Skip to content
Saucony Run for Good Incorporated at a glance

· Private foundation

Saucony Run for Good Incorporated

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2023
9
Grants FY2023
7
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2023.

Youth Development$122kRecreation & Sports$70kHuman Services$47kEducation$26kHealth$18kPublic Benefit$10kArts & Culture$10kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$6,100
Median grant
7
States reached
$11k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Transformation Life Center BMR$10,000
EMBE Girls on the Run SD$10,000
Special Olympics Montana$7,750
Redlands Christian Migrant Associat$6,750
Individual grant recipient$6,100
Notah Begay III NB3 Foundation$5,500
Abbotsford SchoolsFFF Program$5,000
Floranada Falcon Run Club$3,000
Itasca County Family YMCA$583
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 59% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Itasca County Family YMCA: $583 → 11%To Be Empowered: $5k → 10%Redlands Christian Migrant Associat: $7k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
OH
NJ
CA
MO
WV
VA
DE
NM
KS
AR
TN
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$70k · 3 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
31

Total granted

$70k
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+6%

Still filing today

67%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RD
    Rod Dixons Kids Marathon Foundation
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k
  • YE
    YOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INC
    2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +9%
  • TB
    TRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC
    2× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue -14%

Funded once

  • RA
    RURAL AMERICA INITIATIVES
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +6%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +3%
  • GO
    Girls on the Run of the Flint Hillsgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Oklahoma City

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
2
Ymca of Northern Rock County Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

—
3
The Young Mens Christian Association of the Chippewa Valley

Our mission is to build strong kids, strong families, and strong communities. The YMCA of the Chippewa Valley is a community centered association dedicated to building a healthy spirit, mind and body for all people, while maintaining an…

Human Services
4
Henry County Ymca Inc

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

—
5
Greater Missoula Family Ymca

The missoula family ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the y serves families and individuals of all ages, abilities, incomes, races and religions.…

Human Services
6
Shasta County Young Men's Christian Association

The shasta family ymca strengthens community through programs and activities that create a healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
7
Family Ymca Association

Providing recreational activities without regard to race, religion, or socio-economic status

Human Services
8
Young Men's Christian Association of Brainerd

The mission of the brainerd family ymca is to enhance the lives in the brainerd lakes area by connecting individuals and families with opportunities based on christian values that build a healthy spirit, mind, & body.

Human Services
9
Lake County Young Men's Christian Association

The mission of the lake county ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all.

Human Services
10
Young Men's Christian Association of the Virginia Peninsulas

Our mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. our focus is on youth development, healthy living and social responsibility. we help kids succeed, prepare teens…

Human Services
11
Valdosta-Lowndes County Family Ymca (1456)

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all

Human Services
12
The Young Men's Christian Association of Birmingham Inc

The young men's christian association of birmingham, inc. is a charitable organization that opens its doors to all women, men, families, teenagers, and children regardless of their ability to pay. the mission of the ymca is to put…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grand River Area Family Ymca Inc; the most unlike its peers is BlazeSports America Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rod Dixons Kids Marathon Foundation: $30,000 · OtherRod Dixons Kids Marathon FoundationYOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INC: $20,000 · OtherYOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INCTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES: $10,000 · OtherBolivar County Comm Action Agency: $10,000 · OtherTransformation Life Center BMR: $10,000 · OtherCincinnati City School District: $10,000 · OtherEMBE: $10,000 · OtherBoys and Girls Club North Alabama: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherRucker Academy: $10,000 · OtherNEMOURS DU PONT HOSPITAL FOR CHILDR: $8,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · Other+12 more: $47,546 · Other+12 moreTRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentTRINITY BOSTON CONNE…Girls on the Run of the Flint Hills: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirls on the Run of …LIFE SKILLS FOR YOUTH: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIFE SKILLS FOR YOUT…EMERALD YOUTH FOUNDATION: $9,300 · Youth DevelopmentEMERALD YOUTH FOUNDA…YOUTH RUN NOLA INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH RUN NOLA INCPAGE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $4,200 · Youth DevelopmentPAGE ALLIANCE FOR CO…THE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA: $3,157 · Youth DevelopmentHAPPINESS IS CAMPING: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsHAPPINESS IS…FINDING OUR STRIDE: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsFINDING OUR …SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $7,750 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYM…THE NOTAH BEGAY III FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 · Recreation & SportsTHE NOTAH BE…BlazeSports America Inc: $3,725 · Recreation & SportsBlazeSports …ITALIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,000 · HealthACTIVE SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA INC: $10,000 · HealthREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC: $6,750 · Human ServicesTO BE EMPOWERED: $5,000 · Human ServicesITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC: $583 · Human ServicesRURAL AMERICA INITIATIVES: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY ROCKS CORP: $10,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$192,646Youth Development$61,657Recreation & Sports$36,975Health$20,000Human Services$12,333Community Improvement$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYOUTH ENRICHMENT SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTRINITY BOSTON CONNECTS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRURAL AMERICA INITIATIVES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER DES MOINES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGirls on the Run of the Flint Hills: $10,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetHAPPINESS IS CAMPING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY ROCKS CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetEMBE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetITALIAN HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE SKILLS FOR YOUTH: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetFINDING OUR STRIDE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetACTIVE SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetEMERALD YOUTH FOUNDATION: $9,300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $7,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetREDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC: $6,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NOTAH BEGAY III FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH RUN NOLA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGRAND RIVER AREA FAMILY YMCA INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAGE ALLIANCE FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $4,200 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetBlazeSports America Inc: $3,725 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE OLYMPIC PENINSULA: $3,157 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetITASCA COUNTY FAMILY YMCA INC: $583 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dick's Sporting Goods…First Interstate Banc…Share Our StrengthCharities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…The Pfizer Foundation…The Blackbaud Giving …Morgan Stanley Global…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…National Philanthropi…Natl Christian Charit…
Dick's Sporting Goods FoundationPA15.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Share Our Strength · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Saucony Run for Good Incorporated funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Saucony Run for Good Incorporated. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 51%
  • Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc: 51% of income from government
  • Italian Home for Children Inc: 29% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Saucony Run for Good Incorporated?

Find your warmest path to Saucony Run for Good Incorporated through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Saucony Run for Good’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home