How much did SAUCONY RUN FOR GOOD INCORPORATED grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 61% of SAUCONY RUN FOR GOOD INCORPORATED’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2023 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

Under $10k7 grants · $35k
$10k–50k2 grants · $20k

$6,100

Median grant

States reached

$12k

Total assets

Largest grants

Transformation Life Center BMR$10,000
EMBE Girls on the Run SD$10,000
Special Olympics Montana$7,750
Redlands Christian Migrant Associat$6,750
Coleman Elementary$6,100
Notah Begay III NB3 Foundation$5,500
Abbotsford SchoolsFFF Program$5,000
Floranada Falcon Run Club$3,000
Itasca County Family YMCA$583

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–23, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 11%. 10% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

20%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$70k · 3 repeat orgs$274k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +92% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$70k

$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%

+33%

Still filing today

67%

39%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RD
Rod Dixons Kids Marathon Foundation
3× · 2020–2022 · $30k
YE
Youth Enrichment Services
2× · 2021–2022 · $20k · revenue +92%
TB
Trinity Boston Connects
2× · 2020–2022 · $20k · revenue -48%

Funded once

RA
Rural America Initiatives
one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +12%
BA
Boys and Girls Club North Alabama
one grant, 2021 · $10k
CP
Cincinnati Public Schools
one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Forging Youth Resilience

To operate a fitness training program for at-risk or underserved youths.

Crime & Legal

Youth Incorporated

Our mission is to advance the mental, moral, and physical development of boys and girls, as well as families and others, through a variety of camping, sports, and recreational activities with the goal of "building leaders for tomorrow".

Youth Development

Family Ymca

Providing recreational activities without regard to race, religion, or socio-economic status

Human Services

Meadville Area Family Ymca

Youth development: our y is committed to nurturing the potential of every child and teen. we believe that all kids deserve the opportunity to discover who they are and what they can achieve. that's why we help young people cultivate the…

Human Services

Abilitypath

Empower people with special needs to achieve their full potential through innovative inclusive programs and community partnerships.

Employment

Illinois Ymca Youth

To provide the youth of illinois with an immersive educational experience to inspire and promote life-long leadership, ethics, responsible citizenship and self-confidence through participation in a unique model state government program.

Youth Development

Youthlink

To support and empower young people on their journey to self-reliance.

Human Services

Owen County Family Ymca Inc

Putting christian principles into action and practice through programs that promote well being through physical fitness, and enhancement of personal growth for all members of the community through various programs offered.

Human Services

Ymca of Southern Arizona

The ymca of southern arizona is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and to helping all people realize their fullest potential through the development of spirit, mind and body.

Human Services

Winona Family Ymca Inc

Provide opportunities for all in our community to develop their well being.

—

Fitness Alternative Inspiring Teen Health Inc

Inspiring and promoting wellness, literacy, and healthy lifestyles for teens, while fostering self-esteem and self-sufficiency

—

Girls On the Run Utah

Educate and prepare girls for a lifetime of self-respect and healthy living through the power of running.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Itasca County Family Ymca Inc and the most unlike its peers is To Be Empowered. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/17

Grantees still filing

12/17

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$208,053Youth Development$58,500Recreation & Sports$31,475Health$20,000Community Improvement$10,000Arts & Culture$10,000Human Services$5,583

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dick's Sporting Goods FoundationPA12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation SAUCONY RUN FOR GOOD INCORPORATED funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE FLINT HILLS.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

medium risk

~4 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 463669188 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on GIRLS ON THE RUN OF THE FLINT HILLS, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

WatchFinancial stability— Roughly 4 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 8% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Saucony Run for Good Incorporated?

Find your warmest path to Saucony Run for Good Incorporated through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

SAUCONY RUN FOR GOOD INCORPORATED

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Saucony Run for Good Incorporated?

More from the funding graph

SAUCONY RUN FOR GOOD INCORPORATED

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

17 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Saucony Run for Good Incorporated?

More from the funding graph