALTH BOARD$22,500
AASH FARMS$22,500
MAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION$19,400
CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK$18,303
COASTAL HARVEST$17,864
EAGLE'S NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN$16,472
NOURISH PIERCE COUNTY$16,108
ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$15,485
WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY$15,230
NEW HUNGER COALITION$15,230
COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES$15,010
FEEDING FEASIBLE FEASTS$14,791
BLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL$14,643
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $604k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $17k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $14k → 11%EATONVILLE FAMILY AGENCY: $11k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOOD FOR ALL: $22k → 12%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $22k → 13%OIC YAKIMA: $25k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $16k → 17%COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES: $23k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER WHITMAN: $18k → 20%ARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $15k → 9%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $13k → 11%EATONVILLE FAMILY AGENCY: $9k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOOD FOR ALL: $14k → 12%OIC OF WASHINGTON: $13k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $12k → 17%COASTAL HARVEST: $18k → 18%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $11k → 20%OLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $8k → 11%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $25k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOOD FOR ALL: $9k → 12%OIC OF WASHINGTON: $13k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $12k → 17%COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES: $15k → 20%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $7k → 20%SKAGIT COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $11k → 11%OIC OF WASHINGTON: $10k → 17%OKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $7k → 17%COUNCIL ON AGING AND HUMAN SERVICES: $9k → 20%CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $31k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $10k → 11%RURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION: $9k → 13%COMMUNITY ACTION CENTER: $12k → 20%CHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL: $9k → 9%LOPEZ ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $10k → 11%LOPEZ ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 10%COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY: $5k → 11%HOPELINK: $20k → 9%HOPELINK: $14k → 9%HOPELINK: $10k → 9%HOPELINK: $9k → 9%EATONVILLE FAMILY AGENCY: $11k → 9%EAGLE'S NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $16k → 9%EAGLE'S NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $16k → 9%EAGLE'S NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN: $9k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.9M · 46 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against -8% for the ones you funded once.

46 repeat relationships — 37 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

46
3

Total granted

$1.9M
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-8%

Still filing today

87%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $157k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $82k · revenue +11%
  • EF
    EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +34%
  • CC
    CLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK
    8× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +69%

Funded once

  • GR
    GOOD RAIN FARM
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • YR
    Yakima Rotary Food Bank
    one grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue -8%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    one grant, 2024 · $7k · revenue -14%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
2
Snoqualmie Valley Food Bank

Our mission is to provide food and key resources to help our neighbors and community thrive. we lead the effort to feed, educated and advocate ending hunger in the snoqualmie valley and beyond.

Food & Nutrition
3
Feeding Washington

Create a strong and effective statewide infrastructure that efficiently leverages resources to expand capacity in Washington State's Feeding America network.

Food & Nutrition
4
Lake Chelan Food Bank

The mission of Lake Chelan Food Bank is to treat each person we serve with dignity and respect and to provide balanced and varied options that give each person the liberty to meet the specific food needs for themsevles and/or their family.

Food & Nutrition
5
West Seattle Food Bank

West Seattle Food Bank strengthens the community through the power of neighbors helping neighbors, working to ensure all in our community have access to the essential necessities of living.

Food & Nutrition
6
Columbia Pacific Food Bank

Columbia pacific food bank is the regional food distribution center for columbia county, oregon and local food pantry for the community of saint helens.

Food & Nutrition
7
Renewal Food Bank

Renewal Food Bank provides food to needy and economically vulnerable individuals who live in Bellevue, Washington and surrounding communities

Human Services
8
Nooksack Valley Food Bank Association

Our mission is to provide a variety of food products to families and individuals who are in need. We are open one day a week.

Food & Nutrition
9
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
10
Washington Food Coalition

To strengthen hunger relief providers in WA State.

—
11
Lake County Food Share Inc

Lake county food share inc is an organization whose purpose is to coordinate and to meet both supplemental and emergency food needs of families and individuals in lake county, oregon.

Food & Nutrition
12
Food Bank of Alaska

FBA believes no one deserves to be hungry. We are dedicated to eliminating hunger in Alaska by obtaining and providing food to partner agencies and through anti-hunger leadership.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Second Harvest Inland Northwest and the most unlike its peers is Praisealujah Discipleship. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number21%3%<5yr14%10%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr18%21%20–35yr13%44%35–55yr15%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value21%6%<5yr14%7%5–10yr20%7%10–20yr18%16%20–35yr13%49%35–55yr15%14%55yr+

The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/81
the rest of the field
12%
4,745/38,887

