Skip to content
South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers at a glance

· Public charity

South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers

Championing pregnancy centers across South Carolina to provide comprehensive care and support, ensuring women and men have the resources they need to make informed choices for themselves and their children.

$2.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Health$3.3MHuman Services$588kEducation$266kCivil Rights$139k
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k15 grants · $2.6M
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$180,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PC & Clinic of the LowCountry$280,000
Sumter Pregnancy Center$180,000
CrossRoads Womens Center$180,000
LaVie PCC$180,000
A Choice to Make$180,000
Carolina PC$180,000
Radiance Womens Center$180,000
Foothills PC$180,000
LifeChoices Preganancy Care$180,000
DayBreak Life Care Center$180,000
Anderson PC$180,000
Hope for Life Pregancy Center$160,000
Divine Fountain of Hope Women$160,000
PC of Dillon County$160,000
HopeWomens Center$160,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–25, $985k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Lifebridge of South Carolina: $160k → 17%A Choice to Make: $180k → 20%Lifebridge: $126k → 17%A Choice to Make: $139k → 20%Piedmont Womens Center: $126k → 10%The Advocacy Center: $126k → 14%A Choice to Make: $126k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 16 repeat orgs$825k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +19% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
4

Total granted

$6.3M
$505k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+2%

Still filing today

94%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $320k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCivil RightsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PREGNANCY CENTER AND CLINIC OF THE LOW COUNTRY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $546k · revenue +71%
  • GW
    GREENWOOD WOMENS CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $446k · revenue +33% · 60% of their budget
  • CP
    CAROLINA PREGNANCY CENTER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $446k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • LP
    LOWCOUNTRY PREGNANCY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $126k · revenue +2%
  • PW
    PIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $126k · revenue +3%
  • TA
    THE ADVOCACY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $126k · revenue -86% · 79% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Willow Womens Center

The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.

Human Services
2
Life Choice Pregnancy Center of Western North Carolina

Choosing Life over Abortion

Human Services
3
Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc
—
4
Center for Pregnancy Choices

Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.

Health
5
Alpha Womens Center

Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.

Human Services
6
Hopeline Women's Center Inc

The organization is a pregnancy counseling service dedicated to promoting the sanctity of human life by providing education and christ centered counseling, guidance, and support for pregnant women.

Unclassified
7
A Woman's Choice

Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.

—
8
Hope Life Center Inc

Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.

Human Services
9
Carolina Pregnancy Center Inc

The Carolina Pregnancy Center is a nonprofit ministry serving women, and their families, who are seeking help in making decisions about their pregnancy and well-being. Services include: Counseling, continuing emotional support, referrals…

Health
10
South Texas Pregnancy Care Center

Crisis pregnancy counseling.

Health
11
Springfield Pregnancy Care Center Inc
Human Services
12
Ny New Hope Pregnancy Resource Center
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Center and Clinic of the Low Country Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Advocacy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
14/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PREGNANCY CENTER AND CLINIC OF THE LOW COUNTRY INC: $545,666 · HealthPREGNANCY CENTER AND CLINIC OF THE LOW COUNTRY INCCAROLINA PREGNANCY CENTER: $445,667 · HealthCAROLINA PREGNANCY CENTERANDERSON LIFE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $445,667 · HealthANDERSON LIFE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTERFOOTHILLS CARE CENTER INC: $445,666 · HealthFOOTHILLS CARE CENTER INCLAVIE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $445,666 · HealthLAVIE PREGNANCY CARE CENTERSUMTER PREGNANCY CENTER: $445,666 · HealthSUMTER PREGNANCY CENTERAIKEN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $445,666 · HealthAIKEN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INCHope for Life Pregnancy Center: $320,000 · HealthHope for Life Pregnancy CenterPALMETTO WOMEN'S CENTER: $265,666 · HealthPALMETTO WOMEN'S CENTERHOPE WOMENS CENTER INC: $265,666 · HealthHOPE WOMENS CENTER INC+2 more: $252,666 · Health+2 moreABC Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc: $445,667 · Human ServicesABC Crisis Preg…LIFEBRIDGE OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $286,333 · Human ServicesLIFEBRIDGE OF S…PIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER: $126,333 · Human ServicesPIEDMONT WOMEN'…THE ADVOCACY CENTER: $126,333 · Human ServicesTHE ADVOCACY CE…DAYBREAK INC: $445,667 · Civil RightsDAYBREAK IN…THE PREGNANCY CENTER OF DILLON COUN: $299,333 · Civil RightsTHE PREGNAN…BEAUFORT WOMENS CENTER: $445,666 · OtherBEAUFORT W…DIVINE FOUNTAIN OF HOPE WOMENS CENTER: $230,000 · OtherDIVINE FOU…GREENWOOD WOMENS CENTER: $445,667 · Education
Health$4,323,662Human Services$984,666Civil Rights$745,000Other$675,666Education$445,667

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPREGNANCY CENTER AND CLINIC OF THE LOW COUNTRY INC: $545,666 over 3y, 18% of budgetGREENWOOD WOMENS CENTER: $445,667 over 3y, 60% of budgetCAROLINA PREGNANCY CENTER: $445,667 over 3y, 15% of budgetANDERSON LIFE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $445,667 over 3y, 37% of budgetABC Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc: $445,667 over 3y, 37% of budgetDAYBREAK INC: $445,667 over 3y, 24% of budgetBEAUFORT WOMENS CENTER: $445,666 over 3y, 41% of budgetFOOTHILLS CARE CENTER INC: $445,666 over 3y, 22% of budgetLAVIE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER: $445,666 over 3y, 31% of budgetSUMTER PREGNANCY CENTER: $445,666 over 3y, 50% of budgetAIKEN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC: $445,666 over 3y, 31% of budgetTHE PREGNANCY CENTER OF DILLON COUN: $299,333 over 2y, 76% of budgetLIFEBRIDGE OF SOUTH CAROLINA: $286,333 over 2y, 51% of budgetPALMETTO WOMEN'S CENTER: $265,666 over 2y, 15% of budgetHOPE WOMENS CENTER INC: $265,666 over 2y, 61% of budgetLOWCOUNTRY PREGNANCY CENTER: $126,333 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetPIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER: $126,333 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetTHE ADVOCACY CENTER: $126,333 over 1y, 79% of budgetCHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP: $126,333 over 1y, 42% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Knights of Columbus C…South Carolina Christ…Duke Energy FoundationCentral Carolina Comm…Natl Christian Charit…Edward Jones Foundati…Vanguard Charitable E…National Philanthropi…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Knights of Columbus Charities IncCT21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers?

    Find your warmest path to South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home