Loading…
· Public charity
SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT
The mission of swop is to empower the disenfranchised in the southwest to realize racial and gender equality, and social and economic justice.
$16k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants
1
Communities
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
0180% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2023.
Human Services$64kPhilanthropy$33kCivil Rights$26kCommunity Improvement$23kEnvironment$6kOther$37k
02FY2023 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
- EARTH CARE INTERNATIONAL$6,000
02The need
03
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
New Mexico Child Advocacy Networks
Nmcan partners with young people to build community, promote equity and lead change.
—
2
La Plaza De Encuentro
To provide educational programs, services, resources and information, and leadership development to low income latinos in new mexico.
Human Services
3
Nm Comunidades En Accion Y De Fe
CAFE is a faith based Non Profit community organization with the purpose of training and organizing low and moderate income families to shape public policy.
Human Services
4
El Centro Poder Y Accion
El centro poder y accion is an albuquerque-based civil rights and workers' justice organization that advocates for just working conditions and policies that ensure all new mexicans' have the opportunity to thrive. we focus on growing the…
Civil Rights
5
New Mexico Immigrant Law Center
To provide legal services to new mexico's low-income immigrants and their families; to educate new mexico immigrant families, service providers, and the general public on legal issues unique to non-citizens; and to increase support for new…
Human Services
6
New Mexico Voices for Children
To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexico's children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…
Civil Rights
7
El Pueblo
El Pueblo will provide a full range of legal services and other support services to low-income immigrants seeking family reunification, citizenship, and protection from persecution and violence.
Human Services
8
New Mexico Ballet Company
To create and promote professional and innovative dance productions for New Mexico audiences while providing the highest caliber of education and training for young artists in the community.
Arts & Culture
9
Colectiva Legal Del Pueblo
Colectiva Legal del Pueblo is a non-hierarchal collective organization founded for and by undocumented immigrants working to build community leadership and power for migrant justice through legal services, advocacy and education.
Civil Rights
10
Association of Chinese-American Engineers and Scientists of New Mexico
Science & Tech
11
Thrive in Southern New Mexico
Funding to local impact partners as part of the organization's multi-year community plan focused on achieving outcomes in the four specific areas determined to be essential in improving people's lives and strengthening our community: 1)…
Philanthropy
12
New Mexico Foundation
To ensure that government is accountable to the voters and taxpayers.
Crime & Legal
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Working Classroom Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2018–2024.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Human Services$63,522Other$37,013Philanthropy$33,345Civil Rights$26,091Community Improvement$22,555Environment$6,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Albuquerque Community FoundationNM18× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Center for Civic Policy · Center for Action and Contemplation · Community Foundation of Southern · The Schmidt Family Foundation · Annie E Casey Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~22 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.2× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 264675255 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on EL CENTRO DE IGUALDAD Y DERECHOS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 22 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 10% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Southwest Organizing Project?
Find your warmest path to Southwest Organizing Project through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines