How much does Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure give?

Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure reported 35 grants totaling $5,551,739 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 25 and 28 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Philanthropy (63%), Health (14%), Arts & Culture (9%).

Who are Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago ($13M), United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc ($2.3M), Spertus Institute for Jewish Learning and Leadership ($731k).

Does Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Which funders back the same organizations as Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago, The Chicago Community Trust, Polk Bros Foundation Inc.

Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure

Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure at a glance

· Charitable trust

Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure

Q: Where is Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure based?

Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure is based in IL.

The shure charitable trust (the trust) has been organized to be operated at all times and exclusively to support and carry out the purposes of the jewish federation of metropolitan chicago and the jewish united fund of metropolitan chicago, both of which are illinois not-for-profit corporations organized and operated exclusively for…

$5.6M

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$2.8M

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$19MHealth$4.1MArts & Culture$2.6MCivil Rights$1.1MEducation$609kCrime & Legal$455kEmployment$455kAnimals$430kOther$0

02FY2025 · 35 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

$10k–50k20 grants · $370k
$50k–250k12 grants · $670k
$250k+3 grants · $4.5M

$25,000

Median grant

States reached

$65M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Jewish United Fund of Metropolitan Chicago	$2,791,739
Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago	$1,470,000
United Way of Metropolitan Chicago	$250,000
Planned Parenthood of Illinois	$90,000
Safer Foundation	$60,000
Spertus Institute for Jewish Learning and Leadership	$60,000
CARA Program	$60,000
Chicago Symphony Orchestra	$50,000
Hebrew Free Loan Society of New York	$50,000
Lyric Opera of Chicago	$50,000
Lincoln Park Zoological Society	$50,000
Children First Fund the chicago public schools foundation	$50,000
Metropolitan Family Services	$50,000
american Society for Technion - Israel Inst for Technology	$50,000
Anti-Defamation League	$50,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $694k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$24M · 30 repeat orgs$293k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$24M

$163k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%

+14%

Still filing today

97%

100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $130k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsEducationHealthInternationalOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

JU
JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
9× · 2017–2025 · $13M · revenue +13%
LO
Lyric Opera of Chicago
9× · 2017–2025 · $661k · revenue +33%
TA
THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO
8× · 2017–2024 · $620k · revenue +45%

Funded once

CP
CHICAGO PSYCHOANALYTIC INSTITUTE
one grant, 2017 · $57k · revenue -28%
AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL SPORT CENTER FOR THE DISABLED
one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
AC
Associated Colleges of Illinois Inc
one grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue +14%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

University of Chicago

The mission of the university of chicago has been to sustain at the highest level of excellence, the communication of knowledge, the creation of knowledge and the fostering of a dynamic community of scholars and students.

Education

Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education

Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—

Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy

Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech

Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education

Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education

Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Forward Association Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Adler Planetarium. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

41/41

Grantees still filing

30/41

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Philanthropy$21,519,897Arts & Culture$1,654,279Other$3,422,056Education$1,008,754International$929,851Civil Rights$869,685Health$847,013

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · The Chicago Community Trust · Polk Bros Foundation Inc · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · Circle of Service Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Shure Charitable Trust Created Uw of Sidney N Shure’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home