· Public charity
Community Health Network Inc
Community health network, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $5,397,170 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,877,118 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $479,948 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k16 grants · $629k
- $250k+1 grant · $4.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION | $4,768,621 |
| LIFESMART YOUTH | $45,000 |
| SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES | $45,000 |
| JOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER | $45,000 |
| MINORITY HEALTH COALITION OF MADISON COUNTY | $45,000 |
| THE GILEAD HOUSE | $45,000 |
| HORIZON HOUSE INC | $45,000 |
| THE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC | $45,000 |
| WESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC | $45,000 |
| SEKHEM INSTITUTE FOR HOLISTIC HEALING IN | $45,000 |
| GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA | $45,000 |
| SHEPHERD COMMUNITY INC | $45,000 |
| OPERATION LOVE MINISTRIES INC | $40,000 |
| STILL WATERS ADULT DAY CENTER | $36,488 |
| SAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC | $27,061 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $201k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $29M · revenue +128% · 31% of their budget
- JPJANE PAULEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC2× · 2017–2018 · $1.0M · revenue +116%
- GIGreater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Inc3× · 2019–2021 · $300k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- ITIVY TECH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $6.9M · revenue +4%
- CFCENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INCone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -50%
- CTCATHEDRAL TRUSTEES INCone grant, 2019 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…
Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.
We exist to serve our patients with compassionate health care of the highest quality.
Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Covering Kids & Families of Indiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Ross Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH NETWORK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JANE PAULEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds IHA HOSPITAL ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Greater Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds MINORITY HEALTH COALITION OF MADISON COUNTY ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION LOVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF WELLNESS FOR URBAN WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES OF IN/KY INC ↗
- Who funds Gilead House ↗
- Who funds THE IMMIGRANT WELCOME CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WESTMINSTER NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds JOHN H BONER COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PACE INC ↗
- Who funds TURNING POINT - SYSTEMS OF CARE ↗
- Who funds Marian University ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis ↗
- Who funds Indiana Chamber of Commerce Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HORIZON HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY INDIANA ↗
- Who funds Warren Arts and Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Shepherd Community Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ROSS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LITTLE RED DOOR CANCER AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN CAREGIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds Butler University ↗
- Who funds COVERING KIDS & FAMILIES OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA COALITION TO END SEXUAL ASSAULT INC ↗
- Who funds RIGHT FIT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Second Helpings Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Community Foundation of Howard County
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Health Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.