Wisconsin · Nonprofit
PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED
PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED (Wisconsin) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,125 to it, the largest being SIGAVIS SHERMANNA FOUNDATION ($3,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,653 international nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,653 international nonprofits under $100k, FY2025
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Henry H Uihlein (Sr) and Marion (Polly) S Uihlein Foundation Incshared funders
- The Bronx Council on the Arts Incorporatedportfolio match
- National Association of Latino Arts and Cultureportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
2021 → 2023: the base narrowed from 2 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $3k → $125.
From the IRS filings of PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED leans on a few funders — its largest provides 73% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 67% · 2023 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED draws 76% of its grant income from funders outside Wisconsin, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Henry H Uihlein (Sr) and Marion (Polly) S Uihlein Foundation Incshared fundersWI · backs 3 organizations that share your funders
- The Bronx Council on the Arts Incorporatedportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- National Association of Latino Arts and Cultureportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Burning Man Projectportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Lower Manhattan Cultural Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Springboard for the Artsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Alliance for California Traditional Artsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Role Model Movement Inc (NFP)portfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Flushing Council on Culture and the Artsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Brooklyn Arts Council Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Fractured Atlas Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Fundacion Puertorriquea de Las Humanidades Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Wisconsin
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
48%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED?
- PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED (Wisconsin) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $4,125 to it, the largest being SIGAVIS SHERMANNA FOUNDATION ($3,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $4,125 in grants to PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED?
- SIGAVIS SHERMANNA FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $3,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like PUENTES-BRIDGES INCORPORATED find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Wisconsin. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2025–2025), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing