· Private foundation
Sapphire Foundation Inc
Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k42 grants · $152k
- $10k–50k32 grants · $510k
- $50k–250k6 grants · $302k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST | $52,000 |
| VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS | $50,000 |
| PEGASUS FOUNDATION DBA DALLAS INSTITUTE OF HUMAN | $50,000 |
| TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND | $50,000 |
| DALLAS THEATER CENTER | $50,000 |
| DALLAS CHILDRENS ADVOCACY CENTER | $50,000 |
| DALLAS FOUNDATION A TX NONPROFIT CORPORATION | $35,000 |
| TACA INC | $30,000 |
| SAINT MICHAEL AND ALL ANGELS CHURCH | $25,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS | $25,000 |
| DALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS | $25,000 |
| NETWORK GROUP INC | $25,000 |
| NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER | $25,000 |
| IMPACT CITY INITIATIVE | $25,000 |
| IMPACT CITY INITIATIVE | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $746k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +16% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 43 still active in FY2023, 18 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MPMY POSSIBILITIES3× · 2020–2023 · $182k · revenue +23%
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND3× · 2020–2023 · $175k · revenue +113%- PSPHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST4× · 2020–2023 · $157k · revenue +69%
Funded once
- PSPhilip Salem Foundationone grant, 2022 · $25k
- TTTEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +14%
- MSMERCY STREETone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.
Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…
Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…
To support the mission of Dallas Theological Seminary by offering charitable planned giving and other related services to friends of the Seminary.
Dallas Christian is a college preparatory school committed to Biblical values where students are prepared for Christ-centered lives of purpose, service and leadership.
The foundation's mission is to strengthen and support faith communities by partnering wise investments with purposeful giving.
To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.
Dallas contemporary presents art in a forum that cultivates artists, ignites learning and inspires the community. dallas contemporary is a non-collecting art museum presenting new and challenging ideas from regional, national and…
Using Shakespeare's works as a cornerstone, Shakespeare Dallas serves the Southwest region with fun and accessible indoor and outdoor theatre, integrated school programs, and cultural enrichment for people of all ages and backgrounds.
The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.
The dcms foundation's mission is to improve the quality and distribution of health services throughout dallas county.
The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Dallas Children's Advocacy Center and the most unlike its peers is Polly Boyd Scholarship Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 124 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Impact City Initiative ↗
- Who funds VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds MY POSSIBILITIES ↗
- Who funds DALLAS THEATER CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds PHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds JUNE SHELTON SCHOOL AND EVALUATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds DALLAS SOCIAL VENTURE PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Southern Methodist University ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE WEZMORE PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds JUST COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Network Group Inc ↗
- Who funds DALLAS FIREFIGHTERS MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY PARK SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds THE NASHER SCULPTURE CENTER ↗
- Who funds JUBILEE PARK & COMMUNITY CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CITY TEACHING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds TACA INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND THOUGHT THEATRE ↗
- Who funds PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds DALLAS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WILKINSON CENTER ↗
- Who funds ASCEND DALLAS ↗
- Who funds Dallas Museum of Art ↗
- Who funds PEROT MUSEUM OF NATURE & SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds JOHN S BRADFIELD SCHOOL PARENT-TEACHER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Philip Salem Foundation ↗
- Who funds TEXAS TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MERCY STREET ↗
- Who funds Salesmanship Club Charitable Golf of Dallas Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW KEY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LEGACY PARENTING CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · The Dallas Foundation · Hoblitzelle Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Meadows Foundation Inc · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Addy Foundation · The Aileen and Jack Pratt Foundation · Theodore and Beulah Beasley Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sapphire Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Food for the Poor Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sapphire Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Sapphire Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.