· Public charity
South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers
Championing pregnancy centers across South Carolina to provide comprehensive care and support, ensuring women and men have the resources they need to make informed choices for themselves and their children.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Anderson PC | $139,334 |
| A Choice to Make | $139,334 |
| CrossRoads Womens Center | $139,334 |
| Carolina PC | $139,334 |
| DayBreak Life Care Center | $139,334 |
| Radiance Womens Center | $139,333 |
| HopeWomens Center | $139,333 |
| Foothills PC | $139,333 |
| PC & Clinic of the LowCountry | $139,333 |
| Sumter PC | $139,333 |
| LifeChoices | $139,333 |
| LaVie PCC | $139,333 |
| Palmetto Womens Center | $139,333 |
| PC of Dillon County | $139,333 |
| Divine Fountain of Hope Women | $70,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $645k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $209k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CPCAROLINA PREGNANCY CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $266k · revenue +27%
- ACABC Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc2× · 2023–2024 · $266k · revenue +30% · 34% of their budget
- ALANDERSON LIFE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER2× · 2023–2024 · $266k · revenue +22% · 34% of their budget
Funded once
- PWPIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTERone grant, 2023 · $126k · revenue +3%
- CPCHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORPone grant, 2023 · $126k · revenue -29% · 42% of their budget
- TATHE ADVOCACY CENTERone grant, 2023 · $126k · revenue -86% · 79% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The organization offers medical services and resources to women who are or might be pregnant at no cost.
Choosing Life over Abortion
Free pregnancy medical clinic with the purpose of helping families through education, medical services, peer counseling, and material support to be fully educated and equipped to carry to term and/or parent if they so choose.
Alpha women's center operates mobile medical clinics serving women with pregnancy needs by providing medical, material and emotional support.
Pregnancy center dedicated to protecting the sanctity of human life.
Crisis pregnancy counseling.
Our mission at hope life center is to reach the community with the gospel of jesus christ by meeting physical, emotional and spiritual needs of women, men and their unborn children.
Our mission is to provide services to women with unplanned pregnancies in a compassionate and respectful environment
The center offers free pregnancy testing, options counseling, abstinance counseling and the distribution of baby care items and prenatal vitamins
The center provides free pregnancy tests, limited o.b. ultrasounds, non- professional peer counseling, free literature & brochures on topics related to pregnancy and spiritual issues, emergency support for clients in the form of maternity…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pregnancy Center and Clinic of the Low Country Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Advocacy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DAYBREAK INC ↗
- Who funds GREENWOOD WOMENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds CAROLINA PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ABC Crisis Pregnancy Center Inc ↗
- Who funds ANDERSON LIFE CRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FOOTHILLS CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BEAUFORT WOMENS CENTER ↗
- Who funds AIKEN PREGNANCY CARE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PALMETTO WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds SUMTER PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAVIE PREGNANCY CARE CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPE WOMENS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY CENTER AND CLINIC OF THE LOW COUNTRY INC ↗
- Who funds THE PREGNANCY CENTER OF DILLON COUN ↗
- Who funds PIEDMONT WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHEROKEE PREGNANCY CENTER INCORP ↗
- Who funds THE ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LOWCOUNTRY PREGNANCY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LIFEBRIDGE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Knights of Columbus Charities Inc · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Central Carolina Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Edward Jones Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers?
Find your warmest path to South Carolina Association of Pregnancy Care Centers through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.