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/65
Grantees still filing
46/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Nourish Pierce County — $76,206 · OtherNourish Pierce CountyCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $74,752 · OtherCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANKWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY — $56,041 · OtherWASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITYCOASTAL HARVEST — $51,254 · OtherCOASTAL HARVESTKITSAP CD — $46,217 · OtherKITSAP CDFARMSTAND LOCAL FOODS — $45,130 · OtherFARMSTAND LOCAL FOODSFERNDALE FOOD BANK — $44,798 · OtherFERNDALE FOOD BANKUPPER VALLEY MEND — $44,606 · OtherUPPER VALLEY MENDLEWIS COUNTY FOOD BANK COALITION — $30,276 · OtherFARESTART — $25,632 · Other+16 more — $264,134 · Other+16 moreHOPELINK — $66,277 · Human ServicesHOPELINKOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON — $61,523 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CEN…COMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY — $61,494 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTYCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE — $57,959 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANECommunity Action Center — $47,537 · Human ServicesCommunity Action CenterCOUNCIL ON AGING & HUMAN SERVICES — $47,464 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AGING & HUMAN SERVICESOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $46,521 · Human ServicesOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION CO…EAGLES NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN — $41,478 · Human ServicesEAGLES NEST COMMUNITY KITCHENCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU — $39,669 · Human ServicesCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COUOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS — $34,613 · Human ServicesOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMSARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $32,690 · Human ServicesEatonville Area Council DBA Eatonville Family Agency — $31,750 · Human ServicesRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION — $30,954 · Human Services+2 more — $32,082 · Human ServicesBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL — $82,022 · Food & NutritionBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUN…EMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $79,198 · Food & NutritionEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF…THURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK — $68,262 · Food & NutritionTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANKFEEDING FEASIBLE FEASTS — $43,790 · Food & NutritionFEEDING FEASIBLE FEASTSGoodRoots Northwest — $35,072 · Food & NutritionGoodRoots NorthwestPROVIDENCE NORTHEAST WASHINGTON HUNGER COALITION — $30,460 · Food & NutritionPROVIDENCE NORTHEAST WASH…LIVING WELL KENT COLLABORATIVE — $30,000 · Food & NutritionLIVING WELL KENT COLLABOR…DARRINGTON FOOD BANK — $25,438 · Food & NutritionDARRINGTON FOOD BANKHunger Intervention Program — $23,512 · Food & NutritionOTHELLO FOOD BANK — $23,436 · Food & NutritionSOUTH WHIDBEY GOOD CHEER — $22,076 · Food & NutritionSOUTHWEST WASHINGTON LULAC FOUNDATION LATINOS UNIDOS Y FLORECIENDO — $58,341 · Arts & CultureMAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION — $50,640 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,966 · InternationalSeattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington — $35,341 · Community ImprovementFoundation for Sustainable Community — $9,401 · Community ImprovementFISH — $27,643 · Philanthropy
Other$759,046Human Services$632,011Food & Nutrition$463,266Arts & Culture$58,341International$57,606Community Improvement$44,742Philanthropy$27,643

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBLUE MOUNTAIN ACTION COUNCIL — $82,022 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD NETWORK OF TACOMA AND PIERCE COUNTY — $79,198 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNourish Pierce County — $76,206 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCLARK COUNTY FOOD BANK — $74,752 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHURSTON COUNTY FOOD BANK — $68,262 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOPELINK — $66,277 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF WASHINGTON — $61,523 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SKAGIT COUNTY — $61,494 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST WASHINGTON LULAC FOUNDATION LATINOS UNIDOS Y FLORECIENDO — $58,341 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SPOKANE — $57,959 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMAKING A DIFFERENCE FOUNDATION — $50,640 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Action Center — $47,537 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING & HUMAN SERVICES — $47,464 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetOKANOGAN COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COUNCIL INC — $46,521 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFERNDALE FOOD BANK — $44,798 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUPPER VALLEY MEND — $44,606 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFEEDING FEASIBLE FEASTS — $43,790 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetEAGLES NEST COMMUNITY KITCHEN — $41,478 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetCHELAN-DOUGLAS COMMUNITY ACTION COU — $39,669 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSeattle Good Business Network DBA Good Business Network of Washington — $35,341 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetGoodRoots Northwest — $35,072 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOLYMPIC COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMS — $34,613 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetARLINGTON COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $32,690 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEatonville Area Council DBA Eatonville Family Agency — $31,750 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetRURAL RESOURCES COMMUNITY ACTION — $30,954 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPROVIDENCE NORTHEAST WASHINGTON HUNGER COALITION — $30,460 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetLEWIS COUNTY FOOD BANK COALITION — $30,276 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetFISH — $27,643 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFARESTART — $25,632 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDARRINGTON FOOD BANK — $25,438 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetHELPING HANDS FOOD BANK — $23,876 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHunger Intervention Program — $23,512 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetOTHELLO FOOD BANK — $23,436 over 2y, 7.5% of budgetSOUTH WHIDBEY GOOD CHEER — $22,076 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetORCAS ISLAND FOOD BANK — $21,984 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRAINIER VALLEY FOOD BANK — $20,911 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOASTAL HARVEST — $17,864 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIFELONG HEALTH FOR ALL — $14,526 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOPEZ ISLAND FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $14,218 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWHITE CENTER EMERGENCY FOOD ASSOCIATION WHITE CENTER FOOD BANK — $14,099 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIDAY HARBOR FOOD BANK — $13,925 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetFoundation for Sustainable Community — $9,401 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetYakima Rotary Food Bank — $6,983 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $6,966 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northwest Harvest EmmFood LifelinePuget Sound Energy Fo…Seattle FoundationThe Albertsons Compan…Second Harvest Inland…The Kroger Co Zero Hu…United Way of King Co…Washington Federal Fo…The Norcliffe Foundat…Credit Unions in the …Dutch Bros Foundation
Northwest Harvest EmmWA78.6× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northwest Harvest Emm · Food Lifeline · Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Albertsons Companies Foundation · Second Harvest Inland Northwest · The Kroger Co Zero Hunger Zero Waste Foundation · United Way of King County · Washington Federal Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · Credit Unions in the State of Washington · Dutch Bros Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Harvest Against Hunger funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    31report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines