Skip to content

· Private foundation

Sawchuk Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$252k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$474kHousing & Shelter$305kEducation$220kFood & Nutrition$210kHealth$200kYouth Development$165kPublic Benefit$120kEmployment$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $232k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jenesse$25,000
St Barnabas Senior Services$25,000
WESTSIDE FOOD BANK$25,000
PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS$25,000
Achievable Foundation$25,000
Westside Family Health Center$25,000
Individual grant recipient$22,000
Children's Institute$20,000
CASA$10,000
Chrysalis$10,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$10,000
SCHOOL ON WHEELS$10,000
UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$7,500
Saving Innocence$7,500
Access Books$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $366k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Achievable Foundation: $25k → 14%Achievable Foundation: $10k → 14%Achievable Foundation: $10k → 14%Achievable Foundation: $10k → 14%Achievable Foundation: $10k → 14%PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $25k → 14%PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $18k → 14%PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $15k → 14%PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $15k → 14%PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $15k → 14%PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $15k → 14%PATH: $15k → 14%PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $15k → 14%PATH--PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $10k → 14%Children's Institute: $20k → 14%Children's Institute Inc: $10k → 14%Children's Institute: $10k → 14%Children's Institute Inc: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $15k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $15k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $15k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $15k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $11k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $10k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $8k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 16 repeat orgs$113k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
9

Total granted

$1.6M
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+44%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WF
    WESTSIDE FOOD BANK
    9× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +348%
  • SO
    SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $185k · revenue +2%
  • HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES
    8× · 2018–2025 · $150k · revenue +157%

Funded once

  • HI
    HOMEBOY INDUSTRIESJOBS FOR A FUTURE
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • VENICE FAMILY CLINICgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +110%
  • CH
    COVENANT HOUSE
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Hollywood Community Housing Corp

The organization develops and operates high quality affordable housing and provides resident services for low-income families, seniors and people with special needs.

Housing & Shelter
2
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
3
Lafh Permanent Housing Corp

Lafh permanent housing corp. i (casa central) has been established to own a 6-unit complex located in los angeles, california, which provides permanent housing for families with low income.

Housing & Shelter
4
Hollywood Food Coalition

Hollywood food coalition welcomes people to dinner each night. we rescue and redistribute food daily to other organizations. we care for our immediate community through our wellness program. we build community with and through our…

—
5
Human Services Association

The principal mission of Human Services Association is to provide families with compassionate and comprehensive care to promote wellness and build strong communities.

Human Services
6
Habitat for Humanity of La Plata County Inc

To build decent, affordable homes in partnership with families in need.

—
7
Latino Family Institute Inc

Latino family institute is an adoption, foster care and family support agency dedicated to improving social welfare conditions leading to increased family functioning.

Human Services
8
Inner City Law Center

In 2024, Inner City Law Center, ICLC, served over 3,400 people, helping vulnerable Angelenos to remain in their homes and recover nearly $20.5 million in financial benefits.

Crime & Legal
9
Health Access for All Inc Dba Angeles Community Health Center

Dedicated to providing comprehensive primary medical care, dental services and care coordination for the care and well-being of all los angeles residents. the organization provides high quality, comprehensive primary and preventative…

Health
10
Los Angeles Christian Health Centers

The mission of los angeles christian health centers is to follow christ by loving and serving our neighbors through the provision of comprehensive quality healthcare. our vision is the healing and restoration of homeless and underserved…

Health
11
Westcare California Inc

To provide substance abuse prevention & treatment.

Health
12
Via Care Community Health Center

Providing health care services to the poor and underserved of los angeles.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Institute Inc; the most unlike its peers is Access Books. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $132,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCHRYSALIS: $120,000 · OtherCHRYSALISST BARNABAS SENIOR CENTER OF LOS ANGELES: $115,000 · OtherST BARNABAS SENIOR CENTER OF LOS ANGEL…CASA: $92,500 · OtherCASAJenesse: $40,000 · OtherJenesseHOMEBOY INDUSTRIESJOBS FOR A FUTURE: $25,000 · Other+7 more: $72,500 · Other+7 morePATH: $143,000 · Human ServicesPATHUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $108,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILD…THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $65,000 · Human ServicesTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATIONSAVING INNOCENCE INC: $60,500 · Human ServicesSAVING INNOCENCE INCCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INCSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $185,000 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEE…ACCESS BOOKS: $35,000 · EducationACCESS BOOKSWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $205,000 · Food & NutritionWESTSIDE FOOD…HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $150,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY I…WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $105,000 · HealthWESTSIDE …VIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $20,000 · HealthVIP COMMU…VENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $15,000 · HealthVENICE FA…
Other$597,000Human Services$426,500Education$220,000Food & Nutrition$205,000Youth Development$150,000Health$140,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWESTSIDE FOOD BANK: $205,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $185,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $150,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPATH: $143,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetST BARNABAS SENIOR CENTER OF LOS ANGELES: $115,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $108,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetWESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER: $105,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAVING INNOCENCE INC: $60,500 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetACCESS BOOKS: $35,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetVIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAMP INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetExtraordinary Families: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WESTSIDE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds ST BARNABAS SENIOR CENTER OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE ACHIEVABLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAVING INNOCENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ACCESS BOOKS ↗
  • Who funds VIP COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds LAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Extraordinary Families ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Weingart Foundation · QueensCare · Unihealth Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Sawchuk Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Sawchuk Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Sawchuk Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Sawchuk Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Sawchuk Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph