Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Schapero Family Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20192025.

Health$202kYouth Development$24kArts & Culture$15kPhilanthropy$8kCommunity Improvement$2kRecreation & Sports$1kHuman Services$880Animals$589Education$550Other$26k
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $22k
$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$61k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRENVILLE BAKER BOYS GIRLS CLUB$22,369
TEMPLE BETH EL OF HUNTINGTON$5,180
LONG ISLAND CHILDRENS MUSEUM$4,664
LONG ISLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP$1,750
SUPPORT KRISTEN COYLE FUNERAL AND H$555
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$250
AMERICAN RED CROSS$110
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$105
SUICIDE AND CRISIS LIFELINE$103
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$102
The Breast Cancer Research Foundati$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $300) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TEACH MY KID TO READ: $100 → 14%SUNRISE DAY CAMP: $100 → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $100 → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
NY
IA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$271k · 13 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +9% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
27

Total granted

$271k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+1%

Still filing today

77%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NH
    NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION
    5× · 2019–2023 · $200k · revenue +27%
  • LI
    LONG ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +77%
  • TM
    THE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • TR
    THE REMEMBRANCE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • TB
    THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $550 · revenue +1%
  • CA
    COVERT AVENUE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $535

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
7
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
8
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
11
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
12
Mila's Miracle Foundation

The mission of mila's miracle foundation is to find and fund paths to a cure for batten and other life-threatening neurological disorders. families in this community have been pivotal in raising the necessary funds and awareness. together,…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Breast Cancer Research Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Milana Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Development CentersCommunity Arts OrganizationsYouth Sports Booster Organi…Child and Family ServicesAnimal Rescue and AdoptionYouth Ice Hockey ProgramsWildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Food Pantries & AssistanceDevelopmental Disabilities …Elementary Literacy TutoringChristian Youth CampsCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr14%7%5–10yr20%20%10–20yr19%23%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr20%4%10–20yr19%75%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%6%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,729

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $200,260 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION+5 more — $1,790 · HealthTEMPLE BETH-EL OF HUNTINGTON — $12,287 · OtherTEMPLE BETH…NATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION — $5,100 · OtherNATIONAL EA…CATERINA GRACE FOUNDATION INC — $2,000 · OtherCATERINA GR…RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES — $1,150 · OtherTHE REMEMBRANCE FOUNDATION — $1,025 · Other+29 more — $6,760 · Other+29 moreGRENVILLE BAKER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC — $23,869 · Youth DevelopmentGRENVILLE…LONG ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $15,365 · Arts & CultureTHE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $8,256 · Philanthropy+1 more — $104 · PhilanthropyLONG ISLAND REAL ESTATE GROUP INC — $1,750 · Community ImprovementSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $969 · Recreation & SportsHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Health$202,050Other$28,322Youth Development$23,869Arts & Culture$15,365Philanthropy$8,360Community Improvement$1,750Recreation & Sports$1,469

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $200,260 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGRENVILLE BAKER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC — $23,869 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLONG ISLAND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $15,365 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MILANA FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $8,256 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetNATIONAL EATING DISORDERS ASSOCIATION — $5,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $1,281 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC — $969 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND — $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWENTWORTH SENIOR LIVING — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE — $470 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC — $288 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $201 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $110 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc — $104 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY CENTER FOR ACHIEVEMENT CO LIFE'S WORC — $103 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOLF CONSERVATION CENTER INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH — $90 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLO PARENT — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL DYSLEXIA ASSOCIATION INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Gershwind FoundationNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Gershwind Foundation · The Bahnik Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Schapero Family Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Schapero Family Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Schapero Family Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph