· Private foundation
Shirley & William S McIntyre Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k18 grants · $40k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $103k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $566k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UTD CENTER FOR BRAIN HEALTH | $200,250 |
| DALLAS SYMPHONY FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION | $133,491 |
| SAINT MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS FOUNDATION OF DALLAS | $82,200 |
| BRAVO COLORADO AT VAIL-BEAVER CREEK | $32,011 |
| VAN CLIBURN FOUNDATION INC | $17,500 |
| EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE TRANSFIGURATION | $13,000 |
| THE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| DALLAS ARBORETUM & BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC | $10,000 |
| SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CORP | $10,000 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY OF TEXAS | $10,000 |
| MEADOWS MUSEUM | $6,000 |
| THE SENIOR SOURCE | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| BAYLOR SCOTT AND WHITE ALL SAINTS HEALTH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
67 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 47 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $291k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- VCVan Cliburn Foundation Inc6× · 2018–2025 · $227k · revenue +240%
- DADALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $172k · revenue +13%
- TCTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL7× · 2017–2024 · $53k · revenue +11%
Funded once
- VHVAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $38k · revenue +97%
- SSMUone grant, 2018 · $26k
- PFPEPPER FAMILY FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +242%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.
The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
Support of the dallas zoo as an outstanding center of education, entertainment and wildlife conservation through fundraising, volunteerism, promoting public awareness and participation, and enhancing the visitor experience.
Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.
To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salesmanship Club Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Pepper Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
96 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 96 of the 183 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds All Angels Foundation ↗
- Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds DALLAS ARBORETUM AND BOTANICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR BRAIN HEALTH ADVANCES ↗
- Who funds BRAVO COLORADO AT BEAVER CREEK-VAIL INC DBA BRAVO VAIL VALLEY MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
- Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
- Who funds Columbus School for Girls ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds VAIL HEALTH SERVICES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Americans for Prosperity Foundation ↗
- Who funds VAIL RELIGIOUS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PEPPER FAMILY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE VAIL JAZZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CASA ↗
- Who funds Baylor Health Care System Foundation ↗
- Who funds The Dallas Opera ↗
- Who funds OUR FRIENDS PLACE ↗
- Who funds Broadway Dallas Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The Perot Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · Arkay Foundation Inc · The Eugene McDermott Foundation · The Moody Foundation · The Rosewood Foundation · The Addy Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Shirley & William S McIntyre Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.