Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Sigavis Shermanna Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$120kPublic Safety & Disaster$44kArts & Culture$34kPhilanthropy$30kHuman Services$10kAnimals$4kHealth$1kReligion$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$526k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY$2,500
PUENTES BRIDGES INC$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%BERT'S BIG ADVENTURE: $300 → 13%OUTREACH INC: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
IN
CA
TN
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Sigavis Shermanna Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Sigavis Shermanna Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.4% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$196k · 6 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
7

Total granted

$196k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+23%

Still filing today

100%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 29% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationPublic Safety & DisasterAnimalsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC
    3× · 2018–2023 · $44k · revenue +129%
  • ET
    EAST TENNESSEE ALLIANCE FOR ANIMALS
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +23%
  • BT
    BEYOND TYPE 1
    2× · 2018–2019 · $1k · revenue +175%

Funded once

  • OI
    OUTREACH INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +42%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +23%
  • DC
    DANCING CLASSROOMS VIRGIN ISLANDS
    one grant, 2021 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Chattanooga Regional Homeless Coalition Inc

To advocate for people who are homless or near homeless, strategically planning for housing and services in the community, maximizing resources and collaboarating with community partners to implement housing and services within the…

Community Improvement
3
Volunteer East Tennessee

Volunteer East Tennessee inspires service by equipping organizations and mobilizing volunteers to connect with one another and strengthen communities.

4
Ummah Relief International

Ummah relief international is a dedicated grassroots relief organization providing humanitarian services to bring help and hope to thousands of victims of natural and human disasters with quick and targeted action.

International
5
Friends of the Zoo Inc

Support operations of a zoo for the education and enjoyment of individuals living in and visiting chattanooga, tennessee.

Animals
6
UniversalGiving

Our mission is to connect people to quality giving and volunteer opportunities worldwide. universalgiving is a 501(c)3 nonprofit organization, whose vision is to create a world where giving and volunteering are a natural part of everyday…

Philanthropy
7
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
8
Crossroads Christian Counseling

Crossroads combines innovative clinical counseling with a redemptive worldview to restore people to emotional health, relational unity, and a hopeful future.

Human Services
9
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
10
Unify the World

Description of organization mission: unify is a global nonprofit for world peace and impact. unify orchestrates global synchronized events that inspire community-driven action campaigns for world peace. during these events, we invite…

International
11
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
12
Population Connection

Overpopulation threatens the quality of life for people everywhere. population connection is the national grassroots population organization that educates young people and advocates progressive action to stabilize world population at a…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater Chattanooga and the most unlike its peers is Puentes-Bridges Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INCALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $44,000 · Public Safety & DisasterALL HANDS AND HEARTS…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOU…UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA — $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF…ROOT RIVER CURRENT INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureROOT RIVER C…PRESTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,500 · Arts & CulturePRESTON HIST…OUTREACH INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA INC — $500 · Human Services+1 more — $300 · Human ServicesDANCING CLASSROOMS VIRGIN ISLANDS — $3,600 · OtherCORMARIA RETREAT CENTER IN — $1,000 · OtherEAST TENNESSEE ALLIANCE FOR ANIMALS — $3,000 · OtherBEYOND TYPE 1 — $1,000 · OtherWorld Organization — $1,000 · OtherPUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED — $3,000 · International
Education$120,000Public Safety & Disaster$44,000Philanthropy$30,000Arts & Culture$27,500Human Services$10,800Other$9,600International$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CHATTANOOGA FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $44,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOUTREACH INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEAST TENNESSEE ALLIANCE FOR ANIMALS — $3,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetPRESTON HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBEYOND TYPE 1 — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Organization — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBERT'S BIG ADVENTURE INC — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC11.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Sigavis Shermanna Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph