Skip to content

· Private foundation

Smith - Fuqua Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$427k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$172k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$897kHousing & Shelter$435kHuman Services$427kHealth$386kCrime & Legal$220kAnimals$156kRecreation & Sports$150kReligion$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $192k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $222k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$6.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUND$172,347
KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION$50,000
AUTOIMMUNE HEPATITUS ASSOC$44,610
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE KOKOMO$30,000
SAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC$25,000
MADISON CO SPECIAL OLYMPICS$25,000
KOKOMO HUMANE SOCIETY$20,000
TURNING POINT SOC INC$15,000
HOPEWELL CENTER INC$12,000
KOKOMO YMCA$10,000
THE LITERACY COALITION$10,000
MADISON CO HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$5,000
HEART TO HONDURAS$2,500
LABS4RESCUE$1,021
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $462k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $100k → 15%HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $25k → 15%HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $25k → 15%HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $15k → 15%HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $12k → 15%HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $12k → 15%HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $10k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 15%HOPEWELL CENTER INC: $8k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $50k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $30k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $20k → 15%TURNING POINT SOC INC: $15k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $15k → 15%KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 15%TURNING POINT SOC INC: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 23 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
8

Total granted

$2.7M
$63k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+163%

Still filing today

43%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsCrime & LegalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Indiana State University Foundation Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $744k · revenue +24%
  • KR
    KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $230k · revenue +88%
  • HC
    Hopewell Center Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $207k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS-MADISON COUNTY
    one grant, 2021 · $28k
  • HA
    HOPE AIR
    one grant, 2017 · $23k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Care Management Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

—
2
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
3
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
4
Salem Christian Homes Inc

Board, care and training of physically and mentally handicapped adults.

Human Services
5
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
6
Four County Comprehensive Mental Health Center Inc

Dedicated to holistic care given with compassion, respect, acceptance and hope. achieving emotional well being and independence.

Health
7
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
8
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
9
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
10
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
11
National Church Residences At Home Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kokomo Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Auto-Immune Hepatitis Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Indiana State University Foundation Inc: $744,472 · EducationIndiana State University Foundati…Literacy Coalition of Kokomo Howard County Inc: $55,000 · EducationLiteracy Coalition of Kokomo Howa…+2 more: $10,050 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE KOKOMO: $190,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF TH…MADISON CO SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $121,624 · OtherMADISON CO SPECIAL OLYMPIC…Indiana University School of Medicine: $97,922 · OtherIndiana University School …THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KOKOMO INDIANA: $70,000 · OtherTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN …MADISON CO HUMANE SOCIETY: $33,500 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS-MADISON COUNTY: $28,050 · OtherHOPE AIR: $23,100 · Other+13 more: $93,721 · Other+13 moreAUTO-IMMUNE HEPATITIS ASSOCIATION: $360,965 · HealthAUTO-IMMUNE HEPATITI…SAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC: $150,000 · HealthSAMARITAN CAREGIVERS…KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC: $230,000 · Human ServicesKOKOMO RESCUE MISS…Hopewell Center Inc: $206,500 · Human ServicesHopewell Center In…TURNING POINT - SYSTEMS OF CARE: $25,000 · Human ServicesTURNING POINT - SY…BONA VISTA PROGRAMS INC: $220,000 · Crime & LegalKOKOMO HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $115,300 · AnimalsCENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $470 · Religion
Education$809,522Other$657,917Health$510,965Human Services$461,500Crime & Legal$220,000Animals$115,300Philanthropy$500Religion$470

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana State University Foundation Inc: $744,472 over 8y, 3.0% of budgetAUTO-IMMUNE HEPATITIS ASSOCIATION: $360,965 over 7y, 49% of budgetKOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC: $230,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetBONA VISTA PROGRAMS INC: $220,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHopewell Center Inc: $206,500 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetSAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC: $150,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetKOKOMO HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $115,300 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KOKOMO INDIANA: $70,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetLiteracy Coalition of Kokomo Howard County Inc: $55,000 over 8y, 6.2% of budgetTURNING POINT - SYSTEMS OF CARE: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLABS4RESCUE INC: $5,071 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $470 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Charitable Childrens Fund of America Inc: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Indiana State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds AUTO-IMMUNE HEPATITIS ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KOKOMO RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BONA VISTA PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Hopewell Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC ↗
  • Who funds KOKOMO HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF KOKOMO INDIANA ↗
  • Who funds Literacy Coalition of Kokomo Howard County Inc ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT - SYSTEMS OF CARE ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds LABS4RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL NEW YORK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds The Charitable Childrens Fund of America Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Howard CountyIN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Howard County · Duke Energy Foundation · United Way of Howard County Inc · Community Health Network Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Smith - Fuqua Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Smith - Fuqua Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Smith - Fuqua Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Smith - Fuqua Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Smith - Fuqua’s filings →

    More from the funding graph