· Private foundation
Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $132k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHARING EXCESS | $15,000 |
| CITY YEAR INC | $10,000 |
| METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD | $10,000 |
| WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE | $7,500 |
| TALLER PUERTORRIQUENO INC | $7,000 |
| EASTERN UNIVERSITY | $7,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA YOUTH ORCHESTRA | $7,000 |
| SENIORLAW CENTER | $7,000 |
| DOMESTIC ABUSE PROJECT OF DELAWARE COUNT | $7,000 |
| JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDRENS SERVICE | $7,000 |
| GOOD KARMA GARAGE | $6,000 |
| JOHN BARTRAM ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA VIP INC | $5,000 |
| VETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN | $5,000 |
| PALS PROGRAMS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $306k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
57 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $55k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OWOperation Warm Inc6× · 2018–2024 · $51k · revenue +216%
- SESHARING EXCESS3× · 2023–2025 · $37k · revenue +694%
- MAMETROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE6× · 2018–2025 · $33k · revenue +15%
Funded once
College Unboundone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue +21%- RHRahabs Hopeone grant, 2023 · $7k · revenue +25%
- TCThe Center for Autismone grant, 2019 · $7k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
Friends of the children philadelphia has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…
Philadelphia youth network (pyn) equips young people to build lifelong skills, pursue meaningful careers, and embrace change with confidence - so they can thrive in the workforce, experience economic mobility, and strengthen their…
PHILABUNDANCE WAS FOUNDED IN 1984 WITH THE SIMPLE BELIEF THAT NO ONE SHOULD GO HUNGRY WHILE HEALTHY FOOD GOES TO WASTE. OUR MISSION IS TO DRIVE HUNGER FROM OUR COMMUNITIES TODAY AND TO END HUNGER FOR GOOD. We have a commitment to always…
The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…
The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…
All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
The mission of the urban league is to empower disadvantaged, underresourced and marginalized communities to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.
Pca promotes healing and justice for sexually abused children in philadelphia. using a multidisciplinary approach, we collaborate with our partners in child protection, law enforcement, and medical and mental health services to provide…
The organization was formed to serve all functioning levels of individuals with intellectual developmental disabilities who reside primarily in the philadelphia metropolitan area. services provided include residential, outpatient and adult…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals of Southeastern Pa and the most unlike its peers is Aspire to Autonomy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
115 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 115 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
- Who funds SHARING EXCESS ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN AREA NEIGHBORHOOD NUTRITION ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC ↗
- Who funds CITY YEAR INC ↗
- Who funds THE CAREER WARDROBE ↗
- Who funds Gemma Services ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
- Who funds THE GARAGE COMMUNITY & YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds National Liberty Museum ↗
- Who funds Adoption Center ↗
- Who funds MAIN LINE MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds College Unbound ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS OF SOUTHEASTERN PA ↗
- Who funds Maternity Care Coalition ↗
- Who funds CHESTNUT HILL MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
- Who funds SERVANTS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA ↗
- Who funds SETTLEMENT MUSIC SCHOOL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds VisionLink ↗
- Who funds SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ENCORE SERIES INC ↗
- Who funds HELPHOPELIVE INC ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEABILITY ↗
- Who funds TALLER PUERTORRIQUENO INC ↗
- Who funds MOMS OFFERING MOMS SUPPORT ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF SOUTHERN CHESTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA VIP INC ↗
- Who funds WHYY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARN AT SPRING BROOK FARM INC ↗
- Who funds HEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE TO AUTONOMY INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL PHILADELPHIA ASSOCIATON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Connelly Foundation · The Gordon Charter Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Independence Foundation · Skilling Joseph Kennard Td · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sanders Caroline J S Td No 2 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.