South Carolina · Nonprofit
CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP
CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP (South Carolina) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $151,683 to it, the largest being South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers ($126,333). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 6,881 health nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 6,881 health nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Save the Storksshared fundersportfolio match
- Knights of Columbus Charities Incshared fundersportfolio match
- Hamrick Mills Foundation Inclocal
The organization over time
Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
How it's funded, over time
Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.
Government-grant reliance: 2018 9% · 2019 8% · 2020 8% · 2021 9% · 2022 10% · 2023 46% · 2024 12% · 2025 24%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
69% of CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).
Surplus & reserves
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
reserve
Who funds it, year by year
2020 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $600 → $134k.
1 of 5 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 15% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP leans on a few funders — its largest provides 83% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
98% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2020 100% · 2021 68% · 2022 93% · 2023 94% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
98% of CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP's grant income comes from South Carolina funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $23k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Save the Storksshared fundersportfolio matchCO · backs 3 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Knights of Columbus Charities Incshared fundersportfolio matchCT · backs 8 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- Hamrick Mills Foundation InclocalSC · funds 10 organizations near you
- Care Netportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Carolina Pregnancy Care Fellowshipportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Mission Pre-Born Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Vitamin Angel Alliance Incshared fundersportfolio matchCA · backs 2 organizations that share your funders · its grantees resemble your mission
- West Virginia Pregnancy Center Coalition Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- 4 USportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Columbian Charities of Mo Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Vitamin Bridgeportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Arkansas Right to Life Inc Ed Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In South Carolina
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Where the money goes
74% of spending goes to programs.
Governance
Public support
75%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP?
- CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP (South Carolina) receives grants from 5 organizations whose IRS filings report $151,683 to it, the largest being South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers ($126,333). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP have?
- IRS filings report 5 organizations giving $151,683 in grants to CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP, 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP?
- South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers is the largest funder on record, with $126,333 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Carolina. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 5funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing